Mouse tracking: Measuring and predicting users' experience of web-based content

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 2963-2972

  Navalpakkam, Vidhya ^a   Churchill, Elizabeth F ^a  

^a YAHOO RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Content effectiveness; Distraction; Frustration; Measurement; Mouse tracking; Prediction; Reading online; User experience; Web pages

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; CONTENT EFFECTIVENESS; DISTRACTION; FRUSTRATION; READING ONLINE; USER EXPERIENCE;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; FORECASTING; HUMAN ENGINEERING; MEASUREMENTS; WEBSITES;

MAMMALS;

EID: 84862091800     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2207676.2208705     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. E. Arroyo, T. Selker, and W. Wei. Usability tool for analysis of web designs using mouse tracks. In CHI'06 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pages 484-489. ACM, 2006.
2. R. Atterer and P. Lorenzi. A heatmap-based visualization for navigation within large web pages. In Proceedings of the 5th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: building bridges, pages 407-410. ACM, 2008.
3. N. Bruce and J. Tsotsos. Saliency based on information maximization. Advances in neural information processing systems, 18:155, 2006.
4. G. Buscher, R. Biedert, D. Heinesch, and A. Dengel. Eye tracking analysis of preferred reading regions on the screen. In Proceedings of the 28th of the international conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, CHI EA '10, pages 3307-3312, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
5. G. Buscher, E. Cutrell, and M. Morris. What do you see when you're surfing?: using eye tracking to predict salient regions of web pages. In Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 21-30. ACM, 2009.
6. M. Chen, J. Anderson, and M. Sohn. What can a mouse cursor tell us more?: correlation of eye/mouse movements on web browsing. In CHI'01 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pages 281-282. ACM, 2001.
7. A. Cox and M. Silva. The role of mouse movements in interactive search. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, pages 1156-1161, 2006.
8. N. Duran, R. Dale, and D. McNamara. The action dynamics of overcoming the truth. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 17(4):486-491, 2010.
9. J. Freeman and N. Ambady. Motions of the hand expose the partial and parallel activation of stereotypes. Psychological Science, 20(10):1183-1188, 2009.
10. J. Freeman, R. Dale, and T. Farmer. Hand in motion reveals mind in motion. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 2011.
11. J. Freeman, K. Pauker, E. Apfelbaum, and N. Ambady. Continuous dynamics in the real-time perception of race. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(1):179-185, 2010.
12. J. Goldberg, M. Stimson, M. Lewenstein, N. Scott, and A. Wichansky. Eye tracking in web search tasks: design implications. In Proceedings of the 2002 symposium on Eye tracking research & applications, pages 51-58. ACM, 2002.
13. Q. Guo and E. Agichtein. Towards predicting web searcher gaze position from mouse movements. In Proceedings of the 28th of the international conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pages 3601-3606. ACM, 2010.
14. J. Harel, C. Koch, and P. Perona. Graph-based visual saliency. Advances in neural information processing systems, 19:545, 2007.
15. K. Hornbæk and E. Frøkjær. Reading patterns and usability in visualizations of electronic documents. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 10(2):119-149, 2003.
16. J. Huang, R. White, and S. Dumais. No clicks, no problem: using cursor movements to understand and improve search. In Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 1225-1234. ACM, 2011.
17. L. Itti and C. Koch. A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision research, 40(10-12):1489-1506, 2000.
18. L. Itti and C. Koch. Computational modelling of visual attention. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2(3):194-203, Mar 2001.
19. D. Lagun and E. Agichtein. Viewser: enabling large-scale remote user studies of web search examination and interaction. In Proceedings of the 34th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in Information, pages 365-374. ACM, 2011.
20. J. Magnuson. Moving hand reveals dynamics of thought. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(29):9995, 2005.
21. C. McKinstry, R. Dale, and M. Spivey. Action dynamics reveal parallel competition in decision making. Psychological Science, 19(1):22, 2008.
22. F. Mueller and A. Lockerd. Cheese: tracking mouse movement activity on websites, a tool for user modeling. In CHI'01 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pages 279-280. ACM, 2001.
23. V. Navalpakkam, J. Rao, and M. Slaney. Using gaze patterns to study and predict reading struggles due to distraction. In Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pages 1705-1710. ACM, 2011.
24. J. Nielsen and K. Pernice. Eyetracking web usability. New Riders Pub, 2009.
25. B. Pan, H. Hembrooke, G. Gay, L. Granka, M. Feusner, and J. Newman. The determinants of web page viewing behavior: an eye-tracking study. In Proceedings of the 2004 symposium on Eye tracking research & applications, pages 147-154. ACM, 2004.
26. K. Rodden, X. Fu, A. Aula, and I. Spiro. Eye-mouse coordination patterns on web search results pages. In CHI'08 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pages 2997-3002. ACM, 2008.
27. J. Song and K. Nakayama. Hidden cognitive states revealed in choice reaching tasks. Trends in cognitive sciences, 13(8):360-366, 2009.
28. M. Spivey, M. Grosjean, and G. Knoblich. Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(29):10393, 2005.
29. A. Treisman and G. Gelade. A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12:97-136, 1980.
30. J. Wolfe and T. Horowitz. What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(6):495-501, 2004.