Novel flexible dry PU/TiN-multipin electrodes: First application in EEG measurements

Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 55-58

  Fiedler, P ^a   Pedrosa, P ^b   Griebel, S ^a   Fonseca, C ^c   Vaz, F ^b   Zanow, F ^d,e   Haueisen, J ^a,f  

^a ILMENAU UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

^c INEB INSTITUTO DE ENGENHARIA BIOMÉDICA   (Portugal)

^d ANT BV   (Netherlands)

^e Eemagine GmbH   (Germany)

^f KING SAUD UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AG/AGCL; BIOSIGNALS; DC MAGNETRON SPUTTERING TECHNIQUE; ELECTRICALLY CONDUCTIVE; ELECTRODE DESIGN; RANK SUM TESTS; SIGNAL QUALITY; SKIN CONTACT; THIN LAYERS; VISUAL EVOKED POTENTIAL;

BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; TITANIUM; TITANIUM NITRIDE;

ELECTRODES;

BIOMATERIAL; TITANIUM; TITANIUM NITRIDE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN; CHEMISTRY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVOKED RESPONSE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; MICROELECTRODE; PHYSIOLOGY; PILOT STUDY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG MODULUS; EQUIPMENT FAILURE;

ADULT; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BRAIN; ELASTIC MODULUS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; EVOKED POTENTIALS; HUMANS; MALE; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; MICROELECTRODES; PILOT PROJECTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TITANIUM;

EID: 84861958382     PISSN: 1557170X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6089895     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. A. Searle, and L. Kirkup, "A direct comparison of wet, dry and insulating bioelectric recording electrodes", Physiological Measurement, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 271-283, May, 2000.
2. P. Tallgren, S. Vanhatalo, K. Kaila et al., "Evaluation of commercially available electrodes and gels for recording of slow EEG potentials", Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 116, no. 4, pp. 799-806, Apr, 2005.
3. R. Merletti, "The electrode-skin interface and optimal detection of bioelectric signals", Physiological Measurement, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 154-156, Oct, 2010.
4. M. S. Fernandes, N. S. Dias, A. F. Silva et al., "Hydrogel-based photonic sensor for a biopotential wearable recording system", Biosensors & Bioelectronics, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 80-86, Sep, 2010.
5. P. Fiedler, L.T. Cunha, P. Pedrosa et al., "Novel TiNx-based biosignal electrodes for electroencephalography", Measurement Science and Technology. accepted.
6. S. Piscanec, L. C. Ciacchi, E. Vesselli et al., "Bioactivity of TiNcoated titanium implants", Acta Materialia, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 1237-1245, Mar, 2004.
7. L. T. Cunha, P. Pedrosa, C. J. Tavares et al., "The role of composition, morphology and crystalline structure in the electrochemical behaviour of TiNx thin films for dry electrode sensor materials", Electrochimica Acta, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 59-67, Dec, 2009.
8. J. V. Odom, M. Bach, M. Brigell et al., "ISCEV standard for clinical visual evoked potentials (2009 update)", Documenta Ophthalmologica, vol. 120, no. 1, pp. 111-119, Feb, 2010.
9. D. Lehmann, and W. Skrandies, "Spatial analysis of evoked potentials in man-a review", Progress in Neurobiology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 227-251, 1984.