Reinforcement sensitivity and conflict processing

Journal of Individual Differences

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 160-168

  Leue, Anja ^a   Lange, Sebastian ^a   Beauducel, André ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

behavioral inhibition system; conflict; Infomax rotation; N2 component; Promax rotation; reinforcement; spatiotemporal principal component analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861954223     PISSN: 16140001     EISSN: 21512299     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000096     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Albert, J., Lopéz-Martín, S., & Carretíe, L. (2010). Emotional context modulates response inhibition: Neural and behavioral data. Neuroimage, 49, 914-921.
2. Amodio, D. M., Master, S. L., Yee, C. M., & Taylor, S. E. (2008). Neurocognitive components of the behavioral inhibition and activation systems: Implications for theories of self-regulation. Psychophysiology, 45, 11-19. (Pubitemid 350233278)
3. Arbel, Y., & Donchin, E. (2009). Parsing the componential structure of posterror ERPs: A principal component analysis of ERPs following errors. Psychophysiology, 46, 1179-1189.
4. Beattie, E. K., & Corr, P. J. (2010). Reinforcement, arousal and temporal factors in procedural learning. Journal of Individual Differences, 31, 167-177.
5. Beauducel, A., Debener, S., Brocke, B., & Kayser, J. (2000). On the reliability of augment-ting/reducing: Peak amplitudes and principal component analysis of auditory evoked potentials. Journal of Psychophysiology, 14, 226-240. (Pubitemid 32237045)
6. Botvinick, M. M. (2007). Conflict monitoring and decision making: Reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 356-366.
7. Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319-333.
8. Corr, P. J. (2008). The reinforcement sensitivity theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9. Corr, P. J. (2010). Automatic and controlled processes in behavioral control: Implications for personality theory. European Journal of Personality, 24, 376-403.
10. Crespi, L. P. (1944). Amount of reinforcement and level of performance. Psychological Review, 51, 341-357.
11. Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis (http://sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/). Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134, 9-21. (Pubitemid 38224183)
12. Dien, J. (2010). Evaluating two-step PCA of ERP data with Geomin, Infomax, Oblimin, Promax, and Varimax rotations. Psychophysiology, 47, 170-183.
13. Dien, J., Beal, D. J., & Berg, P. (2005). Optimizing principal components analysis of event-related potentials: Matrix type, factor loading weighting, extraction, and rotation. Clinical Neurophysiology, 116, 1808-1825. (Pubitemid 41040049)
14. Dien, J., Khoe, W., & Mangun, G. R. (2007). Evaluation of PCA and ICA of simulated ERPs: Promax vs. Infomax rotations. Human Brain Mapping, 28, 742-763. (Pubitemid 47255125)
15. Folstein, J. R., & Van Patten, C. (2008). Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: A review. Psychophysiology, 45, 152-170. (Pubitemid 350233271)
16. Heym, N., Ferguson, E., & Lawrence, C. (2008). An evaluation of the relationship between Gray's revised RST and Eysenck's PEN: Distinguishing BIS and FFFS in Carver and White's BIS/BAS scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 709-715.
17. Jasper, H. H. (1958). The 10-20 electrode system of the International Federation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 10, 371-375.
18. Kayser, J., & Tenke, C. E. (2003). Optimizing PCA methodology for ERP component identification and measurement: Theoretical rationale and empirical evaluation. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114, 2307-2325. (Pubitemid 37498221)
19. Kropotov, J. D., Ponomarev, V. A., Hollup, S., & Mueller, A. (2011). Dissociating action inhibition, conflict monitoring and sensory mismatch into independent components of event related potentials in GO/NOGO task. Neuroimage, 57, 565-575.
20. Lavric, A., Pizzagalli, D. A., & Forstmeier, S. (2004). When "go" and "nogo" are equally frequent: ERP components and cortical tomography. European Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 2483-2488. (Pubitemid 39472411)
21. Leue, A., & Beauducel, A. (2008). A meta-analysis of reinforcement sensitivity theory: On performance parameters in reinforcement tasks. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 353-369.
22. Leue, A., Chavanon, M.-L., Wacker, J., & Stemmler, G. (2009). On the differentiation of N2 components in an appetitive choice task: Evidence for the revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory. Psychophysiology, 46, 1244-1257.
23. Leue, A., Lange, S., & Beauducel, A. (in press). Modulation of the conflict monitoring intensity: The role of aversive reinforcement, cognitive demand, and trait-BIS. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience.
24. McNaughton, N., & Corr, P. J. (2008). The neuropsychology of fear and anxiety: A foundation for reinforcement sensitivity theory. In P. J.Corr (Ed.), The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality (pp. 44-94). Cambridge, UK: University Press.
25. Nieuwenhuis, S., Yeung, N., van den Wildenberg, W., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2003). Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/nogo task: Effects of response conflict and trial type frequency. Cognitive, Affective, Behavioral Neuroscience, 3, 17-26. (Pubitemid 37517032)
26. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
27. Schacht, A., Dimigen, O., & Sommer, W. (2010). Emotions in cognitive conflicts are not aversive but are task specific. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 10, 349-356.
28. Sehlmeyer, C., Konrad, C., Zwitserlood, P., Arolt, V., Falkenstein, M., & Beste, C. (2010). ERP indices for response inhibition are related to anxiety-related personality traits. Neuropsychologia, 48, 2488-2495.
29. Smith, J. L., Smith, E. A., Provost, A. L., & Heathcote, A. (2010). Sequence effects support the conflict theory of N2 and P3 in the go/nogo task. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 75, 217-226.
30. Strobel, A., Beauducel, A., Debener, S., & Brocke, B. (2001). Psychometrische und strukturelle Merkmale einer deutschsprachigen Version des BIS/BAS Fragebogens von Carver und White [Psychometric and structural features of a German version of the BIS/BAS scales of Carver and White]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 22, 216-227. (Pubitemid 33352366)
31. Turner, N. E. (1998). The effect of common variance and structure pattern on random data eigenvalues: Implications for the