What influences a patients decision to use custom-made orthopaedic shoes?

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Volumn 13, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Van Netten, Jaap J ^a,b   Dijkstra, Pieter U ^a,c   Geertzen, Jan H B ^a   Postema, Klaas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b Hospital Group Twente   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; ORTHOPEDIC SHOE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; WALKING; DECISION MAKING; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FOOT DISEASE; MALE; ORTHOSIS; PATIENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SHOE; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

AGED; DECISION MAKING; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FOOT DISEASES; HUMANS; MALE; ORTHOTIC DEVICES; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENTS; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; SHOES; WALKING;

EID: 84861942095     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-92     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Postema K, Toornend JLA, Zilvold G, Schaars AH, Custom made orthopaedic shoes in the medical practice [in Dutch] Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum: Houten/Antwerpen 1991
2. Audit Commission, Fully equipped: the provision to older people or disabled people by the NHS and social services in England and Wales London: The Audit Commission 2000
3. GIP, College voor Zorgverzekeringen, Monitor medical devices [In Dutch] Diemen 2006 http://www.cvz.nl/binaries/live/cvzinternet/hst-content/nl/ documenten/rapporten/2006/rpt0606+monitor+hulpmiddelen.pdf
4. Use of orthopedic shoes in patients with degenerative disorders of the foot. Jannink MJ, IJzerman MJ, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K, Stewart RE, Groothoff JW, Lankhorst GJ, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005 86 687 692 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.06.069 15827918 (Pubitemid 40487833)
5. Use and usability of custom-made orthopedic shoes. Van Netten JJ, Jannink MJA, Hijmans JM, Geertzen JHB, Postema K, J Rehabil Res Dev 2010 47 73 82 10.1682/JRRD.2009.08.0142 20437329
6. Shoes in the cupboard: the fate of prescribed footwear? Williams A, Meacher K, Prosthet Orthot Int 2001 25 53 59 10.1080/03093640108726569 11411006 (Pubitemid 32454543)
7. Audit of special shoes: are they being worn? Baker N, Letherdale B, Diabet Foot 1999 2 100 104
8. Do people with diabetes wear their prescribed footwear? Knowles EA, Boulton AJ, Diabet Med 1996 13 1064 1068 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199612)13: 12<1064::AID-DIA253>3.0.CO;2-# 8973889
9. Patient and professional perspectives on prescribed therapeutic footwear for people with diabetes: a vignette study. Johnson M, Newton P, Goyder E, Patient Educ Couns 2006 64 167 172 10.1016/j.pec.2005.12.013 16469472 (Pubitemid 44772956)
10. Rheumatoid arthritis patients' experiences of wearing therapeutic footwear-a qualitative investigation. Williams AE, Nester CJ, Ravey MI, BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2007 8 104 10.1186/1471-2474-8-104 17976235
11. Factors in diabetic footwear compliance. Macfarlane DJ, Jensen JL, J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2003 93 485 491 14623991 (Pubitemid 38469545)
12. Patients' expectations and actual use of custom-made orthopaedic shoes. Van Netten JJ, Jannink MJA, Hijmans JM, Geertzen JHB, Postema K, Clin Rehabil 2010 24 917 924
13. A new conceptual model for assistive technology outcomes research and practice. Lenker JA, Paquet VL, Assist Technol 2004 16 1 10 10.1080/10400435. 2004.10132069 15357144 (Pubitemid 38955455)
14. The shaping of individual meanings assigned to assistive technology: a review of personal factors. Pape TLB, Kim J, Weiner B, Disabil Rehabil 2002 24 5 20 10.1080/09638280110066235 11827155 (Pubitemid 34105673)
15. Scherer MJ, Living in the state of stuck Massachusetts: Brookline books 2005
16. Combining qualitative and quantitative research designs: A methodological review. stlund U, Kidd L, Wengström Y, Rowa-Dewar N, Int J Nurs Stud 2011 48 369 383 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.10.005
17. Pope C, Mays N, Qualitative research in health care Massachusetts: BMJ Books: Blackwell Publishing 2006
18. Development of a direct weighting procedure for quality of life domains. Browne JP, O'Boyle CA, McGee HM, McDonald NJ, Joyce CR, Qual Life Res 1997 6 301 309 10.1023/A:1018423124390 9248312 (Pubitemid 27294724)
19. Factors that predict the post-discharge use of recommended assistive technology (AT). Wielandt T, Mckenna K, Tooth L, Strong J, Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2006 1 29 40 10.1080/09638280500167159 19256165
20. Non-use of provided assistive technology devices, a literature overview. Wessels RD, Dijcks BP, Soede M, Gelderblom GJ, de Witte LP, Technol Disabil 2003 15 231 238 (Pubitemid 38165427)