Patients' expectations and actual use of custom-made orthopaedic shoes

Clinical Rehabilitation

Volumn 24, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 919-927

  Van Netten, Jaap J ^a,b   Jannink, Michiel J A ^c   Hijmans, Juha M ^a,b   Geertzen, Jan H B ^a,b   Postema, Klaas ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANKLE; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOOT; FOOT DISEASE; FOOT INJURY; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHOTICS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SHOE;

ANKLE; COHORT STUDIES; COMMUNICATION; FEMALE; FOOT; FOOT DISEASES; FOOT INJURIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHOTIC DEVICES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SHOES;

EID: 77957309160     PISSN: 02692155     EISSN: 14770873     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0269215510367991     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Postema K., Toornend JLA, Zilvold G., Schaars AH Custom made orthopaedic shoes in the medical practice [in Dutch]. Houten / Antwerpen: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum, 1991.
2. Audit Commission. Fully equipped: the provision to older people or disabled people by the NHS and social services in England and Wales. London: Audit Commission, 2000.
3. GIP, College voor Zorgverzekeringen. Monitor medical devices [In Dutch]. [Updated: 2006 June 22; Cited: 2007 Oct 24]. Available from: http://www.cvz.nl/resources/rpt0606%20monitor%20hulpmiddelen-tcm28-21637.pdf
4. De Boer I., Peeters AJ, Ronday HK, Mertens BJ, Huizinga TW, Vliet Vlieland TP Assistive devices: usage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 2009 ; 28: 119-128.
5. Fisher LR, McLellan DL Questionnaire assessment of patient satisfaction with lower-limb orthoses from a district hospital. Prosthet Orthot Int 1989 ; 13: 29-35.
6. Jannink MJ, Ijzerman MJ, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K., Stewart RE, Groothoff JW, Lankhorst GJ Use of orthopedic shoes in patients with degenerative disorders of the foot. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005 ; 86: 687-692.
7. Philipsen AB, Ellitsgaard N., Krogsgaard MR, Sonne-Holm S. Patient compliance and effect of orthopaedic shoes. Prosthet Orthot Int 1999 ; 23: 59-62.
8. Pape TLB, Kim J., Weiner B. The shaping of individual meanings assigned to assistive technology: a review of personal factors. Disabil Rehabil 2002 ; 24: 5-20.
9. Scherer MJ Living in the state of stuck, 4 th edition. Massachusetts: Brookline Books, 2005.
10. Wessels RD, Dijcks BP, Soede M., Gelderblom GJ, de Witte LP Non-use of provided assistive technology devices, a literature overview. Technology and Disability 2003 ; 15: 231-238.
11. Jannink MJ, Ijzerman MJ, Mes CAJ, Groothoff JW, Lankhorst GJ Prediction of actual use of custom-made orthopaedic shoes in patients with degenerative disorders of the foot is not possible. In Jannink MJ, ed. Usability of custom-made orthopaedic shoes in patients with degenerative disorders of the foot. Enschede, 2004, 71-82.
12. Van Netten JJ, Hijmans JM, Jannink MJA, Geertzen JHB, Postema K. Development and reproducibility of a short questionnaire to measure use and usability of custom-made orthopaedic shoes. J Rehabil Med 2009 ; 41: 913-918.
13. Dijcks BPJ, de Witte LP, Gelderblom GJ, Wessels RD, Soede M. Non-use of assistive technology in the Netherlands: a non-issue? Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2006 ; 1: 97-102.
14. Phillips B., Zhao H. Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assist Technol 1993 ; 5: 36-45.
15. Wielandt T., Strong J. Compliance with prescribed adaptive equipment: a literature review. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 2000 ; 63: 65-75.
16. Kravitz RL, Callahan EJ, Azari R., Antonius D., Lewis CE Assessing patients' expectations in ambulatory medical practice. Does the measurement approach make a difference? J Gen Intern Med 1997 ; 12: 67-72.
17. Williams AE, Nester CJ, Ravey MI Rheumatoid arthritis patients' experiences of wearing therapeutic footwear - a qualitative investigation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2007 ; 8: 104.
18. Lenker JA, Paquet VL A new conceptual model for assistive technology outcomes research and practice. Assist Technol 2004 ; 16: 1-10.
19. Ajzen I. A theory of planned behavior. In Kuhl J, Beckman J, eds. Action-control: From cognition to behavior. Heidelberg: Springer, 1985, 11-39.
20. Rogers EM Diffusion of innovations, 5 th edition. New York: Free press, 2003.
21. Scherer MJ The change in emphasis from people to person: introduction to the special issue on Assistive Technology. Disabil Rehabil 2002 ; 24: 1-4.
22. Johnson M., Newton P., Jiwa M., Goyder E. Meeting the educational needs of people at risk of diabetes-related amputation: a vignette study with patients and professionals. Health Expect 2005 ; 8: 324-333.
23. Scherer MJ, Glueckauf RL Assessing the benefits of assistive technologies for activities and participation. Rehabil Psychol 2005 ; 50: 132-141.
24. Johnson M., Newton P., Goyder E. Patient and professional perspectives on prescribed therapeutic footwear for people with diabetes: a vignette study. Patient Educ Couns 2006 ; 64: 167-172.
25. Williams A., Meacher K. Shoes in the cupboard: the fate of prescribed footwear? Prosthet Orthot Int 2001 ; 25: 53-59.