A comparison of non-symmetric entropy-based classification trees and support vector machine for cardiovascular risk stratification

Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 79-82

  Singh, Anima ^a   Guttag, John V ^a  

^a Massachusetts Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CLASS IMBALANCE; CLASSIFICATION RULES; CLASSIFICATION TREE MODEL; CLASSIFICATION TREES; CLINICAL SETTINGS; COST-SENSITIVE; F-SCORE; LINEAR SVM; MEDICAL DATA SETS; OVER SAMPLING; RADIAL BASIS; RISK STRATIFICATION; SVM CLASSIFIERS; SVM-BASED CLASSIFIERS; TREE-BASED; TREE-BASED MODEL; UNDER-SAMPLING;

ALGORITHMS; ENTROPY; FORESTRY; MODELS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

TREES (MATHEMATICS);

ALGORITHMS; CLASSIFICATION; CLASSIFIERS; ENTROPY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; ARTICLE; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; ENTROPY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MORTALITY; PREVALENCE; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; REPRODUCIBILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; SURVIVAL; SURVIVAL RATE;

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; ENTROPY; HUMANS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PREVALENCE; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; SURVIVAL RATE;

EID: 84861935678     PISSN: 1557170X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6089901     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. J. R. Quinlan. C4.5: programs for machine learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, 1993.
2. L. Breiman, J. Friedman, R. Olshen, and C. Stone. Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth and Brooks, Monterey, CA, 1984.
3. T. Qureshi and D. A. Zighed. Using resampling techniques for better quality discretization. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Machine Learning and Data Mining in Pattern Recognition,MLDM '09, pages 68-81, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009. Springer-Verlag.
4. N.V. Chawla, K.W. Bowyer, L.O. Hall, and W.P. Kegelmeyer. SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 16(1):321-357, 2002.
5. Y. Tang, Y.Q. Zhang, N.V. Chawla, and S. Krasser. SVMs modeling for highly imbalanced classification. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on, 39(1):281-288, February 2009.
6. C. Cortes and V. Vapnik. Support-vector networks. Machine Learning, 20:273-297, 1995.
7. R. Akbani, S. Kwek, and N. Japkowicz. Applying support vector machines to imbalanced datasets. Machine Learning: ECML 2004, pages 39-50, 2004.
8. G. Wu and E.Y. Chang. KBA: kernel boundary alignment considering imbalanced data distribution. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 17(6):786-795, June 2005.
9. K. Morik, P. Brockhausen, and T. Joachims. Combining statistical learning with a knowledge-based approach-a case study in intensive care monitoring. In Proceedings of 16th ICML, pages 268-277. Citeseer, 1999.
10. A. Singh. Risk stratification of cardiovascular patients using a novel classification tree induction algorithm with non-symmetric entropy measures. Master of engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2011.
11. E. Bauer and R. Kohavi. An empirical comparison of voting classification algorithms: Bagging, boosting, and variants. In Machine Learning, pages 105-139, 1998.
12. A. Singh, J. Liu, and J. V. Guttag. Discretization of continuous ecg based risk metrics using asymmetric and warped entropy measures. 37:473-476, 2010.
13. S. Marcellin, D.A. Zighed, and G. Ritschard. Detection of breast cancer using an asymmetric entropy measure. In Computational Statistics, volume 25, pages 975-982. Springer, 2006.
14. W. Liu, S. Chawla, D.A. Cieslak, and N.V. Chawla. A robust decision tree algorithms for imbalanced data sets. In Proceedings of the Tenth SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, pages 766-777. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2010.
15. A. Bauer, J.W. Kantelhardt, P Barthel, R. Schneider, T. Mäkikallio, K. Ulm, K. Hnatkova, A. Schömig, H. Huikuri, Bunde A., M. Malik, and G. Schmidt. Deceleration capacity of heart rate as a predictor of mortality after myocardial infarction: cohort study. The Lancet, 367(9523):1674-81, May 2006.
16. M. Malik. Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Circulation, 93(5):1043-1065, March 1996.
17. Z. Syed, B. M. Scirica, and S. et. al. Mohanavelu. Relation of death within 90 days of non-st-elevation acute coronary syndromes to variability in electrocardiographic morphology. American Journal of Cardiology, 103(3):307-11, Feb 2009.
18. T. Joachims. Making large-scale support vector machine learning practical. Advances in kernel methods: support vector learning, pages 169-184, 1999.
19. E. Kreyszig. Introductory Mathematical Statistics. John Wiley, 1970.
20. F.Wilcoxon. Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods. Biometrics Bulletin, 1(6):80-83, 1945.