Prognostic value of cortically induced motor evoked activity by TMS in chronic stroke: Caveats from a revealing single clinical case

BMC Neurology

Volumn 12, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Amengual, Julià L ^a   Valero Cabré, Antoni ^c,d,e   de las Heras, Misericordia V ^a   Rojo, Nurja ^a,b   Froudist Walsh, Seán ^b,f,g   Ripollés, Pablo ^a,b   Bodammer, Nils ^h   Mohammadi, Bahram ^i,j   Montero, Jordi ^a   Grau, Carles ^a   Münte, Thomas F ⁱ   Rodríguez Fornells, Antoni ^a,b,k  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARI DE BELLVITGE   (Spain)

^c SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^d BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITAT OBERTA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

^f UNIVERSITY OF MÁLAGA   (Spain)

^g KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^h MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (Germany)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF LÜBECK   (Germany)

^j INTERNATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE INSTITUTE   (Germany)

^k INSTITUCIÓ CATALANA DE RECERCA I ESTUDIS AVANÇATS ICREA   (Spain)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLOPIDOGREL; ENALAPRIL;

ADULT; ARM MUSCLE; ARTICLE; BABINSKI REFLEX; CAPSULA INTERNA; CASE REPORT; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; FRONTAL CORTEX; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HAND MUSCLE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PROGNOSIS; PYRAMIDAL TRACT; STROKE; TENDON REFLEX; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CHRONIC DISEASE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION;

CHRONIC DISEASE; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT DISORDERS; PROGNOSIS; STROKE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

EID: 84861935371     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712377     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2377-12-35     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Delvaux V, Alagona G, Gërard P, De Pasqua V, Pennisi G, de Noordhout AM. Post-stroke reorganization of hand motor area: a 1-year prospective follow-up with focal transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2003, 114(7):1217-1225. 10.1016/S1388-2457(03)00070-1, 12842718.
2. Cramer SC. Stroke recovery: how the computer reprograms itself. Mol Med Today 2000, 6(8):301-303. 10.1016/S1357-4310(00)01744-5, 11041652.
3. Catano A, Houa M, Caroyer JM, Ducarne H, Noël P. Magnetic transcranial stimulation in non-haemorrhagic sylvian strokes: interest of facilitation for early functional prognosis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol/Electromyography and Motor Control 1995, 97(6):349-354.
4. Rossini PM, Pauri F. Neuromagnetic integrated methods tracking human brain mechanisms of sensorimotor areas 'plastic' reorganisation. Brain Res Rev 2000, 33(2-3):131-154.
5. Traversa R, Cicinelli P, Pasqualetti P, Filippi M, Rossini PM. Follow-up of interhemispheric differences of motor evoked potentials from the 'affected' and 'unaffected' hemispheres in human stroke. Brain Res 1998, 803(1-2):1-8.
6. Trompetto C, Assini A, Buccolieri A, Marchese R, Abbruzzese G. Motor recovery following stroke: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Clin Neurophysiol 2000, 111(10):1860-1867. 10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00419-3, 11018503.
7. Thickbroom GW, Byrnes ML, Archer SA, Mastaglia FL. Motor outcome after subcortical stroke correlates with the degree of cortical reorganization. Clin Neurophysiol 2004, 115(9):2144-2150. 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.04.001, 15294217.
8. Stinear CM, Barber PA, Smale PR, Coxon JP, Fleming MK, Byblow WD. Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity. Brain 2007, 130(1):170-180.
9. Rossini PM, Calautti C, Pauri F, Baron J-C. Post-stroke plastic reorganisation in the adult brain. Lancet Neurol 2003, 2(8):493-502. 10.1016/S1474-4422(03)00485-X, 12878437.
10. Marshall RS, Perera GM, Lazar RM, Krakauer JW, Constantine RC, DeLaPaz RL. Evolution of cortical activation during recovery from corticospinal tract infarction. Stroke 2000, 31(3):656-661. 10.1161/01.STR.31.3.656, 10700500.
11. Loubinoux I, Carel C, Pariente J, Dechaumont S, Albucher J-F, Marque P, et al. Correlation between cerebral reorganization and motor recovery after subcortical infarcts. NeuroImage 2003, 20(4):2166-2180. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.08.017, 14683720.
12. Conturo TE, Lori NF, Cull TS, Akbudak E, Snyder AZ, Shimony JS, et al. Tracking neuronal fiber pathways in the living human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1999, 96(18):10422-10427. 10.1073/pnas.96.18.10422, 17904, 10468624.
13. Le Bihan D. Looking into the functional architecture of the brain with diffusion MRI. Nat Rev Neurosci 2003, 4(6):469-480. 10.1038/nrn1119, 12778119.
14. Lyle RC. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res 1981, 4(4):483-492. 10.1097/00004356-198112000-00001, 7333761.
15. Wade DT, Langton-Hewer R, Wood VA, Skilbeck CE, Ismail HM. The hemiplegic arm after stroke: measurement and recovery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1983, 46(6):521-524. 10.1136/jnnp.46.6.521, 1027442, 6875585.
16. Mathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N, Weber K. Adult norms for the box and block test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther 1985, 39(6):5.
17. Parker VM, Wade DT, Hewer RL. Loss of arm function after stroke: measurement, frequency, and recovery. Disabil Rehabil 1986, 8(2):69-73.
18. Oxford Grice K, Vogel KA, Le V, Mitchell A, Muniz S, Vollmer MA. Adult Norms for a Commercially Available Nine Hole Peg Test for Finger Dexterity. Am J Occup Ther 2003, 57(5):570-573. 10.5014/ajot.57.5.570, 14527120.
19. Hermsdörfer J, Goldenberg G. Ipsilesional deficits during fast diadochokinetic hand movements following unilateral brain damage. Neuropsychologia 2002, 40(12):2100-2115. 10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00048-9, 12208006.
20. Rossini PM, Barker AT, Berardelli A, Caramia MD, Caruso G, Cracco RQ, et al. Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994, 91(2):79-92. 10.1016/0013-4694(94)90029-9, 7519144.
21. Daskalakis ZJ, Molnar GF, Christensen BK, Sailer A, Fitzgerald PB, Chen R. An automated method to determine the transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced contralateral silent period. Clin Neurophysiol 2003, 114(5):938-944. 10.1016/S1388-2457(03)00038-5, 12738441.
22. Wassermann EM, McShane LM, Hallett M, Cohen LG. Noninvasive mapping of muscle representations in human motor cortex. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol/Evoked Potentials Section 1992, 85(1):1-8.
23. Mills KR. Plasticity in the human neurvous system. Investigations with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. Brain 2004, 127(5):1212-1213.
24. Friston KJ, Frith CD, Fletcher P, Liddle PF, Frackowiak RSJ. Functional topography: multidimensional scaling and functional connectivity in the brain. Cereb Cortex 1996, 6(2):156-164. 10.1093/cercor/6.2.156, 8670646.
25. Maldjian JA, Laurienti PJ, Kraft RA, Burdette JH. An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets. NeuroImage 2003, 19(3):1233-1239. 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00169-1, 12880848.
26. Smith SM. Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp 2002, 17(3):143-155. 10.1002/hbm.10062, 12391568.
27. Woolrich MW, Jbabdi S, Patenaude B, Chappell M, Makni S, Behrens T, et al. Bayesian analysis of neuroimaging data in FSL. NeuroImage 2009, 45(1, Supplement 1):S173-S186. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.055, 19059349.
28. Liepert J, Uhde I, Gräf S, Leidner O, Weiller C. Motor cortex plasticity during forced-use therapy in stroke patients: a preliminary study. J Neurol 2001, 248(4):315-321. 10.1007/s004150170207, 11374097.
29. Schiemanck S, Kwakkel G, Post MW, Kappelle JL, Preve AJ. Impact of internal capsule lesions on outcome of motor hand function at one year post-stroke. J Rehabil Med 2008, 40(2):96-101. 10.2340/16501977-0130, 18509572.
30. Liepert J, Restemeyer C, Kucinski T, Zittel S, Weiller C. Motor strokes. Stroke 2005, 36(12):2648. 10.1161/01.STR.0000189629.10603.02, 16269647.
31. Klöppel S, Bäumer T, Kroeger J, Koch MA, Büchel C, Münchau A, et al. The cortical motor threshold reflects microstructural properties of cerebral white matter. NeuroImage 2008, 40(4):1782-1791. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.019, 18342540.
32. Hübers A, Klein JC, Kang J-S, Hilker R, Ziemann U. The relationship between TMS measures of functional properties and DTI measures of microstructure of the corticospinal tract. Brain Stimul 2011, in press.
33. Qazi AA, Radmanesh A, O'Donnell L, Kindlmann G, Peled S, Whalen S, et al. Resolving crossings in the corticospinal tract by two-tensor streamline tractography: Method and clinical assessment using fMRI. NeuroImage 2009, 47(Supplement 2(0)):T98-T106. 2746909, 18657622.
34. Classen J, Schnitzler A, Binkofski F, Werhahn KJ, Kim YS, Kessler KR, et al. The motor syndrome associated with exaggerated inhibition within the primary motor cortex of patients with hemiparetic. Brain 1997, 120(4):605-619. 10.1093/brain/120.4.605, 9153123.
35. Talelli P, Greenwood RJ, Rothwell JC. Arm function after stroke: Neurophysiological correlates and recovery mechanisms assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2006, 117(8):1641-1659. 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.01.016, 16595189.
36. Doyon J, Bellec P, Amsel R, Penhune V, Monchi O, Carrier J, et al. Contributions of the basal ganglia and functionally related brain structures to motor learning. Behav Brain Res 2009, 199(1):61-75. 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.11.012, 19061920.
37. Dobkin BH, Functional MRI. A potential physiologic indicator for stroke rehabilitation interventions. Stroke 2003, 34(5):e26-e28.
38. Shimizu T, Nariai T, Maehara T, Hino T, Komori T, Shimizu H, et al. Enhanced motor cortical excitability in the unaffected hemisphere after hemispherectomy. Neuroreport 2000, 11(14):3077-3084. 10.1097/00001756-200009280-00009, 11043527.
39. Hallett M. Functional reorganization after lesions of the human brain: studies with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Rev Neurol 2001, 157(8-9 Pt 1):822-826.
40. Kamida T, Baba H, Ono K, Yonekura M, Fujiki M, Kobayashi H. Usefulness of magnetic motor evoked potentials in the surgical treatment of hemiplegic patients with intractable epilepsy. Seizure 2003, 12(6):373-378. 10.1016/S1059-1311(02)00339-4, 12915083.
41. Pilato F, Dileone M, Capone F, Profice P, Caulo M, Battaglia D, et al. Unaffected motor cortex remodeling after hemispherectomy in an epileptic cerebral palsy patient. A TMS and fMRI study. Epilepsy Res 2009, 85(2-3):243-251.
42. Sun W, Fu W, Wang D, Wang Y. Ipsilateral responses of motor evoked potential correlated with the motor functional outcomes after cortical resection. Int J Psychophysiol 2009, 73(3):377-382. 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.06.001, 19559057.
43. Dormont JF, Farin D, Schmied A, Amalric M. Cat red nucleus activity preceding movement depends on initiation conditions. Exp Brain Res 1989, 77(2):271-282. 10.1007/BF00274984, 2792275.
44. Iwaniuk AN, Whishaw IQ. On the origin of skilled forelimb movements. Trends Neurosci 2000, 23(8):372-376. 10.1016/S0166-2236(00)01618-0, 10906801.
45. Dancause N, Barbay S, Frost SB, Plautz EJ, Chen D, Zoubina EV, et al. Extensive cortical rewiring after brain injury. J Neurosci 2005, 25(44):10167-10179. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3256-05.2005, 16267224.
46. Sadato N, Campbell G, Ibanez V, Deiber M, Hallett M. Complexity affects regional cerebral blood flow change during sequential finger movements. J Neurosci 1996, 16(8):2691-2700.
47. Hummel F, Kirsammer R, Gerloff C. Ipsilateral cortical activation during finger sequences of increasing complexity: representation of movement difficulty or memory load?. Clin Neurophysiol 2003, 114(4):605-613. 10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00417-0, 12686269.
48. Logothetis NK. The neural basis of the blood-oxygen-level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging signal. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2002, 357(1424):1003-1037. 10.1098/rstb.2002.1114, 1693017, 12217171.
49. Waldvogel D, van Gelderen P, Muellbacher W, Ziemann U, Immisch I, Hallett M. The relative metabolic demand of inhibition and excitation. Nature 2000, 406(6799):995-998. 10.1038/35023171, 10984053.
50. Roick H, Giesen HJ, Benecke R. On the origin of the postexcitatory inhibition seen after transcranial magnetic brain stimulation in awake human subjects. Exp Brain Res 1993, 94(3):489-498.
51. Triggs WJ, Cros D, Macdonell RAL, Chiappa KH, Fang J, Day BJ. Cortical and spinal motor excitability during the transcranial magnetic stimulation silent period in humans. Brain Res 1993, 628(1-2):39-48.
52. Classen J, Benecke R. Inhibitory phenomena in individual motor units induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol/Electromyography and Motor Control 1995, 97(5):264-274.