Erratum to Using the Criterion-Predictor Factor Model to Compute the Probability of Detecting Prediction Bias with Ordinary Least Squares Regression (Psychometrika, (2012), 77, (561-580), 10.1007/s11336-012-9270-8);Using the Criterion-Predictor Factor Model to Compute the Probability of Detecting Prediction Bias with Ordinary Least Squares Regression

Psychometrika

Volumn 77, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 561-580

  Culpepper, Steven Andrew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

measurement bias; power; prediction bias; selection; type I error

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861894498     PISSN: 00333123     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11336-013-9345-1     Document Type: Erratum

References (44)

1. AERA, APA, NCME (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington: American Educational Research Association.
2. Aguinis, H., Boik, R. J., & Pierce, C. A. (2001). A generalized solution for approximating the power to detect effects of categorical moderator variables using multiple regression. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 291-323.
3. Aguinis, H., Boik, R. J., Pierce, C. A., & Beaty, J. C. (2005). Effect size and power in assessing moderating effects of categorical variables using multiple regression: a 30-year review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 94-107.
4. Aguinis, H., Culpepper, S. A., & Pierce, C. A. (2010). Revival of test bias research in preemployment testing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 648-680.
5. Aguinis, H., & Stone-Romero, E. F. (1997). Methodological artifacts in moderated multiple regression and their effects on statistical power. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 192-206.
6. Aitkin, M. (1964). Correlation in a singly truncated bivariate normal distribution. Psychometrika, 29, 263-270.
7. Arnold, B. C., Beaver, R. J., Groeneveld, R. A., & Meeker, W. Q. (1993). The nontruncated marginal of a truncated bivariate normal distribution. Psychometrika, 58, 471-488.
8. Balakkrishnan, N., & Lai, C. (2009). Continuous bivariate distributions. New York: Springer.
9. Barr, D. R., & Sherrill, E. T. (1999). Mean and variance of truncated normal distributions. The American Statistician, 53, 357-361.
10. Bartlett, C. J., Bobko, P., Mosier, S. B., & Hannan, R. (1978). Testing for fairness with a moderated regression strategy: an alternative to differential analysis. Personnel Psychology, 31, 233-241.
11. Birnbaum, Z. W., Paulson, E., & Andrews, F. C. (1950). On the effect of selection performed on some coordinates of a multi-dimensional population. Psychometrika, 15, 191-204.
12. Borsboom, D., Romeijn, J., & Wicherts, J. M. (2008). Measurement invariance versus selection invariance: is fair selection possible? Psychological Methods, 13, 75-98.
13. Cleary, T. A. (1968). Test bias: prediction of grades of Negro and White students in integrated colleges. Journal of Educational Measurement, 5, 115-124.
14. Culpepper, S. A. (2010). Studying individual differences in predictability with gamma regression and nonlinear multilevel models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45, 153-185.
15. Culpepper, S. A. (in press). Evaluating EIV, OLS, and SEM estimators of group slope differences in the presence of measurement error: the single indicator case. Applied Psychological Measurement.
16. Culpepper, S. A., & Aguinis, H. (2011). Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with fallible covariates. Psychological Methods, 16, 166-178.
17. Culpepper, S. A., & Davenport, E. C. (2009). Assessing differential prediction of college grades by race/ethnicity with a multilevel model. Journal of Educational Measurement, 46, 220-242.
18. DeCorte, W., Lievens, F., & Sackett, P. R. (2007). Combining predictors to achieve optimal trade-offs between selection quality and adverse impact. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1380-1393.
19. Dorans, N. J. (2004). Using subpopulation invariance to assess test score equity. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 43-68.
20. Finch, D. M., Edwards, B. D., & Wallace, J. C. (2009). Multistage selection strategies: simulating the effects on adverse impact and expected performance for various predictor combinations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 318-340.
21. Gratz v. Bollinger (2003). 539 U. S. 244.
22. Grutter v. Bollinger (2003). 539 U. S. 306.
23. Holmes, D. J. (1990). The robustness of the usual correction for restriction in range due to explicit selection. Psychometrika, 55, 19-32.
24. Humphreys, L. (1952). Individual differences. Annual Review of Psychology, 3, 131-150.
25. Humpreys, L. G. (1986). An analysis and evaluation of test and item bias in the prediction context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 327-333.
26. Kuncel, N. R., Hezlett, S. A., & Ones, D. S. (2001). A comprehensive meta-analysis of the predictive validity of the graduate record examinations: implications for graduate student selection and performance. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 162-181.
27. Lautenschlager, G. J., & Mendoza, J. L. (1986). A step-down hierarchical multiple regression analysis for examining hypotheses about test bias in prediction. Applied Psychological Measurement, 10, 133-139.
28. Lawley, D. N. (1943). A note on Karl Pearson's selection formulae. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. Section A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences62, 28-30.
29. Linn, R. L. (1983). Pearson selection formulas: implications for studies of predictive bias and estimates of educational effects in selected samples. Journal of Educational Measurement, 20, 1-15.
30. Linn, R. L. (1984). Selection bias: multiple meanings. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 33-47.
31. Linn, R. L., & Werts, C. E. (1971). Considerations for studies of test bias. Journal of Educational Measurement, 8, 1-4.
32. Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis, and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525-543.
33. Millsap, R. E. (1997). Invariance in measurement and prediction: their relationship in the single-factor case. Psychological Methods, 2, 248-260.
34. Millsap, R. E. (1998). Group differences in regression intercepts: implications for factorial invariance. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33, 403-424.
35. Millsap, R. E. (2007). Invariance in measurement and prediction revisited. Psychometrika, 72, 461-473.
36. Millsap, R. E., & Kwok, O. M. (2004). Evaluating the impact of partial factorial invariance on selection in two populations. Psychological Methods, 9, 93-115.
37. Muthen, B. (1990). Moments of the censored and truncated bivariate normal distribution. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 43, 131-143.
38. Pearson, K. (1903). Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution-xi. On the influence of natural selection on the variability and correlation of organs. Philosophical Transactions, CC.-A 321, 1-66.
39. Ricci v. DeStefano (2009). 557 U. S. 244.
40. Rosenbaum, S. (1961). Moments of a truncated bivariate normal distribution. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B. Methodological, 23, 405-408.
41. Saad, S., & Sackett, P. R. (2002). Investigating differential prediction by gender in employment-oriented personality measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 667-674.
42. SIOP (2003). Principles for the validation and use of personnel selection procedures (4th ed.). Bowling Green: Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Inc.
43. Wicherts, J. M., & Millsap, R. E. (2009). The absence of underprediction does not imply the absence of measurement bias. The American Psychologist, 64, 281-283.
44. Young, J. W. (2001). Differential validity, differential prediction, and college admission testing: a comprehensive review and analysis (Research Report No. 6). College Entrance Examination Board.