Nurses' perceptions of patient participation in hemodialysis treatment

Nursing Ethics

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 419-430

  Aasen, Elin Margrethe ^a   Kvangarsnes, Marit ^a   Heggen, Kåre ^b  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b VOLDA UNIVERSITY COLLEGE   (Norway)

Author keywords

critical discourse analysis; elderly; Hemodialysis; next of kin; patient participation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BEHAVIOR; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; ELDERLY CARE; ETHICS; FAMILY NURSING; FEMALE; HEMODIALYSIS; HUMAN; KIDNEY FAILURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NORWAY; NURSE PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; NURSE PRACTITIONER; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY; REVIEW; STANDARD; STATISTICS; TIME;

ADULT; AGED; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FAMILY NURSING; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES FOR THE AGED; HEMODIALYSIS UNITS, HOSPITAL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NORWAY; NURSE PRACTITIONERS; NURSE-PATIENT RELATIONS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; POWER (PSYCHOLOGY); PROFESSIONAL AUTONOMY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RENAL DIALYSIS; RENAL INSUFFICIENCY; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84861882286     PISSN: 09697330     EISSN: 14770989     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0969733011429015     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Pasientrettighetsloven [Law on patients' rights]. Oslo: Ministry of Health and Social Affairs. http://www.lovdata.no/all/hl-19990702-063.html#3- (2001, accessed 01 February 2011).
2. Stortingsmelding Nr. 25 Mestring, muligheter og mening [White paper no. 25. Coping, possibility and meaning]. Oslo: Ministry of Health and Social Affairs. http://www.regjeringen.no/nb/dep/hod/dok/regpubl/stmeld/20052006/stmeld-nr-25-2005-2006-.html(2005, accesssed 01 February 2011).
3. Helsepersonelloven [Health care personal act] (2001). Oslo: Ministry of Health and Social Affairs. http://www.lovdata.no/all/hl-19990702-064.html#4(2001, accessed 01 February 2011).
4. Collins S,Britten N,Ruusuvuori J,Thompson APatient participation in health care consultations. Qualitative perspectives. New York: Open University Press; 2007:.
5. Beauchamp T,Childress JFPrinciples of biomedical ethics. 6th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.New York: Oxford University Press; 2009:.
6. Sahlsten MJ,Larsson IE,Sjostrom B,Plos KA.An analysis of the concept of patient participation.Nurs Forum. 2008;43:2-11.
7. Thompson AGH.The meaning of patient involvement and participation in healthcare consultations: A taxonomy.Soc Sci Med. 2007;64:1297-1310.
8. Hook ML.Partnering with patients - a concept ready for action.J Adv Nurs. 2006;56:133-143.
9. Larsson IE,Sahlsten MJ,Sjostrom B,Lindencrona CS,Plos KA.Patient participation in nursing care from a patient perspective: a Grounded Theory study.Scand J Caring Sci. 2007;21:313-320.
10. Tutton EM.Patient participation on a ward for frail older people.J Adv Nurs. 2005;50:143-152.
11. Larsson IE,Sahlsten MJ,Segesten K,Plos KA.Patients' perceptions of barriers for participation in nursing care.Scand J Caring Sci. 2011;:.
12. Sahlsten MJ,Larsson IE,Plos KA, et al.Hindrance for patient participation in nursing care.Scand J Caring Sci. 2005;19 (3): 223-229.
13. Sahlsten M,Larsson IE,Sjöström B,Plos KA.Nurses' strategies for optimising patient participation in nursing care.Scand J Caring Sci. 2009;23:490-497.
14. Sahlsten MJ,Larsson IE,Sjöström B,Lindencrona CS,Plos KA.Patient participation in nursing care: towards a concept clarification from a nurse perspective.J Clin Nurs. 2007;16:630-637.
15. Logan SM,Pelletier-Hibbert M,Hodgins M.Stressors and coping of in-hospital haemodialysis patients aged 65 years and over.J Adv Nurs. 2006;56:382-391.
16. McCann K,Boore JR.Fatigue in persons with renal failure who require maintenance haemodialysis.J Adv Nurs. 2000;32:1132-1142.
17. Brown WW.Hemodialysis in elderly patients.Int Urol Nephrol. 2000;32:127-135.
18. Kimmel PL.Depression in patients with chronic renal disease: what we know and what we need to know.J Psychosom Res. 2002;53:951-956.
19. Bevan MT.Dialysis as 'deus ex machina': a critical analysis of haemodialysis.J Adv Nurs. 2000;31:437-443.
20. Bevan MT.Nursing in the dialysis unit: technological enframing and declining art, or an imperative for caring.J Adv Nurs. 1998;27:730-736.
21. Halvorsen K,Sletteb Å,Nortvedt P, et al.Priority dilemmas in dialysis: the impact of old age.J Med Ethics. 2008;34:585-589.
22. Murray MA,Brunier G,Chung JO, et al.A systematic review of factors influencing decision-making in adults living with chronic kidney disease.Patient Educ Couns. 2009;76:149-158.
23. Noble H,Kelly D,Rawling-Anderson K,Meyer J.A concept analysis of renal supportive care: the changing world of nephrology.J Adv Nurs. 2007;59:644-653.
24. Baharoon SA,Al-Jahdali HH,Al-Sayyari AA, et al.Factors associated with decision-making about end-of-life care by hemodialysis patients.Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2010;21:447-453.
25. Silen M,Svantesson M,Ahlstrøm G.Nurses' conceptions of decision making concerning life-sustaining treatment.Nurs Ethics. 2008;15:160-173.
26. Murtagh FE,Marsh JE,Donohoe P, et al.Dialysis or not? A comparative survival study of patients over 75 years with chronic kidney disease stage 5.Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007;22 (7): 1955-1962.
27. Hermsen M,van der Donk M.Nurses' morals problems in dialysis.Nurs Ethics. 2009;16:160-173.
28. Dierckx de Casterlè B,Izumi S,Godfrey N,Denhaerynck K.Nurses' responses to ethical dilemmas in nursing practice: meta-analysis.J Adv Nurs. 2008;63:540-549.
29. Fairclough NDiscourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity; 1992:.
30. Fairclough NAnalysing discourse: textual analysis for social research. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group; 2003:.
31. Fairclough NLanguage and power. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Longman Group, 2001.Edinburgh: Longman Group; 2001:.
32. Handbook of quality research. Schwandt TDenzin NLincoln Y, ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2000:189-215.
33. Gadow SPerspectives on nursing theory. Reed PGShearer NC andNicoll LH, ed. London: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004:375-385.
34. Polkinghorne DENarrative knowing and the human sciences. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press; 1988:.
35. Mishler EGNarrative psychology: the storied nature of human conduct. Sarbin TR, ed. New York: Praeger; 1986:66-117.
36. Fontana A,Frey JHHandbook of qualitative research. Denzin NLincoln Y, ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2000:645-673.