메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 344, Issue 7859, 2012, Pages

Comparing risk prediction models: Should be routine when deriving a new model for the same purpose

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; CALIBRATION; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATA BASE; DIAGNOSIS; DISEASES; EDITORIAL; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PATIENT CARE; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; VALIDATION STUDY; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; HUMAN; NOTE; THEORETICAL MODEL;

EID: 84861872921     PISSN: 17561833     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e3186     Document Type: Editorial
Times cited : (91)

References (12)
  • 2
    • 67650082402 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Prognosis and prognostic research: Validating a prognostic model
    • Altman DG, Vergouwe Y, Royston P, Moons KGM. Prognosis and prognostic research: validating a prognostic model. BMJ 2009;338:b605.
    • (2009) BMJ , vol.338
    • Altman, D.G.1    Vergouwe, Y.2    Royston, P.3    Moons, K.G.M.4
  • 3
    • 84861842176 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Comparisons of established risk prediction models for cardiovascular disease: Systematic review
    • Siontis GCM, Tzoulaki I, Siontis KC, Ioannidis JPA. Comparisons of established risk prediction models for cardiovascular disease: systematic review. BMJ 2012;344:3318.
    • (2012) BMJ , vol.344 , pp. 3318
    • Siontis, G.C.M.1    Tzoulaki, I.2    Siontis, K.C.3    Ioannidis, J.P.A.4
  • 4
    • 52949100612 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Validation, updating and impact of clinical prediction rules: A review
    • Toll DB, Janssen KJ, Vergouwe Y, Moons KG. Validation, updating and impact of clinical prediction rules: a review. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:1085-94.
    • (2008) J Clin Epidemiol , vol.61 , pp. 1085-1094
    • Toll, D.B.1    Janssen, K.J.2    Vergouwe, Y.3    Moons, K.G.4
  • 6
    • 47549099190 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reporting bias in diagnostic and prognostic studies: Time for action
    • DOI 10.1373/clinchem.2008.108993
    • Rifai N, Altman DG, Bossuyt PM. Reporting bias in diagnostic and prognostic studies: time for action. Clin Chem 2008;54:1101-3. (Pubitemid 352009682)
    • (2008) Clinical Chemistry , vol.54 , Issue.7 , pp. 1101-1103
    • Rifai, N.1    Altman, D.G.2    Bossuyt, P.M.3
  • 7
    • 67650089602 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Prognosis and prognostic research: Application and impact of prognostic models in clinical practice
    • Moons KGM, Altman DG, Vergouwe Y, Royston P. Prognosis and prognostic research: application and impact of prognostic models in clinical practice. BMJ 2009;338:b606.
    • (2009) BMJ , vol.338
    • Moons, K.G.M.1    Altman, D.G.2    Vergouwe, Y.3    Royston, P.4
  • 8
    • 33748567372 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Accuracy and impact of risk assessment in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: A systematic review
    • DOI 10.1136/hrt.2006.087932
    • Brindle P, Beswick A, Fahey T, Ebrahim S. Accuracy and impact of risk assessment in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review. Heart 2006;92:1752-59. (Pubitemid 44851316)
    • (2006) Heart , vol.92 , Issue.12 , pp. 1752-1759
    • Brindle, P.1    Beswick, A.2    Fahey, T.3    Ebrahim, S.4
  • 9
    • 80052567230 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Developing risk prediction models for type 2 diabetes: A systematic review of methodology and reporting
    • Collins GS, Mallett S, Omar O, Yu LM. Developing risk prediction models for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of methodology and reporting. BMC Med 2011;9:103.
    • (2011) BMC Med , vol.9 , pp. 103
    • Collins, G.S.1    Mallett, S.2    Omar, O.3    Yu, L.M.4
  • 10
    • 84861851425 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Opening up multivariable prediction models: Consensus-based guidelines for transparent reporting
    • Collins GS. Opening up multivariable prediction models: consensus-based guidelines for transparent reporting. BMJ Blogs 2011; http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/ 2011/08/03/gary-collinsopening- up-multivariable-prediction-models/.
    • (2011) BMJ Blogs
    • Collins, G.S.1
  • 11
    • 33750905259 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Decision curve analysis: A novel method for evaluating prediction models
    • DOI 10.1177/0272989X06295361
    • Vickers AJ, Elkin EB. Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Med Decis Making 2006;26:565-74. (Pubitemid 44728772)
    • (2006) Medical Decision Making , vol.26 , Issue.6 , pp. 565-574
    • Vickers, A.J.1    Elkin, E.B.2
  • 12
    • 84860159431 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Risk prediction models: II. External validation, model updating, and impact assessment
    • Moons KG, Kengne AP, Grobbee DE, Royston P, Vergouwe Y, Altman DG, et al. Risk prediction models: II. External validation, model updating, and impact assessment. Heart 2012;98:691-8.
    • (2012) Heart , vol.98 , pp. 691-698
    • Moons, K.G.1    Kengne, A.P.2    Grobbee, D.E.3    Royston, P.4    Vergouwe, Y.5    Altman, D.G.6


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.