Evaluation of anti-ulcer effect of amlodipine in gastric ulcer models in rats

Indian Journal of Pharmacology

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 387-389

  Patil, Amol N ^a   Advani, Manjari G ^a   Mali, S N ^a   Pawar, Sudhir ^a   Raut, Sanket B ^a  

^a LOKMANYA TILAK MUNICIPAL GENERAL HOSPITAL   (India)

Author keywords

Amlodipine; ranitidine; ulcer index

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; AMLODIPINE; INDOMETACIN; RANITIDINE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANTIULCER ACTIVITY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVALUATION; NONHUMAN; PYLORUS LIGATION; RAT; STOMACH PH; STOMACH SECRETION; STOMACH ULCER; STOMACH VOLUME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84861847422     PISSN: 02537613     EISSN: 19983751     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/0253-7613.96344     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Brunton LL. Agents for control of Gastric acidity and treatment of peptic ulcer. In: Hardman JE, Limbard LE, editors. Goodman and Gilman's: The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 9th ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 1996. p. 901-15.
2. Valle JD. Peptic ulcer disease and related disorders. In: Fauci AS, Braunwald E, Kasper DL, Longo DL, Hauser SL, Jameson JL, et al., editors. Harrison's Principal of Internal Medicine. 17th ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 2008. p. 1746-62.
3. Nemeroff CB, Hernandez DE, Orlando RC, Prange AJ. Cytoprotective effect of centrally administered neurotensin on stress-induced gastric ulcers. Am J Physiol 1982;242: G342-6.
4. Bhave AL, Bhatt JD, Hemavathi KG. Antiulcer effect of Amlodipine and its interaction with H2 blocker and proton pump inhibitor in pylorus ligated rats. Indian J Pharmacol 2006;38:403-7.
5. Jain SM, Parmar NS, Santani DD. Gastric antiulcer activity of calcium channel blockers in rats. Indian J Pharmacol 1994;26:29-34.
6. Kilic FS, Sirmagul B, Batu O, Erol K. Dose dependent effects of Verapamil on ethanol-induced gastric lesions in rats. J Health Sci 2006;52:781-6.
7. Vogel GH, Vogel WH, Scholkens BA, Sandow J, Muller G, Vogel WF. J.3.7. Antiulcer activity. Drug discovery and evaluation. Pharmacological assays. 2nd ed. Berlin:Springer-Verlag; p.867-71.
8. Parmar NS, Desai JK. Review of current methodology of evaluation of gastric and duodenal antiulcer agents. Indian J Pharmacol 1993;25:120-35.
9. Ogle CW, Cho CH, Tong MC, Koo MW. The influence of verapamil on the gastric effects of stress in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 1985;112:399-404.
10. Zhang X, Kichuk MR, Mital S, Oz M, Michler R, Nasjletti A, et al. Amlodipine promotes kinin-mediated nitric oxide production in coronary microvessels of failing human hearts. Am J Cardiol 1999;84:27-33.
11. Smirnov IV, Oslopov VN, Bilich IL, Mendelevich VD. [The epidemiological aspects of combined arterial hypertension and peptic ulcer]. Ter Arkh 1990;62:48-50. (Russian).
12. Ramakrishnan K, Salinas RC. Peptic ulcer disease. Am Fam Physician 2007;76:1005-12.
13. Pilotto A, Franceschi M, Leandro G, Di Mario F; Geriatric Gastroenterology Study Group (Societè Italiana Gerontologie Geriatria). NSAID and aspirin use by the elderly in general practice: effect on gastrointestinal symptoms and therapies. Drugs Aging 2003;20:701-10.
14. Ostrowski J, Pesta J, Linnik D, Butruk E. The influence of calcium antagonists (verapamil, nifedipine, and MgCl2) on rat gastric damage induced by ethanol in vivo and in vitro. J Physiol Pharmacol 1993;44:273-81.
15. Mandal S, Roy RK, Das HN, Aditya GN, Chattopadhyay RN, Lahiri HL, et al. Potentiation of gastric antiulcer effect of famotidine by calcium channel blockers in rats. Indian J Pharmacol 1998;30:390-3.