Water resource management in New Zealand: Jobs or algal blooms?

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 109, Issue , 2012, Pages 33-42

  Marsh, Dan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Choice modelling; Employment; Non market valuation; Water quality

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CATCHMENTS; COST EFFECTIVENESS; DECISION MAKING; FARMS; PROFITABILITY; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER QUALITY;

ALGAL BLOOMS; CHOICE MODEL; DAIRY INDUSTRY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENTS; INDUSTRY PROFITABILITY; JOB LOSS; NEW ZEALAND; NON-MARKET VALUATION; WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS; WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT;

EMPLOYMENT;

ALGAL BLOOM; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DAIRY FARMING; EMPLOYMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; POLICY MAKING; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; PROFITABILITY; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; VALUATION; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER QUALITY; WATER RESOURCE; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; COST; DAIRY INDUSTRY; EMPLOYMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH; FEE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; NEW ZEALAND; POLICY; SWIMMING; UNEMPLOYMENT; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER QUALITY;

NEW ZEALAND; NORTH ISLAND; WAIKATO;

ALGAE;

EID: 84861828739     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: 10958630     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.04.026     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Adamowicz W., Boxall P., Williams M., Louviere J. Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: choice experiments and contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1998, 80:64-75.
2. Bateman I.J., Day B.H., Georgiou S., Lake I. The aggregation of environmental benefit values: welfare measures, distance decay and total WTP. Ecological Economics 2006, 60:450-460.
3. Bateman I.J., Lovett A.A., Brainard J.S. Applied Environmental Economics: A GIS Approach to Cost-Benefit Analysis 2005, Cambridge.
4. Bell B., Yap M. The Rotorua Lakes. Evaluation of Less Tangible Values 2004, Nimmo-Bell & Company, Wellington.
5. Birol E., Cox V. Using choice experiments to design wetland management programmes: the case of Severn Estuary wetland, UK. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 2007, 50:363-380.
6. Birol E., Karousakis K., Koundouri P. Using a choice experiment to account for preference heterogeneity in wetland attributes: the case of Cheimaditida wetland in Greece. Ecological Economics 2006, 60:145-156.
7. Blamey R.K. Citizens, consumers and contingent valuation: clarification and the expression of citizen values and issue-opinions. Forestry, Economics and the Environment 1996, CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon. W. Adamowicz, P. Boxall, M. Luckert, W. Phillips, W. White (Eds.).
8. Blamey R.K., Bennett J.W., Louviere J.J., Morrison M.D., Rolfe J. A test of policy labels in environmental choice modelling studies. Ecological Economics 2000, 32:269-286.
9. Blamey R.K., Rolfe J., Bennett J.W., Morrison M. Environmental Choice Modelling: Issues and Qualitative Insights 1997, Research Report No. 4, School of Economics and Management, University College, The University of New South Wales, Canberra.
10. Borghi J. Aggregation rules for cost-benefit analysis: a health economics perspective. Health Economics 2008, 17:863-875.
11. Boxall P.C., Adamowicz W.L., Swait J., Williams M., Louviere J. A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation. Ecological Economics 1996, 18:243-253.
12. Broadnax R. The environment Waikato approach to managing agriculture's impact on the environment. Primary Industry Management 2006, 9:7-10.
13. Brownstone D., Train K. Forecasting new product penetration with flexible substitution patterns. Journal of Econometrics 1999, 89:109-129.
14. Caparros A., Oviedo J.L., Campos P. Would you choose your preferred option? Comparing choice and recoded ranking experiments. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2008, 90:843-855.
15. Colombo S., Hanley N., Requena J.-C. Designing policy for reducing the off-farm effects of soil erosion using choice experiments. Journal of Agricultural Economics 2005, 56(1):81-96.
16. DairyNZ DairyNZ Economic Survey 2007-08 2009.
17. Environment Waikato Report to Policy and Strategy Committee. Update Re: Land Use Changes in the Waikato Catchment Between Taupo Gates and Karapiro 2005, Environment Waikato.
18. Harrington A. The Contribution of the Primary Sector to New Zealand's Economic Growth 2005, The Treasury.
19. Harris B. Valuation of Non Market Goods: An Application of Contingent Valuation to Water Pollution Control in the Waikato Basin 1983, Waikato Valley Authority.
20. Harris B.S., Meister A.D. A Report on the Use of a Travel Cost Demand Model for Recreation Analysis in New Zealand: An Evaluation of LakeTutira 1981, Massey University.
21. Hausman D.A., Ruud P. Specifying and testing econometric models for rank-ordered data. Journal of Econometrics 1987, 34:83-104.
22. Hensher D., Greene W. The mixed logit model: the state of practice. Transportation 2003, 30:133-176.
23. Hensher D.A., Rose J.M., Greene W.H. Applied Choice Analysis 2005, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
24. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979, 47(2):263-292.
25. Kerr G., Sharp B. Transfer Of Choice Model Benefits: A Case Study of Stream Mitigation, Occasional Paper No. 4 2003.
26. Kerr G., Swaffield S.R. Amenity Values of Spring Fed Streams and Rivers in Canterbury, New Zealand: A Methodological Exploration 2007, Agribusiness and Economics Research Unit.
27. Krueger R.A. Focus Groups. A Practical Guide for Applied Research 1994, Sage.
28. Longo A., Markandya A., Petrucci M. The internalization of externalities in the production of electricity: willingness to pay for the attributes of a policy for renewable energy. Ecological Economics 2008, 67:140-152.
29. Louviere J., Hensher D.A. Design and analysis of simulated choice or allocation experiments in travel choice modeling. Transportation Research Record 1982, 890:11-17.
30. Louviere J., Woodworth G. Design and analysis of simulated consumer choice or allocation experiments: an approach based on aggregate data. Journal of Marketing Research 1983, 20:350-367.
31. MacMillan D., Hanley N., Lienhoop N. Contingent valuation: environmental polling or preference engine?. Ecological Economics 2006, 60(1):299-307.
32. Marsh D., Baskaran R. Valuation of water quality improvements in the Karapiro catchment: a choice modelling approach. Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society 53rd Annual Conference, Cairns, Australia 2009.
33. McFadden D. Sociality, rationality, and the ecology of choice. Proceedings from the Inaugural International Choice Modelling Conference 2010, S. Hess, A. Daly (Eds.).
34. Morrison M. Aggregation biases in stated preference studies. Australian Economic Papers 2000, 39(2):215-230.
35. Morrison M., Bennett J., Blamey R., Louviere J. Choice modeling and tests of benefit transfer. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2002, 84:161-170.
36. Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment Growing for Good. Intensive Farming, Sustainability and New Zealand's Environment 2004, Wellington.
37. Peterson G., Brown T., DW M., Bell P., Birjulin A., Clarke A. Moral responsibility effects in valuation of WTA for public and private goods by the method of paired comparisons. Forestry, Economics and the Environment 1996, CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon. W. Adamowicz, P. Boxall, M. Luckert, W. Phillips, W. White (Eds.).
38. Pretty J.N., Mason C.F., Nedwell D.B., Hine R.E., Leaf S., Dils R. Environmental costs of freshwater eutrophication in England and Wales. Environmental Science & Technology 2003, 37:201-208.
39. Rose J.M., Scarpa R. Design efficiency for nonmarket valuation with choice modelling: how to measure it, what to report and why. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 2008, 52(3).
40. Scarpa R., Campbell D., Hutchinson W.G. Benefit estimates for landscape improvements: sequential Bayesian design and respondents' Rationality in a choice experiment. Land Economics 2007, 83:617-634.
41. Scarpa R., Gilbride T.J., Campbell D., Hensher D.A. Modelling attribute non-attendance in choice experiments for rural landscape valuation. European Review of Agricultural Economics 2009, 36(2).
42. Sharp B., Kerr G. Option and Existence Values for the Waitaki Catchment 2005, Report Prepared for Ministry for the Environment.
43. Thiene M., Scarpa R. Deriving and testing efficient estimates of WTP distributions in destination choice models. Environmental Resource Economics 2009, 44:379-395.
44. Train K. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation 2003, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
45. Train K.E. Recreation demand models with taste differences over people. Land Economics 1998, 74:230-239.
46. Viscusi W.K., Huber J., Bell J. The economic value of water quality. Journal Environmental and Resource Economics 2008, 41(2):169-187.
47. von Haefen R.H. Incorporating observed choice into the construction of welfare measures from random utility models. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2003, 45:145-165.