Flood hazards and masonry constructions: A probabilistic framework for damage, risk and resilience at urban scale

Natural Hazards and Earth System Science

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1799-1809

  Mebarki, A ^a   Valencia, N ^a   Salagnac, J L ^b   Barroca, B ^a  

^a Universite Paris Est   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS EST   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISASTER MANAGEMENT; FAILURE MECHANISM; FLOOD; GIS; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; MASONRY; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION;

EID: 84861824848     PISSN: 15618633     EISSN: 16849981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5194/nhess-12-1799-2012     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Aronica, G. T., Candela, A., Fabio, P., and Santoro, M.: Estimation of flood inundation probabilities using global hazard indexes based on hydrodynamic variables, Phys. Chem. Earth, in press, doi:10.1016/j.pce.2011.04.001, 2011.
2. Barroca, B., Bernardara, P., Mouchel, J. M., and Hubert, G.: Indicators for identification of urban flooding vulnerability, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 6, 553-561, doi:10.5194/nhess-6-553-2006, 2006.
3. Benedetti, D. and Petrini, V.: Sulla vulnerabilita sismica degli edifici in muratura: proposta di un metodo di valutazione, L'industria della costruzioni, 18, 66-74, 1984.
4. Borga, M., Anagnostou, E. N., Blöschl, G., and Creutin, J. D.: Flash flood forecasting, warning and risk management: the HYDRATE project, Environ. Sci. Policy, 14, 834-844, 2011.
5. de Vries, D. H.: Temporal vulnerability in hazardscapes: Flood memory-netwroks and referentiallity along the North Carolina Neuse River (USA), Glob. Environ. Change, 21, 154-164, 2011.
6. Fedeski, M. and Gwillian, J.: Urban sustainability in the presence of flood and geological hazards: The development of a GIS-based vulnerability and risk assessment methodology, Landscape Urban Plan., 83, 50-61, 2007. (Pubitemid 47577530)
7. Fernandez D. S. and Lutz, M. A.: Urban flood hazard zoning in Tu-cuman Province, Argentina, using GIS and multicriteria decision analysis, Eng. Geol., 111, 90-98, 2010.
8. Folke, C.: Website of Stockholm Resilience Centre, available at: http://www.stockholmresilience.org/, last access: November 2011.
9. HEC: Hec-ras 3.1, hydrologic engineering center-river analysis system, available at: http://www.hec.usace.army.mil/publications/pubdownload.html (last access: March 2012), 2012.
10. Jonkman, S. N., Bockarjova, M., Kok, M., and Bernardini, P.: Integrated hydrodynamic and economic modeling of flood damage in the Netherlands, Ecol. Econom., 66, 77-90, 2008.
11. Kazmierczak, A. and Cavan, G.: Surface water flooding risk to urban communities: analysis of vulnerability, hazard and exposure, Landscape Urban Plan., 103, 185-197, 2011.
12. Kelman, I.: Physical flood vulnerability of residential properties in coastal Eastern England, PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, UK, 2002.
13. Kelman, I. and Spence, R.: An overview of flood actions on buildings, Eng. Geol., 73, 297-309, 2004. (Pubitemid 38549712)
14. Linnekamp, F., Koedam, A., and Baud, I. S. A.: Household vulnerability to climate change: Examining perceptions of households of flood risks in Georgetown and Paramaribo, Habitat Int., Elsevier, 35, 447-456, 2011.
15. Marchi, L., Borga, M., Preciso, E., and Gaume, E.: Characterisation of selected extreme flash floods in Europe and implications for flood risk management, J. Hydrol., 394, 118-133, 2011.
16. Mebarki, A. and Valencia, N.: Vulnérabilité sismique des ouvrages en maçonnerie, Revue Française de Génie Civil, Ed. Hermès, 7, 471-498, 2003.
17. Mebarki, A. and Valencia, N.: Informal masonry structures: Seismic vulnerability and GIS maps, Masonry Int., British Masonry Society, 17, 18-25, 2004. (Pubitemid 38652870)
18. Mebarki, A., Genatios, C., and Lafuente, M.: Risques Naturels et Technologiques: Aléas, Vulnérabilité et Fiabilité des Constructions-vers une formulation probabiliste intégrée, Presses Ponts et Chaussées, ISBN 978-2-85978-436-2, Paris, 2008.
19. Mens, M. J. P., Klijn, F., de Bruijn, K. M., and van Beek, E.: The meaning of system robustness for flood risk management, Environ. Sci. Policy, 14, 1121-1131, 2011.
20. NFPC: Flood proofing performance, Tech. Rep., National Flood proofing committee, 1998.
21. Pappenberger, F., Beven, K., Frodsham, K., Romanowicz, R., and Matgen, P.: Grasping the unavoidable subjectivity in calibration of flood inundation models: A vulnerability weighted approach, J. Hydrol., 333, 275-287, 2007. (Pubitemid 46075123)
22. Paul, B. K.: Flood research in Bangladesh in retrospect and prospect: a review, Geoforum, 28, 121-131, 1997.
23. Penning-Rowsell, E. and Chatterton, J.: The Benefits of flood Alleviation: A manual of assessment techniques, Saxon House, Farn-borough, 1977.
24. Qi, H. and Altinakar, M. S.: A GIS-based decision support system for integrated flood management under uncertainty with two dimensional numerical simulations, Environ. Model. Softw., 26, 817-821, 2011.
25. Redeker, C.: Zollhafen, Mainz project developer's guide model project for flood adapted building, workshop report, 72 pp., 2010.
26. Ruin, I., Creutin, J. D., Anquetin, S., and Lutoff, C.: Human exposure to flash floods-relation between flood parameters and human vulnerability during a storm of September 2002 in Southern France, J. Hydrol., 361, 199-213, 2008.
27. Schelfaut, K., Pannemans, B., van der Craats, I., Krywkow, J., Mysiak, J., and Cools, J.: Bringing flood resilience into practice: the FREEMAN project, Environ. Sci. Policy, 14, 825-833, 2011.
28. Schumann, G., Matgen, P., Hoffmann, L., Hostache, R., Pappen-berger, F., and Pfister, L.: Deriving distributed roughness values from satellite radar data for flood inundation modelling, J. Hydrol., 344, 96-111, 2007. (Pubitemid 47371130)
29. Treby, E. J., Clark, M. J., and Priest, S. J.: Integrated hydrodynamic and economic modeling of flood damage in the Netherlands, J. Environ. Manage., 81, 351-359, 2006.
30. USACE: Flood proofing regulations, Tech. Rep., United States Army Corps of Engineers, 1995.
31. USACE: Yuba county damage survey following 1997 floods, post-flood assessment, Tech. Rep., United States Army Corps of Engineers, 1997
32. USACE: Economic guidance memorandum (egm) 01-03, generic depth-damage relationships. Tech. Rep., United States Army Corps of Engineers, 2000.
33. Valencia, N.: Risques naturels, aléa, vulnérabilité mécanique: cas de constructions en maçonnerie vis-à-vis des séismes et inon-dations, Ph.D. thesis Université Paris Marne-la-Vallée, 184 pp., France.
34. Valencia, N., Mebarki, A., and Salagnac, J. L.: Reliability and vulnerability of masonry constructions: case of flood hazards, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., submitted, 2011.
35. van Herk, S., Zevenbergen, C., Ashley, R., and Rijke, J.: Learning and Action Alliances for the integration of flood risk management into urban planning: a new framework from empirical evidence from The Netherlands, Environ. Sci. Policy, 14, 543-554, 2011.
36. van Ree, C. C. D. F., Van, M. A., Heilemann, K., Morris, M. W., Royet, P., and Zevenbergen, C.: FloodProBE: technologies for improved safety of the built environment in relation to flood events, Environ. Sci. Policy, 14, 874-883, 2011.
37. Versini, P. A.: Use of radar rainfall estimates and forecasts to prevent flash flood in real time by using a road inundation warning system, J. Hydrol., 416-417, 157-170, 2012.
38. Vinet, F.: Geographical analysis of damage due to flash floods in southern France: The cases of 12-13 November 1999 and 8-9 September 2002, Appl. Geogr., 28, 323-336, 2008.