Knowledge of performance is insufficient for implicit visuomotor rotation adaptation

Journal of Motor Behavior

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 185-194

  Peled, Assaf ^a   Karniel, Amir ^a  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

Author keywords

knowledge of performance; motor learning; reaching movements; visual feedback; visuomotor rotation adaptation

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADULT; ARTICLE; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REINFORCEMENT; ROTATION; SENSORY FEEDBACK; VISION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADULT; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE OF RESULTS (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MOVEMENT; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; ROTATION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84861820536     PISSN: 00222895     EISSN: 19401027     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2012.672349     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Baraduc, P., & Wolpert, D. M. (2002). Adaptation to a visuomotor shift depends on the starting posture. Journal of Neurophysiology, 88, 973-981.
2. Bernier, P. M., Chua, R., & Franks, I. M. (2005). Is proprioception calibrated during visually guidedmovements? Experimental, Brain Research, 167, 292-296.
3. Donchin, O., Francis, J. T., & Shadmehr, R. (2003). Quantifying generalization from trial-by-trial behavior of adaptive systems that learn with basis functions: Theory and experiments in human motor control. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 9032-9045.
4. Fine, S.M., & Thoroughman, A. K. (2006).Motor adaptation to single force pulses: Sensitive to direction but insensitive to withinmovement pulse placement and magnitude. Journal of Neurophysiology, 96, 710-720.
5. Heuer, H., & Hegele, M. (2007). Constraints on visuo-motor adaptation depends on the type of visual feedback during practice. Experimental, Brain Research, 185, 101-110.
6. Hinder, M. R., Riek, S., Tresilian, J. R., Rugy, A., & Carson, R. G. (2010). Real-time error detection but not error correction drives automatic visuomotor adaptation. Experimental, Brain Research, 201, 191-207.
7. Karniel, A. (2009). Computational motor control. In M. D. Binder, N. Hirokawa, & U. Windhorst (Eds.), Encyclopedia of neuroscience (pp. 832-837). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
8. Karniel, A. (2011). Open questions in computational motor control. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 10, 385-411.
9. Kawato,M. (1999). Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 9, 718-727.
10. Kitazawa, S., Kohno, T., & Uka, T. (1995). Effects of delayed visual information on the rate and amount of prism adaptation in the human. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 7644-7652.
11. Krakauer, J.W., Ghilardi, M. F.,Mentis,M., Barnes, A., Milana, V., Eidelberg, D., & Ghez, C. (2004). Differential cortical and subcortical activations in learning rotations and gains for reaching: A PET study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 91, 924-933.
12. Krakauer, J. W., Pine, Z. M., Ghilardi, M. F., & Ghez, C. (2000). Learning of visuomotor transformations for vectorial planning of reaching trajectories. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 8916-8924.
13. Mazzoni, P., & Krakauer, J. W. (2006). An implicit plan overrides an explicit strategy during visuomotor adaptation. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 3642-3645.
14. Peled, A., Baraduc, P., & Karniel, A. (2010, April). Adaptation and lack of adaptation to rotated visual feedback during reaching movement and target jump. Paper presented at the 20th Annual Meeting of the Society for Neural Control of Movement (NCM), Naples, Florida.
15. Peled, A., & Karniel, A. (2010, June). Lack of adaptation to rotated visual feedback when only knowledge of results is provided. Paper presented at the Sixth Computational Motor Control Workshop, Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
16. Pine, Z. M., Krakauer, J. W., Gordon, J., & Ghez, C. (1996). Comparison of scaling factors and reference axes for reaching movements. Neuroreport, 7, 2357-2361.
17. Scheidt, R. A., & Ghez, C. (2007). Separate adaptive mechanisms for controlling trajectory and final position in reaching. Journal of Neurophysiology, 98, 3600-3613.
18. Shabbott, B. A., & Sainburg, R. L. (2010). Learning a visuomotor rotation: Simultaneous visual and proprioceptive information is crucial for visuomotor remapping. Experimental Brain Research, 203, 75-87.
19. Shadmehr, R., & Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. (1994). Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 3208-3224.
20. Shadmehr, R., & Wise, S. P. (2005). The Computational Neurobiology of Reaching and Pointing: A Foundation for Motor Learning, Published by MIT Press, pp. 50, 67-68, 336, 379-381.
21. Taylor, J. A., & Ivry, R. B. (2011). Flexible cognitive strategies during motor learning. PLoS Computational Biology, 7(3), e1001096.
22. Thoroughman, K. A., & Shadmehr, R. (2000). Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives. Nature, 407, 742-747.
23. Tseng, Y. W., Diedrichsen, J., Krakauer, J. W., Shadmehr, R., & Bastian, A. J. (2007). Sensory prediction error drive cerebellumdependent adaptation of reaching, Journal of Neurophysiology, 98, 54-62.
24. Wagner, M. J., & Smith, M. (2008). Shared internal models for feedforward and feedback control. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 10663-10673.
25. Wang, J., & Sainburg, R. L. (2005). Adaptation to visuomotor rotation remaps movement vectors, not final positions. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 4024-4030.