Fragmentation and connection of frames in collaborative water governance: A case study of river catchment management in Southern Ecuador

International Review of Administrative Sciences

Volumn 77, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 50-75

  Dewulf, Art ^a   Mancero, Monica ^b   Cárdenas, German ^c   Sucozhañay, Dolores ^c  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b FLACSO ECUADOR   (Ecuador)

^c UNIVERSIDAD DE CUENCA   (Ecuador)

Author keywords

decision making; multi level government; networks; partnerships

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION; RIVER MANAGEMENT; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER RESOURCE;

ECUADOR; PAUTE BASIN;

EID: 79953180538     PISSN: 00208523     EISSN: 14617226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0020852310390108     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Agranoff R. and McGuire M. (2001) Big questions in public network management research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 11(3): 295-326.
2. Alvesson M. and Kärreman D. (2000) Taking the linguistic turn in organizational research: Challenges, responses, consequences. Journal of Applied Behavioural Sciences 36: 136-158.
3. Ansell C. and Gash A. (2008) Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18(4): 543-571.
4. Argyris C. (1999) On Organizational Learning (2nd edn). London: Blackwell.
5. Barzelay M., Gaetani F., Velarde J. and Cejudo G. (2003) Research on public management policy change in the Latin America region: A conceptual framework and methodological guide. International Public Management Review 4(1): 20-41.
6. Benson D. and Jordan A. (2010) The scaling of water governance tasks: A comparative federal analysis of the European Union and Australia. Environmental Management 46(1): 7-16.
7. Bentrup G. (2001) Evaluation of a collaborative model: A case study analysis of watershed planning in the Intermountain West. Environmental Management 27(5): 739-748.
8. Bruner J. (1979) Decision-making as discourse. In: Bell C (ed.) Uncertain Outcomes. Lancaster: MTP Press, 93-114.
9. Cash DW, Adger WN, Berkes F., Garden P., Lebel L., Olsson P., Pritchard L. and Young O. (2006) Scale and cross-scale dynamics: Governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecology and Society 11(2): 8-19.
10. Craps M., Dewulf A., Mancero M., Santos E. and Bouwen R. (2004) Constructing common ground and re-creating differences between professional and indigenous communities in the Andes. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 14(5): 378-393.
11. Dewulf A., Craps M. and Dercon G. (2004) How issues get framed and reframed when different communities meet: A multi-level analysis of a collaborative soil conservation initiative in the Ecuadorian Andes. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 14: 177-192.
12. Dewulf A., Craps M., Bouwen R., Taillieu T. and Pahl-Wostl C. (2005) Integrated management of natural resources: Dealing with ambiguous issues, multiple actors and diverging frames. Water Science & Technology 52(6): 115-124.
13. Dewulf A., Mancero M., Cárdenas G. and Sucozhañay D. (2006) Hoe actoren complexe situaties kaderen en herkaderen: een gevalstudie het beheer van het Paute-rivierbekken [How actor frame and reframe complex situations: A case study of the management of the Paute river catchment]. In: Hovelynck J, de Weerdt S and Dewulf A (eds) Relationeel organiseren. Samen leren en werken in en tussen organisaties. [Relational Organizing: Learning and Working Together, in and between Organizations]. Leuven, Belgium: Lannoo campus.
14. Dewulf A., Gray B., Putnam L., Lewicki R., Aarts N., Bouwen R and van Woerkum C (2009) Disentangling approaches to framing in conflict and negotiation research: A meta-paradigmatic perspective. Human Relations 62(2): 155-193.
15. Drake LE and Donohue WA (1996) Communicative framing theory in conflict resolution. Communication Research 23(3): 297-322.
16. Eden C. and Huxham C. (1996) Action research for the study of organizations. In: Clegg S, Hardy C and Nord W (eds) Handbook of Organizational Studies. London: Sage, 526-542.
17. Entman RM (1993) Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 43(4): 51-58.
18. Fals Borda O. (1987) The application of participatory action research in Latin America. International Sociology 2(4): 329-347.
19. Flyvbjerg B. (2006) Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry 12(2): 219-245.
20. Gray B. (1989) Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
21. Hardy C., Lawrence T. and Grant D. (2005) Discourse and collaboration: The role of conversations and collective identity. Academy of Management Review 30(1): 58-77.
22. Huitema D., Mostert E., Egas W., Moellenkamp S., Pahl-Wostl C. and Yalcin R. (2009) Adaptive water governance: Assessing the institutional prescriptions of adaptive (co-) management from a governance perspective and defining a research agenda. Ecology and Society 14(1): 26.
23. Huxham C. (2000) The challenge of collaborative governance. Public Management 2(3): 337-357.
24. Huxham C. and Vangen S. (2005) Managing to Collaborate. London: Routledge.
25. Imperial MT (2005) Using collaboration as a governance strategy: Lessons from six watershed management programs. Administration and Society 37(3): 281-320.
26. Kickert WJM, Klijn EH and Koppenjan JFM (1997) Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector. London: Sage.
27. Koppenjan J. and Klijn EH (2004) Managing Uncertainties in Networks: A Network Approach to Problem Solving and Decision Making. London: Routledge.
28. Kurtz HE (2003) Scale frames and counter-scale frames: Constructing the problem of environmental injustice. Political Geography 22(8): 887-916.
29. Lejano RP and Ingram H. (2009) Collaborative networks and new ways of knowing. Environmental Science & Policy 12(6): 653-662.
30. Lewicki R., Gray B. and Elliott M. (2003) Making Sense of Intractable Environmental Conflict: Concepts and Cases. Washington, DC: Island Press.
31. Lopez-Gunn E. (2003) The role of collective action in water governance: A comparative study of groundwater user associations in La Mancha aquifers in Spain. Water International 28(3): 367-378.
32. Mandell M. (2001) Getting Results through Collaboration: Networks and Network Structures for Public Policy and Management. Westport, CT: Praeger.
33. Mitroff I. (1983) Stakeholders of the Organizational Mind: Toward a New View of Organizational Policy Making. London: Jossey-Bass.
34. Nisbet MC and Mooney C. (2007) Framing science. Science 316(5821): 56.
35. Pahl-Wostl C., Craps M., Dewulf A., Mostert E., Tabara D. and Taillieu T. (2007) Social learning and water resources management. Ecology and Society 12(2): 5. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art5/.
36. Schön DA and Rein M. (1994) Frame Reflection: Toward a Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: Basic Books.
37. Singh A., Singai CB, Srivastava S. and Sivam S. (2009) Inclusive water governance: A global necessity. Lessons from India. Transition Studies Review 16(2): 598-608.
38. Termeer CJAM (2009) Barriers to new modes of horizontal governance. Public Management Review 11(3): 299-316.
39. Trist E. (1983) Referent organizations and the development of inter-organizational domains. Human Relations 36(3): 269-284.
40. van Buuren A. (2009) Knowledge for governance, governance of knowledge: Inclusive knowledge management in collaborative governance processes. International Public Management Journal 12(2): 208-235.
41. Weick K. (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42. Wood L. and Kroger R. (2000) Doing Discourse Analysis: Methods for Studying Action in Talk and Text. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.