Towards an integrated crowdsourcing definition

Journal of Information Science

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 189-200

  Estellés Arolas, Enrique ^a   González Ladrón De Guevara, Fernando ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

crowdsourcing; definition; innovation

Indexed keywords

CO-CREATION; COLLABORATIVE ACTIVITIES; CROWDSOURCING; DEFINITION; INTERNET BASED; USER INNOVATION;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INNOVATION;

INFORMATION SCIENCE;

EID: 84861792082     PISSN: 01655515     EISSN: 17416485     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0165551512437638     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Howe J Crowdsourcing: how the power of the crowd is driving the future of business. UK: Business Books ; 2008 :
2. Vukovic M, Bartolini C Leveraging applications of formal methods, verification, and validation. Tiziana M Bernhard S, ed. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer ; 2010: 425-434.
3. SchenkEGuittardC. Crowdsourcing: what can be outsourced to the crowd, and why?Technical Report. Available at: http://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs- 00439256/ (2009, accessed 1 September 2011).
4. Brabham DC. Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving: an introduction and cases. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. 2008 ; 14 (1). 75-90
5. Brabham DC The Routledge handbook of participatory culture. Delwiche A Henderson J, ed.
6. Vukovic M Proceedings of the 2009 congress on services-I. Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society ; 2009: 686-692.
7. Geiger D, Seedorf S, Schader M. Managing the crowd: towards a taxonomy of crowdsourcing processes. ; Detroit, Michigan ;..
8. Doan A, Ramakrishnan R, Halevy AY. Crowdsourcing systems on the World-Wide Web. Communications of the ACM. 2011 ; 54 (4). 86-96
9. Brabham DC. Moving the crowd at iStockphoto: the composition of the crowd and motivations for participation in a crowdsourcing application. First Monday. 2008 ; 13 ( 6 ):
10. Burger-Helmchen T, Penin J. The limits of crowdsourcing inventive activities: what do transaction cost theory and the evolutionary theories of the firm teach us?. Workshop on Open Source innovation ; 2010 Strasbourg, France ; 2010..
11. Buecheler T, Sieg JH, Füchslin RM, Pfeifer R. Crowdsourcing, open innovation and collective intelligence in the scientific method: a research agenda and operational framework. Artificial life XII. Proceedings of the twelfth international conference on the synthesis and simulation of living systems ; Odense, Denmark ;. 679.
12. Huberman BA, Romero DM, Wu F. Crowdsourcing, attention and productivity. Journal of Information Science. 2009 ; 35 (6). 758-765
13. Kleeman F, Voss GG, Rieder K. Un(der)paid innovators: the commercial utilization of consumer work through crowdsourcing. Science, Technology and Innovation Studies. 2008 ; 4 (1). 5-26
14. Andriole SJ. Business impact of Web 2.0 technologies. Communications of the ACM. 2010 ; 53 (12). 67-79
15. Howe J. The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired. 2006 ; 14 ( 6 ):
16. Denyer D, Tranfield D, Van Aken JE. Developing design propositions through research synthesis. Organization Studies. 2008 ; 29 (3). 393
17. Delgado M Revisión sistemática de estudios: Metaanálisis. Barcelona: Signo ; 2010 :
18. Petitti DB Meta-analysis, decision analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis. New York: Oxford University Press ; 2000 :
19. Egger M, Smith GD, Altman D Systematic reviews in health care. Meta-analysis in context. London: BMJ Books ; 2001 :
20. Tatarkiewicz W History of six ideas: an essay in aesthetics. Berlin: Springer ; 1980 :
21. Cosma G, Joy M. Towards a definition of source-code plagiarism. IEEE Transactions on Education. 2008 ; 51 (2). 195-200 (Pubitemid 351761547)
22. Aliakbarian S, Rahimabadi AM, Sadeghi PH, Mirsatari NS. Neighbor definition in P2P networks. Proceedings of 2006 international conference on communications, circuits and systems ; 2007 Guilin ; 2007. 1562.
23. Brabham DC. Crowdsourcing the public participation process for planning projects. Planning Theory. 2009 ; 8 (3). 242-262
24. Wikipedia. 'Crowdsourcing'. Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Crowdsourcing (2011, accessed 15 August 2011).
25. Alonso O, Lease M Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, WSDM '11. New York: ACM ; 2011: 1-2.
26. Bederson BB, Quinn AJ. Web workers unite! Addressing challenges of online laborers. Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference extended abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '11 ; 2011 Vancouver ; 2011. 97.
27. Chanal V, Caron-Fasan ML EURAM. Slovenia: Lubjana ; 2008 :
28. DiPalantino D, Vojnovic M. Crowdsourcing and all-pay auctions. Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on electronic commerce, EC '09 ; ;. 2009 119.
29. Grier DA. Not for all markets. Computer. 2011 ; 44 (5). 6-8
30. Heer J, Bostock M. Crowdsourcing graphical perception: using mechanical turk to assess visualization design. Proceedings of the 28th international conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI'10 ; 2010 ACM, New York ; 2010. 203.
31. Heymann P, Garcia-Molina H Proceedings of the 20th international conference on world wide web, WWW '11. New York: ACM ; 2011: 477-486.
32. HoweJ. Crowdsourcing: a definition. Crowdsourcing: why the power of the crowd is driving the future of business. Weblog, 2June. Available at: http://crowdsourcing.typepad.com/cs/2006/06/crowdsourcing-a.html (2006, accessed 27 July 2011).
33. Kazai G Proceedings of the 33rd European conference on advances in information retrieval. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag ; 2011: 165-176.
34. La Vecchia G, Cisternino A Proceedings of first enterprise crowdsourcing workshop in conjunction with ICWE 2010. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag ; 2010: 425-430.
35. Ling P. An empirical study of social capital in participation in online crowdsourcing. Computer. 2010 ; 7 (9). 1-4
36. Liu E, Porter T. Culture and KM in China. VINE. 2010 ; 40 (3/4). 326-333
37. Mazzola D, Distefano A. Crowdsourcing and the participation process for problem solving: the case of BP. VII conference of the Italian chapter of AIS information technology and innovation trend in organization, itAIS 2007 ; 2010 Naples, Italy ; 2010..
38. Oliveira F, Ramos I, Santos L Current trends in web engineering. Daniel F., ed. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer ; 2010: 412-416.
39. PoetzMKSchreierM. The value of crowdsourcing: can users really compete with professionals in generating new product ideas?Journal of Product Innovation ManagementForthcoming. Available at: SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1566903.
40. Porta M, House B, Buckley L, Blitz A. Value 2.0: eight new rules for creating and capturing value from innovative technologies. Strategy & Leadership. 2008 ; 36 (4). 10-18
41. Reichwald R, Piller F Interaktive Wertschöpfung. Open Innovation, Individualisierung und neue Formen der Arbeitsteilung. Wiesbaden: Gabler ; 2006 :
42. Ribiere VM, Tuggle FD. Fostering innovation with KM 2.0. VINE. 2010 ; 40 ( 1 ):
43. Sloane P. The brave new world of open innovation. Strategic Direction. 2011 ; 27 (5). 3-4
44. Vukovic M, Mariana L, Laredo J Service-oriented computing. Asit D, ed. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag ; 2009 :
45. Wexler MN. Reconfiguring the sociology of the crowd: exploring crowdsourcing. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy. 2011 ; 31 (1). 6-20
46. Whitla P. Crowdsourcing and its application in marketing. Contemporary Management Research. 2009 ; 5 (1). 15-28
47. Yang J, Adamic LA, Ackerman MS Proceedings of the 9th ACM conference on electronic commerce. New York: ACM ; 2008: 246-255.
48. Geerts S Discovering crowdsourcing: theory, classification and directions for use. Technishce Universiteit Eindhoven ; 2009 :
49. SiddiqueH. Mob rule: Iceland crowdsources its next constitution. The Guardian. Available at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jun/09/iceland- crowdsourcing-constitution-facebook (accessed 1 December 2011).
50. Inc. Using crowdsourcing to control inventory. Available at: http://www.inc.com/magazine/20100201/using-crowdsourcing-to-control-inventory. html. (2010, accessed 18 August 2011).
51. Brabham DC. Moving the crowd at Threadless. Information, Communication & Society. 2010 ; 13 (8). 1122-1145
52. Surowiecki J The wisdom of crowds. New York: Anchor Books ; 2005 :
53. Giudice KD. Crowdsourcing credibility: the impact of audience feedback on web page credibility. Proceedings of the 73rd ASIS&T annual meeting on navigating streams in an information ecosystem, ASIS&T '10 ; 2010 ; 2010. 1.
54. Superbowl. Crash the SuperBowl. Available at: http://www. crashthesuperbowl.com/ (accessed 18 August 2011).
55. Stewart O, Huerta JM, Sader M Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD Workshop on Human Computation, HCOMP '09. New York: ACM ; 2009: 50-53.
56. LakhaniKRJeppesenLBLohsePAPanettaJA. The value of openness in scientific problem solving. Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 07-050.
57. Maslow AH. A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review. 1943 ; 50: 370-396
58. Veal AJ Leisure and tourism policy and planning. Oxford, UK: CABI Publishing ; 2002 :
59. FBI. Cryptanalysts: Help Break the Code. Available at: http://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2011/march/cryptanalysis-032111 (2011, accessed 15 July 2011).
60. ECMT (European Commission for Mobility and Transport). Door-to-Door in a click. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/transport/its/multimodal-planners/ index-en.htm (2011, accessed 15 July 2011).
61. Dahlander L, Gann DM. How open is innovation?. Research Policy. 2010 ; 39 (6). 699-709
62. Heizer J, Render B Operations Management. 9 th ed.Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2008. Pearson/Prentice Hall ; 2008 :
63. OSI. The Open Source Definition. Available at: http://opensource.org/ docs/osd (accessed 25 November 2011).