Assessment and Management of Pain in Dairy Cows with Clinical Mastitis

Veterinary Clinics of North America - Food Animal Practice

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 289-305

  Leslie, Kenneth E ^a   Petersson Wolfe, Christina S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^b VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment of pain; Management of pain; Mastitis; Non steroidal anti inflammatory agents; Perception of pain; Treatment

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT; NONSTEROID ANTIINFLAMMATORY AGENT;

ANALGESIA; ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL DISEASE; BOVINE MASTITIS; CATTLE; FEMALE; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANALGESICS; ANIMALS; ANTI-INFLAMMATORY AGENTS, NON-STEROIDAL; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CATTLE; FEMALE; MASTITIS, BOVINE; PAIN MANAGEMENT; PAIN MEASUREMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BOS;

EID: 84861789330     PISSN: 07490720     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2012.04.002     Document Type: Review

References (80)

1. Olde Riekerink R.G.M., Barkema H.W., Kelton D.F., et al. Incidence rate of clinical mastitis on Canadian dairy farms. J Dairy Sci 2008, 91:1366-1377.
2. Bradley A.J. Bovine mastitis: an evolving disease. Vet J 2002, 164:116-128.
3. Fetrow J., Stewart S., Eicker S., et al. Mastitis: an economic consideration. National Mastitis Council Annual Meeting Proceedings 2000, 3-47. National Mastitis Council, Atlanta (GA).
4. Blowey R., Edmondson P. Mastitis control in dairy herds 2010, CAB International, Oxfordshire (UK). 2nd ed.
5. Milne M.H. Mastitis is a welfare problem. Proceedings of the British Mastitis Conference, Institute for Animal Health 2005, 15-19. Stoneleigh, Coventry, West Midlands (UK).
6. Barker A.R., Schrick F.N., Lewis M.J., et al. Influence of clinical mastitis during early lactation on reproductive performance of Jersey cows. J Dairy Sci 1998, 81:1285-1290.
7. Schrick F.N., Hockett M.E., Saxton A.M., et al. Influence of subclinical mastitis during early lactation on reproductive parameters. J Dairy Sci 2001, 84:1407-1412.
8. Leslie K.E., Kielland C., Millman S.T. Is mastitis painful and is therapy for pain beneficial?. National Mastitis Council Annual Meeting Proceedings 2010, 114-130. National Mastitis Council, Albuquerque (NM).
9. Hillerton J.E. Mastitis therapy is necessary for animal welfare. Bulletin of the International Dairy Federation (IDF) 1998, 4-5. IDF, Brussels (Belgium).
10. Pain terms. International Association for the Study of Pain International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP), Accessed September 27, 2011. http://www.iasp-pain.org/Content/NavigationMenu/GeneralResourceLinks/PainDefinitions/default.htm#Pain.
11. Fitzpatrick J.L., Young F.J., Eckersall P.D., et al. Recognising and controlling pain and inflammation in mastitis. Proceedings of the British Mastitis Conference, Institute for Animal Health 1998, 36-44. Stoneleigh, Coventry, West Midlands (UK).
12. Huxley J.N., Hudson C. Should we control the pain of mastitis?. Int Dairy Topics 2007, 6:17-19.
13. Dobromylskyj P., Flecknell B.D., Lascelles B.D., et al. Pain assessment. Pain management in animals 2000, 53-79. Elsevier, Philadelphia. B.D. Flecknell, A.E. Waterman-Pearson (Eds.).
14. Huzzey J.M., Veira D.M., Weary D.M., et al. Prepartum behavior and dry matter intake identify dairy cows at risk for metritis. J Dairy Sci 2007, 90:3220-3233.
15. Kielland C., Skjerve E., Østerås O., et al. Dairy farmer attitudes and empathy toward animals are associated with animal welfare indicators. J Dairy Sci 2010, 93:2998-3006.
16. Fitzpatrick J.L., Nolan A.M., Scott E.M., et al. Observers perception of pain in cattle. Cattle Pract 2002, 10:209-212.
17. Huxley J.N., Whay H.R. Current attitudes of cattle practitioners to pain and the use of analgesics in cattle. Vet Rec 2006, 159:662-668.
18. Anderson D.E., Muir W.W. Pain management in cattle. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 2005, 21:623-635.
19. Thomsen P.T., Gidekull M., Herskin M.S., et al. Scandinavian bovine practitioners' attitudes to the use of analgesics in cattle. Vet Rec 2010, 167:256-258.
20. Fraser D., Weary D.M., Pajor E.A., et al. A scientific conception of animal welfare that reflects ethical concerns. Anim Welfare 1997, 6:187-205.
21. von Keyserlingk M.A.G., Rushen J., de Passillé A.M., et al. Invited review: the welfare of dairy cattle-key concepts and the role of science. J Dairy Sci 2009, 92:4101-4111.
22. Five freedoms. Farm Animal Welfare Council Farm Animal Welfare Council (FAWC), Accessed July 15, 2010. http://www.fawc.org.uk/freedoms.htm.
23. Millman S.T. Sickness behaviour and its relevance to animal welfare assessment at the group level. Anim Welfare 2007, 16:123-125.
24. Hart B.L. Biological basis of the behavior of sick animals. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 1988, 12:123-137.
25. Aubert A. Sickness and behaviour in animals: a motivational perspective. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 1999, 23:1029-1036.
26. Wenz J.R., Barrington G.M., Garry F.B., et al. Use of systemic disease signs to assess disease severity in dairy cows with acute coliform mastitis. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001, 218:567-572.
27. Wenz J.R., Garry F.B., Barrington G.M. Comparison of disease severity scoring systems for dairy cattle with acute coliform mastitis. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2006, 229:259-262.
28. Fitzpatrick J.L., Nolan A.M., Young F.J., et al. Objective measurement of pain and inflammation in dairy cows with clinical mastitis. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics 2000, 73.
29. Milne M.H., Nolan A.M., Cripps P.J., et al. Preliminary results of a study on pain assessment in clinical mastitis in dairy cows. Proceedings of the British Mastitis Conference, Stoneleigh, Lancashire 2003, 117-119.
30. Zimov J.L., Botheras N.A., Weiss W.P., et al. Associations among behavioural and acute physiologic responses to lipopolysaccharide-induced clinical mastitis in lactating dairy cows. Am J Vet Res 2011, 72:620-627.
31. Muir W.W., Woolf C.J. Mechanisms of pain and their therapeutic implications. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001, 219:1346-1356.
32. Watkins L.R., Maier S.F. Immune regulation of central nervous system functions: from sickness responses to pathological pain. J Intern Med 2005, 257:139-155.
33. Rutherford K.M.D. Assessing pain in animals. Anim Welfare 2002, 11:31-53.
34. Weary D.M., Niel L., Flower F.C., et al. Identifying and preventing pain in animals. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2006, 100:64-76.
35. Harmon R.J. Somatic cell counts: a primer. National Mastitis Council Annual Meeting Proceedings 2001, 3-9. National Mastitis Council, Atlanta (GA).
36. Chagunda M.G.G., Friggens N.C., Rasmussen M.D., et al. A model for detection of individual cow mastitis based on an indicator measured in milk. J Dairy Sci 2006, 89:2980-2998.
37. Hogeveen H., Kamphuis C., Steeneveld W., et al. Sensors and milk quality the quest for the perfect alert. Proceedings of the The First North American Conference on Precision Dairy Management 2010, 138-151. Omnipress, Madison (WI).
38. Grönlund U., Sandgren C.H., Waller K.P. Haptoglobin and serum amyloid A in milk from dairy cows with chronic sub-clinical mastitis. Vet Res 2005, 36:191-198.
39. Anil L., Anil S.S., Deen J. Pain detection and amelioration in animals on the farm: issues and options. JAAWS 2005, 8:261-278.
40. Molony V., Kent J.E. Assessment of acute pain in farm animals using behavioral and physiological measurements. J Anim Sci 1997, 75:266-272.
41. Ledgerwood D.N., Winckler C., Tucker C.B. Evaluation of data loggers, sampling intervals, and editing techniques for measuring the lying behavior of dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 2010, 93:5129-5139.
42. Mazrier H., Tal S., Aizinbud E., et al. A field investigation of the use of the pedometer for the early detection of lameness in cattle. Can Vet J 2006, 47:883-886.
43. Kiddy C.A. Variation in physical activity as an indication of estrus in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 1977, 60:235-243.
44. Huzzey J.M., von Keyserlingk M.A.G., Weary D.M. Changes in feeding, drinking, and standing behavior of dairy cows during the transition period. J Dairy Sci 2005, 88:2454-2461.
45. von Keyserlingk M.A.G., Weary D.M. Maternal behavior in cattle. Horm Behav 2007, 52:106-113.
46. Cyples J.A., Fitzpatrick C.E., Leslie K.E., et al. Short communication: the effects of experimentally-induced E. coli clinical mastitis on lying behavior of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2012, 95:2571-2575.
47. Chapinal N., de Passillé A.M., Rushen J., et al. Short communication: measures of weight distribution and frequency of steps as indicators of restless behavior. J Dairy Sci 2011, 94:800-803.
48. Pastell M., Hänninen L., de Passillé A.M., et al. Measures of weight distribution of dairy cows to detect lameness and the presence of hoof lesions. J Dairy Sci 2010, 93:954-960.
49. Heinrich A., Duffield T.F., Lissemore K.D., et al. The effect of meloxicam on behavior and pain sensitivity of dairy calves following cautery dehorning with a local anesthetic. J Dairy Sci 2010, 93:2450-2457.
50. Dyer R.M., Neerchal N.K., Tasch U., et al. Objective determination of claw pain and its relationship to limb locomotion score in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 2007, 90:4592-4602.
51. Veissier I., Rushen J., Colwell D., et al. A laser-based method for measuring thermal nociception of cattle. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2000, 66:289-304.
52. Herskin M.S., Müller R., Schrader L., et al. A laser-based method to measure thermal nociception in dairy cows: short-term repeatability and effects of power output and skin condition. J Anim Sci 2003, 81:945-954.
53. Siivonen J., Taponen S., Hovinen M., et al. Impact of acute clinical mastitis on cow behaviour. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2011, 132:101-106.
54. Borderas T.F., de Passillé A.M., Rushen J. Behavior of dairy calves after a low dose of bacterial endotoxin. J Anim Sci 2008, 86:2920-2927.
55. Bristow D.J., Holmes D.S. Cortisol levels and anxiety-related behaviors in cattle. Physiol Behav 2007, 90:626-628.
56. Schirmann K., von Keyserlingk M.A.G., Weary D.M., et al. Technical note: validation of a system for monitoring rumination in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2009, 92:6052-6055.
57. Wagner A.E., Hellyer P.W. Survey of anesthesia techniques and concerns in private veterinary practice. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2000, 217:1652-1657.
58. Hewson C.J., Dohoo I.R., Lemke K.A., et al. Canadian veterinarians' use of analgesics in cattle, pigs, and horses in 2004 and 2005. Can Vet J 2007, 48:155-164.
59. Todd C.G., Millman S.T., McKnight D.R., et al. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy for neonatal calf diarrhea complex: effects on calf performance. J Anim Sci 2010, 88:2019-2028.
60. Roussel A.J., Sriranganathan N., Brown S.A., et al. Effect of flunixin meglumine on Escherichia coli heat-stable enterotoxin-induced diarrhea in calves. Am J Vet Res 1988, 49:1431-1433.
61. Barnett S.C., Sischo W.M., Moore D.A., et al. Evaluation of flunixin meglumine as an adjunct treatment for diarrhea in dairy calves. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003, 223:1329-1333.
62. Bednarek D., Zdzisińska B., Kondrackid M., et al. Effect of steroidal and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in combination with long-acting oxytetracycline on non-specific immunity of calves suffering from enzootic bronchopneumonia. Vet Microbiol 2003, 96:53-67.
63. Whay H.R., Webster A.J.F., Waterman-Pearson A.E. Role of ketoprofen in the modulation of hyperalgesia associated with lameness in dairy cattle. Vet Rec 2005, 157:729-733.
64. Barrett D.C. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in cattle: should we use them more?. Cattle Pract 2004, 12:69-73.
65. Anderson K.L., Smith A.R., Shanks R.D., et al. Efficacy of flunixin meglumine for the treatment of endotoxin-induced bovine mastitis. Am J Vet Res 1986, 47:1366-1372.
66. Wagner S.A., Apley M.D. Effects of two anti-inflammatory drugs on physiologic variables and milk production in cows with endotoxin-induced mastitis. Am J Vet Res 2004, 65:64-68.
67. Banting A., Banting S., Heinonen K., et al. Efficacy of oral and parenteral ketoprofen in lactating cows with endotoxin-induced acute mastitis. Vet Rec 2008, 163:506-509.
68. Lohuis J.A.C.M., Van Leeuwen W., Verheijden J.H.M., et al. Effect of steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on Escherichia coli endotoxin-induced mastitis in the cow. J Dairy Sci 1989, 72:241-249.
69. Vangroenweghe F., Duchateau L., Boutet P., et al. Effect of carprofen treatment following experimentally induced Escherichia coli mastitis in primiparous cows. J Dairy Sci 2005, 88:2361-2376.
70. Odensvik K., Magnusson U. Effect of oral administration of flunixin meglumine on the inflammatory response to endotoxin in heifers. Am J Vet Res 1996, 57:201-204.
71. Morkoç A.C., Hurley W.L., Whitmore H.L., et al. Bovine acute mastitis: effects of intravenous sodium salicylate on endotoxin-induced intramammary inflammation. J Dairy Sci 1993, 76:2579-2588.
72. Yeiser E.E., Leslie K.E., McGilliard M.L., et al. The effects of experimentally induced Escherichia coli mastitis and flunixin meglumine administration on activity measures, feed intake, and milk parameters. J Dairy Sci 2012, in press.
73. Van Oostveldt K., Tomita G.M., Paape M.J., et al. Apoptosis of bovine neutrophils during mastitis experimentally induced with Escherichia coli or endotoxin. Am J Vet Res 2002, 63:448-453.
74. Dascanio J.J., Mechor G.D., Gröhn Y.T., et al. Effect of phenylbutazone and flunixin meglumine on acute toxic mastitis in dairy cows. Am J Vet Res 1995, 56:1213-1218.
75. Fitzpatrick J.L., Young F.J., Eckersall P.D., et al. Mastitis: a painful problem?. Cattle Pract 1999, 7:225-226.
76. Shpigel N.Y., Chen R., Winkler M., et al. Anti-inflammatory ketoprofen in the treatment of field cases of bovine mastitis. Res Vet Sci 1994, 56:62-68.
77. Milne M.H., Nolan A.M., Cripps P.J., et al. Preliminary results on the effects of meloxicam (Metacam) on hypersensitivity in dairy cows with clinical mastitis. Proceedings of the World Buiatrics Congress 2004.
78. Banting A., Schmidt H., Banting S. Efficacy of meloxicam in lactating cows with E.coli endotoxin-induced acute mastitis. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2003, 23(Suppl 1).
79. Canadian quality milk on-farm food safety program: reference manual 2010, Dairy Farmers of Canada (DFC), Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), Ottawa (Ontario).
80. McDougall S., Bryan M.A., Tiddy R.M. Effect of treatment with the nonsteroidal antiinflammatory meloxicam on milk production, somatic cell count, probability of re-treatment, and culling of dairy cows with mild clinical mastitis. J Dairy Sci 2009, 92:4421-4431.