A model for detection of individual cow mastitis based on an indicator measured in milk

Journal of Dairy Science

Volumn 89, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 2980-2998

  Chagunda, M G G ^a   Friggens, N C ^a   Rasmussen, M D ^a   Larsen, T ^a  

^a DANISH INSTITUTE OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Biological model; Indicator in milk; Mastitis; Risk

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746928296     PISSN: 00220302     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72571-1     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Baxter, E. S., P. M. Clarke, F. H. Dodd, and A. S. Foot. 1950. Factors affecting the rate of machine milking. J. Dairy Res. 17:117-127.
2. Bogin, E., G. Ziv, and J. Avidar. 1976. Enzyme activities in normal and inflamed bovine udder tissues. Zentralbl. Veterinaermed. A 23:460-466.
3. Bogin, E., G. Ziv, J. Avidar, B. Rivetz, S. Gordin, and A. Saran. 1977. Distribution of lactate dehydrogenase isoenzymes in normal and inflamed bovine udders and milk. Res. Vet. Sci. 22:198-200.
4. Bramley, A. J., and F. H. Dodd. 1984. Review on the progress of dairy science: Mastitis control-Progress and prospects. J. Dairy Res. 51:481-512.
5. Chagunda, M. G. G., T. Larsen, M. Bjerring, and K. L. Ingvartsen. 2006. L-Lactate dehydrogenase and N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase activities in bovine milk as indicators of clinical mastitis. J. Dairy Res. (accepted)
6. Deluyker, H. A., S. N. Van Oye, and J. F. Boucher. 2005. Factors affecting cure and somatic cell count after Pirlimycin treatment of subclinical mastitis in lactating cows. J. Dairy Sci. 88:604-614.
7. de Mol, R. M., A. Keen, G. H. Kroeze, and J. M. F. H. Achten. 1999. Description of a detection model for oestrus and diseases in dairy cattle based on time series analysis combined with a Kalmar filter. Comp. Electr. Agric. 22:171-185.
8. de Mol, R. M., and W. Ouweltjes. 2001. Detection model for mastitis in cows milked in an automatic milking system. Prev. Vet. Med. 49:71-82.
9. de Mol, R. M., and W. E. Woldt. 2001. Application of fuzzy logic in automated cow status monitoring. J. Dairy Sci. 84:400-410.
10. France, J., and J. H. M. Thornley. 1984. Mathematical Models in Agriculture. Butterworths, London.
11. Fricke, P. M. 2002. Scanning the future-Ultrasonology as a reproductive management tool in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 85:1918-1926.
12. Friggens, N. C., and M. G. G. Chagunda. 2005. Prediction of the reproductive status of cattle on the basis of milk progesterone measures: Model description. Theriogenology 64:155-190.
13. Friggens, N. C., G. C. Emmans, and R. F. Veerkamp. 1999. On the use of simple ratios between lactation curve coefficients to describe parity effects on milk production. Livest. Prod. Sci. 62:1-13.
14. Frost, A. R., C. P. Schofield, S. A. Beaulah, T. T. Mottram, J. A. Lines, and C. M. Wathes. 1997. A review of livestock monitoring and the need for integrated systems. Comp. Electr. Agric. 17:139-159.
15. Giesecke, W. H., W. H. Gerneke, and I. B. J. van Rensburg. 1972. The morphology of the bovine teat canal. J. S. Afr. Vet. Assoc. 43:351-354.
16. Gröhn, Y. T., D. J. Wilson, R. N. Gonzalez, J. A. Hertl, H. Schulte, G. Bennett, and Y. H. Schukken. 2004. Effect of pathogen-specific clinical mastitis on milk yield in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 87:3358-3374.
17. Hamann, J. 1987. Effect of machine milking on teat end condition-A literature review. In Machine Milking and Mastitis. Pages 33-39 in International Dairy Federation (IDF) Bulletin no. 215, Brussels, Belgium.
18. Hamann, J. 2005. Diagnosis of mastitis and indicators of milk quality. Pages 82-90 in Proc. 4th Intl. Dairy Fed. (IDF) Mastitis Conf., Mastitis in Dairy Production: Current Knowledge and Future Solutions. H. Hogeveen, ed. Wageningen Academic Publ., Wageningen, The Netherlands.
19. Hamann, J., and M. Duck. 1984. Modification of milking systems in relations to the prevention of mastitis. Milchwissenschaft 39:12-15.
20. Hamann, J., and V. Krömker. 1997. Potential of specific milk composition variables for cow health management. Livest. Prod. Sci. 48:201-208.
21. Harmon, R. J. 1994. Physiology of mastitis and factors affecting somatic cell counts. J. Dairy Sci. 77:2103-2112.
22. Hillerton, J. E., A. J. Bramley, R. T. Staker, and C. H. McKinnon. 1995. Patterns of intramammary infection and clinical mastitis over a 5-year period in a closely monitored herd applying mastitis control measures. J. Dairy Res. 62:39-50.
23. Hillerton, J. E. 1999. Redefining Mastitis Based on Somatic Cell Count. Pages 4-6 in Bulletin 345. International Dairy Federation, Brussels, Belgium.
24. Hillerton, J. E. 2000. Detecting Mastitis Cow-Side. Proc. 39th Mtg. Natl. Mastitis Council, Atlanta, GA. Natl. Mastitis Counc., Verona, WI.
25. IDF. 1997. Recommendations for Presentation of Mastitis-Related Data. Bulletin 321. International Dairy Federation, Brussels, Belgium.
26. Ingvartsen, K. L., R. J. Dewhurst, and N. C. Friggens. 2003. On the relationship between lactation performance and health: Is it yield or metabolic imbalance that causes production diseases in dairy cattle? A position paper. Livest. Prod. Sci. 83:277-308.
27. Kato, K., K. Mori, and N. Katoh. 1989. Contribution of leucocytes of the origin of lactate dehydrogenase isozymes in milk of bovine mastitis. Jpn. J. Vet. Sci. 51:530-539.
28. Kitchen, B. J., G. Middleton, I. G. Durwar, R. J. Andrews, and M. C. Salmon. 1980. Mastitis diagnostic tests to estimate mammary gland epithelial cell damage. J. Dairy Sci. 63:978-983.
29. Knight, C. H., D. F. Beever, and A. Sorensen. 1999. Metabolic load to be expected from different genotypes under different systems. Br. Soc. Anim. Sci. Occ. Publ. 24:27-35.
30. Korsgaard, I. R., and P. Løvendahl. 2002. An introduction to multiprocess class II mixture models. Proc. 7th World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., Montpellier, France.
31. Kronfeld, D. 1976. The potential importance of the proportions of glucogenic, lipogenic and amonigenic nutrients in regard to the health and productivity of dairy cows. Adv. Anim. Physiol. Nutr. 7:5-26.
32. Laevens, H., H. Deluyker, Y. H. Schukken, L. De Meulemeester, R. Vandermeersch, E. De Muelenaere, and A. De Kruif. 1997. Influence of parity and stage of lactation on the somatic cell count in bacteriologically negative dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 80:3219-3226.
33. Larsen, T. 2005. Determination of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity in milk by a fluorometric assay. J. Dairy Res. 72:209-216.
34. Larsen, T. 2003. Samstilling af analyser for lactate dehydrogenase, N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminase og somatic cell count på mælkeprøver. Internal Report. Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Research Centre Foulum, Foulum, Denmark. 7 pp. (in Danish).
35. Lucy, M. C. 2001. Reproductive loss in high-producing dairy cattle: Where will it end? J. Dairy Sci. 84:1277-1293.
36. Ma, Y., C. Ryan, D. M. Barbano, D. M. Galton, M. A. Rudan, and K. J. Boor. 2000. Effects of somatic cell count on quality and shelf-life of pasteurized fluid milk. J. Dairy Sci. 83:264-274.
37. Mottram, T., M. Velasco-Garcia, P. Berry, P. Richards, J. Ghesquiere, and L. Masson. 2002. Automatic on-line analysis of milk constituents (urea, ketones, enzymes and hormones) using biosensors. Comp. Clin. Pathol. 11:50-58.
38. Nielsen, N. I., N. C. Friggens, M. G. G. Chagunda, and K. L. Ingvartsen. 2005. Predicting risk of ketosis in dairy cows using in-line measurements of β-hydroxybutyrate in milk: A biological model. J. Dairy Sci. 88:2441-2453.
39. Norberg, E., H. Hogeveen, I. R. Korsgaard, N. C. Friggens, K. H. M. N. Sloth, and P. Løvendahl. 2004. Electrical conductivity of milk: Ability to predict mastitis status. J. Dairy Sci. 87:1099-1107.
40. Østergaard, S., M. G. G. Chagunda, N. C. Friggens, T. W. Bennedsgaard, and I. C. Klaas. 2005. Stochastic simulation modeling of pathogen specific mastitis control in a dairy herd. J. Dairy Sci. 88:4243-4257.
41. Peeler, E. J., M. J. Green, J. L. Fitzpatrick, K. L. Morgan, and L. E. Green. 2000. Risk factors associated with clinical mastitis in low somatic cell count British dairy herds. J. Dairy Sci. 83:2464-2472.
42. Ribeiro, A. R., F. Garino, Jr., J. A. B. Silva, E. T. Watanabe, C. R. Valle, and E. O. Costa. 2001. Seasonality on the occurrence of environmental bovine mastitis. Napgama 4:10-14.
43. Seegers, H., C. Fourichon, and F. Beaudeau. 2003. Production effects related to mastitis and mastitis economics in dairy cattle herds. Vet. Res. 34:475-491.
44. Smith, A. F. M., and M. West. 1983. Monitoring renal transplants: An application of the multiprocess Kalman filter. Biometrics 39:867-878.
45. Sloth, K. H. M. N., N. C. Friggens, P. Løvendahl, P. H. Andersen, J. Jensen, and K. L. Ingvartsen. 2003. Potential for improving description of bovine udder health status by combined analysis of milk parameters. J. Dairy Sci. 86:1221-1232.
46. Woolford, M. W., J. H. Williamson, and H. V. Henderson. 1998. Changes in electrical conductivity and somatic cell count between milk fractions from quarters subclinically infected with particular mastitis pathogens. J. Dairy Res. 65:187-198.