Beyond legitimacy. Can proceduralism say anything relevant about justice?

Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 183-200

  Ceva, Emanuela ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PAVIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Entitlements; Justice; Legitimacy; Proceduralism

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861774089     PISSN: 13698230     EISSN: 17438772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13698230.2012.651018     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Arneson, R. J., 1993. Democratic rights at national and workplace levels. In: D.
2. Copp, J. Hampton, and J. E. Roemer, eds. The idea of democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 118-148.
3. Beetham, D., 1991. The legitimation of power. London: Macmillan.
4. Beitz, C., 1989. Political equality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5. Buchanan, A., 2001. Political legitimacy and democracy. Ethics, 112, 689-719.
6. Ceva, E., 2007. Plural values and heterogeneous situations. Considerations on the scope for a political theory of justice. European Journal of Political Theory, 6, 359-375.
7. Ceva, E., 2009. Just procedures with controversial outcomes. On the grounds for substantive disputation within a procedural theory of justice. Res Publica, 15 (3), 219-235.
8. Ceva, E., Forthcoming 2012. Just interactions in value conflicts. The adversary argumentation principle. Politics, Philosophy and Economics. Doi: 10.1177/ 1470594x11416780.
9. Christiano, T., 1996. The rule of the many. Boulder, CO: Westview.
10. Cohen, J., 1994. Pluralism and proceduralism. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 69 (3), 589-618.
11. Copp, D., 1999. The idea of a legitimate state. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 28 (1), 3-45.
12. Dahl, R. A., 1956. A preface to democratic theory. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
13. Ehrenberg, K. M., 2003. Procedural justice and information in conflict-resolving institutions. Albany Law Review, 67, 167-209.
14. Elster, J., 1989. Solomonic judgements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Elster, J., 1997. The market and the forum: three varieties of political theory.
16. Bohman and W. Rehg, eds. Deliberative democracy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 3-24.
17. Estlund, D., 2007. Democratic authority. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18. Griffin, C. G., 2003. Democracy as a non-instrumentally just procedure. Journal of Political Philosophy, 11 (1), 111-121.
19. Hampshire, S., 1999. Justice is conflict. London: Duckworth.
20. Hinsch, W., 2010. Justice, legitimacy, and constitutional rights. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 13 (1), 39-54.
21. Hobbes, T., [1668] 1994. Leviathan. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
22. Kaplow, L., 1994. The value of accuracy in adjudication: an economic analysis.
23. Journal of Legal Studies, 23 (1), 307-401.
24. Kramer, M. A., 1997. Justice as constancy. Law and Philosophy, 16 (6), 561-580.
25. Locke, J., [1690] 1990. Second treatise on civil government. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
26. Marshaw, J. L., 1985. Due process in the administrative state. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
27. Miller, D., 1999. Principles of social justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28. Morss, J. R., 2004. Crime stories: Posnerian pragmatism, Rawlsian pure procedural justice, and the fictional problem. Deakin Law Review, 9 (2), 643-654.
29. Nelson, W., 1980. The very idea of pure procedural justice. Ethics, 90 (4), 502-511.
30. Nussbaum, M., 2006. Frontiers of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31. Peter, F., 2008. Democratic legitimacy. New York, NY: Routledge.
32. Rawls, J., 1971. A theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. Rawls, J., 1993. Political liberalism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
34. Raz, J., 1986. The morality of freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. Resnick, D., 1977. Due process and procedural justice. In: J. R. Pennock and J. W. Chapman, eds. Due process, Nomos XVIII. New York, NY: New York University Press, 206-228.
36. Sadurski, W., 1984. Social justice and legal justice. Law and Philosophy, 3 (3), 329-354.
37. Simmons, J., 1999. Justification and legitimacy. Ethics, 109, 739-771.
38. Solum, L. B., 2004. Procedural justice. Southern California Law Review, 78, 181-322.
39. Waldron, J., 1999. Law and disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40. Wall, S., 2007. Democracy and equality. Philosophical Quarterly, 57 (228), 416-438.