Just procedures with controversial outcomes: On the grounds for substantive disputation within a procedural theory of justice

Res Publica

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 219-235

  Ceva, Emanuela ^a,b  

^a SCUOLA UNIVERSITARIA SUPERIORE IUSS PAVIA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PAVIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Civil disobedience; Conscientious objection; Exemptions; Procedural justice; Substantive justice

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350376216     PISSN: 13564765     EISSN: 15728692     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11158-009-9092-4     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Brettschneider, Corey. 2005. Balancing procedures and outcomes within democratic theory: Core values and judicial review. Political Studies 53: 423-441.
2. Ceva, Emanuela. 2007. Plural values and heterogeneous situations: Considerations on the scope for a political theory of justice. European Journal of Political Theory 6: 359-375.
3. Ceva, Emanuela. 2008. Impure procedural justice and the management of conflicts about values. Polish Journal of Philosophy 2: 5-22.
4. Cohen, Gerald 2003. Facts and principles. Philosophy and Public Affairs 31: 211-245.
5. Cohen, Joshua. 1994. Pluralism and proceduralism. Chicago-Kent Law Review 69: 589-618.
6. Dworkin, Ronald. 1977. Taking rights seriously. London: Duckworth.
7. Estlund, David. 2007. Democratic authority: A philosophical framework. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
8. Faitini, Tiziana, and Alessadroantonio Povino. 2008. Handling religious diversity: The case of 'holy/rest days' in Italy. Human Affairs 18: 23-36.
9. Griffin, Christopher G. 2003. Democracy as a non-instrumentally just procedure. The Journal of Political Philosophy 11: 111-121.
10. Gustafsson, Martin. 2004. On Rawls's distinction between perfect and imperfect procedural justice. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34: 300-305.
11. Hampshire, Stuart. 1999. Justice is conflict. London: Duckworth.
12. McCarthy, Thomas. 1992. Practical discourse: On the relation of morality to politics. In Habermas and the public sphere, ed. Calhoun Craig. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Nelson, William. 1980. The very idea of pure procedural justice. Ethics 90: 502-511.
14. Rawls, John. 1971. A theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Rawls, John. 1993. Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
16. Raz, Joseph. 1979. The authority of law: Essays on law and morality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
17. Rosenfeld, Michael. 1998. A pluralist critique of contractarian proceduralism. Ratio Juris 11: 291-319.
18. Smith, William. 2008. Civil disobedience and social power: Reflections on Habermas. Contemporary Political Theory 7: 72-89.