An analysis of day-to-day variations in individual space-time accessibility

Journal of Transport Geography

Volumn 23, Issue , 2012, Pages 81-91

  Neutens, Tijs ^a   Delafontaine, Matthias ^a   Scott, Darren M ^b   De Maeyer, Philippe ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Inter personal variability; Public services; Space time accessibility; Time geography

Indexed keywords

ACCESSIBILITY; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; PUBLIC SERVICE; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

BELGIUM; EAST FLANDERS; GHENT;

EID: 84861742915     PISSN: 09666923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Beckmann M.J., Golob T.F., Zahavi Y. Travel probability fields and urban spatial structure: empirical tests. Environment and Planning A 1983, 15(6):727-738.
2. Beckmann M.J., Golob T.F., Zahavi Y. Travel probability fields and urban spatial structure: theory. Environment and Planning A 1983, 15(5):593-606.
3. Boulin J.Y. Local time policies in Europe. Gender Divisions and Working Time. The New Economy: Changing Patterns of Work, Care and Public Policy in Europe and North America 2006, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. D. Perrons, C. Fagan, L. McDowell, K. Ray, K. Ward (Eds.).
4. Buliung R.N., Roorda M.J., Remmel T.K. Exploring spatial variety in patterns of activity-travel behaviour: initial results from the Toronto Travel-Activity Panel Survey (TTAPS). Transportation 2008, 35(6):697-722.
5. Casas I. Social exclusion and the disabled: an accessibility approach. Professional Geographer 2007, 59(4):463-477.
6. Casas I., Horner M.W., Weber J. A comparison of three methods for identifying transport-based exclusion: a case study of children's access to urban opportunities in Erie and Niagara Counties, New York. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 2009, 3:227-245.
7. Castaigne, M., Cornelis, E., Frederix, R., Tampere, C., Toint, P., Viti, F., Walle, F., 2009. Behaviour and Mobility within the Week " BMW" . Final Report. Belgian Science Policy, Research Programme Science for a Sustainable Development, Brussels, p. 120.
8. Cullen I., Godson V. Urban networks: the structure of activity patterns. Progress in Planning 1975, 4:1-96.
9. Delafontaine M., Neutens T., Schwanen T., Van de Weghe N. The impact of opening hours on the equity of individual space-time accessibility. Computers Environment and Urban Systems 2011, 35:276-288.
10. Farber S., Paez A. My car, my friends, and me: a preliminary analysis of automobility and social activity participation. Journal of Transport Geography 2009, 17(3):216-225.
11. Farber S., Paez A., Mercado R.G., Roorda M., Morency C. A time-use investigation of shopping participation in three Canadian cities: is there evidence of social exclusion?. Transportation 2011, 38(1):17-44.
12. Geurs K.T., van Wee B. Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography 2004, 12(2):127-140.
13. Hägerstrand T. What about people in regional science?. Papers of the Regional Science Association 1970, 24(1):7-21.
14. Hanson S., Huff J.O. Assessing day-to-day variability in complex travel patterns. Transportation Research Record 1982, 891:18-24.
15. Healey P. The treatment of space and place in the new strategic spatial planning in Europe. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 2004, 28(1):45-67.
16. Hero R.E. The urban service delivery literature: some questions and considerations. Polity 1986, 18(4):659-677.
17. Huff J.O., Hanson S. Repetition and variability in urban travel. Geographical Analysis 1986, 18:19-29.
18. Jennrich R.I., Turner F.B. Measurement of non-circular home range. Journal of Theoretical Biology 1969, 22(2):227-237.
19. Kang H.J., Scott D.M. Exploring day-to-day variability in time use for household members. Transportation Research Part A - Policy and Practice 2010, 44(8):609-619.
20. Kenyon S., Lyons G. Introducing multitasking to the study of travel and ICT: examining its extent and assessing its potential importance. Transportation Research Part A - Policy and Practice 2007, 41(2):161-175.
21. Kim H.M., Kwan M.P. Space-time accessibility measures: a geocomputational algorithm with a focus on the feasible opportunity set and possible activity duration. Journal of Geographical Systems 2003, 5(1):71-91.
22. Kitamura R., Yamamoto T., Susilo Y.O., Axhausen K.W. How routine is a routine? An analysis of the day-to-day variability in prism vertex location. Transportation Research Part A - Policy and Practice 2006, 40(3):259-279.
23. Kwan M.P. Space-time and integral measures of individual accessibility: a comparative analysis using a point-based framework. Geographical Analysis 1998, 30(3):191-216.
24. Kwan M.P. Gender and individual access to urban opportunities: a study using space-time measures. Professional Geographer 1999, 51(2):210-227.
25. Kwan M.P. Gender differences in space-time constraints. Area 2000, 32(2):145-156.
26. Kwan M.P., Hong X.D. Network-based constraint-oriented choice set formation using GIS. Journal of Geographical Systems 1998, 5(1):139-162.
27. Kwan M.P., Weber J. Scale and accessibility: implications for the analysis of land use-travel interaction. Applied Geography 2008, 28(2):110-123.
28. Langford M., Higgs G. Accessibility and public service provision: evaluating the impacts of the Post Office Network Change Programme in the UK. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 2010, 35(4):585-601.
29. Lyons G. The introduction of social exclusion into the field of travel behaviour. Transport Policy 2003, 10(4):339-342.
30. Ma J., Goulias K.G. A dynamic analysis of person and household activity and travel patterns using data from the first two waves in the Puget Sound Transportation Panel. Transportation 1997, 24(3):309-331.
31. Miller H.J. Modeling accessibility using space-time prisms concepts within geographical information-systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 1991, 5(3):287-301.
32. Moccia F.D. Planning time: an emergent European practice. European Planning Studies 2000, 8(3):367-375.
33. Neutens T., Van de Weghe N., Witlox F., De Maeyer P. A three-dimensional network-based space-time prism. Journal of Geographical Systems 2008, 10(1):89-107.
34. Neutens T., Schwanen T., Witlox F., De Maeyer P. Equity of urban service delivery: a comparison of different accessibility measures. Environment and Planning A 2010, 42(7):1613-1635.
35. Neutens T., Schwanen T., Witlox F., De Maeyer P. Evaluating the temporal organization of public service provision using space-time accessibility analysis. Urban Geography 2010, 31(8):1039-1064.
36. Neutens T., Versichele M., Schwanen T. Arranging place and time: a GIS toolkit to assess person-based accessibility of urban opportunities. Applied Geography 2010, 30(4):561-575.
37. Neutens T., Schwanen T., Witlox F. The prism of everyday life: towards a new research agenda for time geography. Transport Reviews 2011, 31(1):25-47.
38. Newsome T.H., Walcott W.A., Smith P.D. Urban activity spaces: illustrations and application of a conceptual model for integrating the time and space dimensions. Transportation 1998, 25(4):357-377.
39. Pas E., Koppelman F.S. An examination of day-to-day variability in individuals' urban travel behavior. Transportation 1986, 13:183-200.
40. Pas E.I. A flexible and integrated methodology for analytical classification of daily travel-activity behavior. Transportation Science 1983, 17(4):405-429.
41. Pas E.I. Intrapersonal variability and model goodness-of-fit. Transportation Research Part A - Policy and Practice 1987, 21(6):431-438.
42. Pas E.I., Sundar S. Intrapersonal variability in daily urban travel behavior: some additional evidence. Transportation 1995, 22(2):135-150.
43. Pendyala, R.M., Parashar, A., Muthyalagari, G.R., 2000. Measuring Day-to Day Variability in Travel Characteristics Using GPS Data. Paper Presented at the 79th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, January 9-14, 2001 Washington.
44. Pendyala R.M., Yamamoto T., Kitamura R. On the formulation of time-space prisms to model constraints on personal activity-travel engagement. Transportation 2002, 29(1):73-94.
45. Pirie G.H. Measuring accessibility: review and proposal. Environment and Planning A 1979, 11(3):299-312.
46. Pooler J. Measuring geographical accessibility: a review of current approaches and problems in the use of population potentials. Geoforum 1987, 18(3):269-289.
47. Roorda M.J., Ruiz T. Long- and short-term dynamics in activity scheduling: a structural equations approach. Transportation Research Part A - Policy and Practice 2008, 42(3):545-562.
48. Schönfelder S., Axhausen K.W. Activity spaces: measures of social exclusion?. Transport Policy 2003, 10(4):273-286.
49. Schwanen T., De Jong T. Exploring the juggling of responsibilities with space-time accessibility analysis. Urban Geography 2008, 29(6):556-580.
50. Schwanen T., Kwan M.P., Ren F. How fixed is fixed? Gendered rigidity of space-time constraints and geographies of everyday activities. Geoforum 2008, 39(6):2109-2121.
51. Soo J. Space-time prism vertices: exploring gender differences and multiple-peak distributions in arrival and departure times. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 2009, 9(4):380-396.
52. Susilo Y.O., Kitamura R. Analysis of day-to-day variability in an individual's action space - exploration of 6-week mobidrive travel diary data. Transportation and Land Development 2005, 2005:124-133.
53. Talen E., Anselin L. Assessing spatial equity: an evaluation of measures of accessibility to public playgrounds. Environment and Planning A 1998, 30(4):595-613.
54. Tsou K.W., Hung Y.T., Chang Y.L. An accessibility-based integrated measure of relative spatial equity in urban public facilities. Cities 2005, 22(6):424-435.
55. Weber J., Kwan M.P. Bringing time back in: a study on the influence of travel time variations and facility opening hours on individual accessibility. Professional Geographer 2002, 54(2):226-240.
56. Weber J., Kwan M.P. Evaluating the effects of geographic contexts on individual accessibility: a multilevel approach. Urban Geography 2003, 24(8):647-671.
57. Yamamoto T., Kitamura R., Pendyala R.M. Comparative analysis of time-space prism vertices for out-of-home activity engagement on working and nonworking days. Environment and Planning B - Planning and Design 2004, 31(2):235-250.
58. Zandvliet R., Bertolini L., Dijst M. Towards planning for a mobile society: mobile and residential populations and the performance of places. European Planning Studies 2008, 16(10):1459-1472.