'Patches don't have gender': What is not open in open source software

New Media and Society

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 669-683

  Nafus, Dawn ^a  

^a INTEL CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

F LOSS; gender; knowledge economy; open source

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861726960     PISSN: 14614448     EISSN: 14617315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1461444811422887     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Becker GA Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1993:.
2. Bonilla-Silva ERacism without Racists: Color-blind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in the United States. New York: Rowman & Littlefield; 2006:.
3. Born G.Immateriality and sociality: The dynamics of intellectual property in a computer software research culture.Social Anthropology. 1996;4 (2): 101-116.
4. Coleman G.High-tech guilds in the era of global capital.Anthropology of Work Review. 2001;22:28-32.
5. Coleman G,Golub A.Hacker practice: Moral genres and the cultural articulation of liberalism.Anthropological Theory. 2008;8:255.
6. Corneliussen H.Disrupting the impression of stability in the gender-technology relation. Fifth European Symposium on Gender & ICT; 2009Bremen, Germany; 2009.
7. Downey GLThe Machine in Me: An Anthropologist Sits among Computer Engineers. London: Routledge; 1998:.
8. Evans C,Glover J,Guerrier Y,Wilson CDiversity Policies: Guiding Principles. London: The Royal Academy of Engineering; 2007:.
9. Geneve A,Nelson K,Christie R.Passion, women and the games industry: Influences on women's participation in the Australian digital content industry. Paper presented at Women in Games; 2008Warwick, UK; 2008.
10. GhoshR (1998) Cooking pot markets: An economic model for the trade in free goods and services on the internet. First Monday3(3). Available at: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/580 (accessed 27 September 2011).
11. Ghosh R,Glott A,Krieger B,Robles BFree/Libre and Open Source Software: Survey and Study. Part IV: Survey of Developers. Maastricht: International Institute of Infonomics /Merit; 2002:.
12. Gill R.Cool, creative and egalitarian? Exploring gender in project-based new media work in Europe.Information, Communication, and Society. 2002;5 (1): 70-89.
13. Gill R,Grint KThe Gender-Technology Relation: Contemporary Theory and Research. London: Taylor & Francis; 1995:.
14. Green E,Adam AVirtual Gender: Technology, Consumption and Identity. London: Routledge; 2001:.
15. Helmreich SSilicon Second Nature. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1998:.
16. Kelty C.Culture's open sources: Software, copyright, and cultural critique.Anthropological Quarterly. 2004;77 (3): 499-506.
17. KliefTFaulknerW (2002) Boys and their Toys: Men's Pleasures in Technology. Available at: www.rcss.ed.ac.uk/sigis/public/backgrounddocs/BOYS_AND_THEIR_TOYS-ZIF8.rtf (consulted June 2005).
18. Kotamraju NSociety Online. Howard PJones S, ed. London: Sage; 2004:.
19. Leach J.Nafus D,Krieger B.Freedom imagined: Morality and aesthetics in open source software design.Ethnos. 2009;74 (1): 51-77.
20. Lessig LCode and Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books; 2000:.
21. Lie MHe, She and IT Revisited: New Perspectives on Gender in the Information Society. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk; 2003:.
22. Lin YuweiEncyclopedia of Gender and Information Technology. Trauth E, ed. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing; 2006:.
23. Margolis J,Fisher AUnlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2002:.
24. MillJS (2008/1859) On Liberty. Forgotten Books. www.forgottenbooks.org.
25. Nakamura L.Don't hate the player, hate the game: The racialization of labor in World of Warcraft.Critical Studies of Communication. 2009;26 (2): 128-144.
26. RaymondE (1998) Homesteading on the Noosphere. First Monday3(10). Available at: http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue3_10/raymond/index.html (accessed 27 September 2011).
27. RaymondE (2005) A Portrait of J. Random Hacker. Available at: http://www.retrologic.com/jargon/appendixb.html (consulted June 2005).
28. Schiebinger LHas Feminism Changed Science?. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2001:.
29. SorensenK (2002) Love, Duty and the S-curve: An Overview of Some Current Literature on Gender and ICT. Available at: www.rcss.ed.ac.uk/sigis/public/documents/SIGIS_D02_Part1.pdf (consulted June 2005).
30. Terranova T.Free labor: Producing culture for the digital economy.Social Text. 2000;63 (2): 33-58.
31. Turkle STechnology and Women's Voices. Kramarae C, ed. New York: Pergamon Press; 1986:.
32. Turkle S,Papert S.Epistemological pluralism: Styles and voices within the computer culture.Signs. 1990;16:128-157.
33. Ullman EClose to the Machine: Technophilia and its Discontents. San Francisco, CA: City Lights Books; 1997:.
34. Wajcman J.Reflections on gender and technology studies: In what state is the Art?.Social Studies of Science. 2000;30 (3): 447-464.
35. Weber SThe Success of Open Source. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2004:.
36. Winter D,Huff C.Adapting the internet: Comments from a women-only electronic forum.The American Sociologist. 1996;27 (1): 30-54.
37. Zeitlyn D.Gift economies in the development of Open Source software: Anthropological reflections.Research Policy. 2003;32 (7): 1287-1291.