Different effects of sonoporation on cell morphology and viability

Bosnian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 64-68

  Zhang, Ji Zhen ^a   Saggar, Jasdeep K ^b   Zhou, Zhao Li ^c   Bing Hu, ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY AFFILIATED SIXTH PEOPLE S HOSPITAL   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c SHANGHAI INSTITUTE OF MATERIA MEDICA   (China)

Author keywords

Cell morphology; Drug delivery; Low frequency ultrasound; Microbubble contrast agents; Molecular delivery; Sonoporation; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861717263     PISSN: 15128601     EISSN: 18404812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.17305/bjbms.2012.2497     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Langer R. Drug delivery and targeting. Nature 1998; 392(6679 Suppl):5-10.
2. Feril LB, Jr. Ultrasound-mediated gene transfection. Methods Mol Biol 2009;542:179-194.
3. Mitragotri S. Healing sound: the use of ultrasound in drug delivery and other therapeutic applications. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2005;4(3):255-260.
4. Pua EC, Zhong P. Ultrasound-mediated drug delivery. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 2009; 28(1):64-75.
5. Zderic V. Ultrasound-enhanced drug and gene delivery: a review. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2008; 2008:4472.
6. Li W, Liu S, Ren J, Xiong H, Yan X, Wang Z. Gene transfection to retinal ganglion cells mediated by ultrasound microbubbles in vitro. Acad Radiol 2009;i6(9):1086-1094.
7. Negishi Y, Matsuo K, Endo-Takahashi Y, Suzuki K, Matsuki Y, Takagi N, et al. Delivery of an angiogenic gene into ischemic muscle by novel bubble liposomes followed by ultrasound exposure. Pharm Res 2010; 28(4):712-719.
8. Mohan P, Rapoport N. Doxorubicin as a molecular nanotheranostic agent: effect of doxorubicin encapsulation in micelles or nano-emulsions on the ultrasound-mediated intracellular delivery and nuclear trafficking. Mol Pharm 2010;7(6):1959-1973.
9. Kudo N, Okada K, Yamamoto K. Sonoporation by single-shot pulsed ultrasound with microbubbles adjacent to cells. Biophys J 2009; 96(2):4866-4876.
10. Schlicher RK, Radhakrishna H, Tolentino TP, Apkarian RP, Zarnitsyn V, Prausnitz MR. Mechanism of intracellular delivery by acoustic cavitation. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006; 32(6): 915-924.
11. Fan Z, Kumon RE, Park J, Deng CX. Intracellular delivery and calcium transients generated in sonoporation facilitated by microbubbles. J Control Release 2009;142(1):31-39.
12. Guzman HR, Nguyen DX, McNamara AJ, Prausnitz MR. Equilibrium loading of cells with macromolecules by ultrasound: effects of molecular size and acoustic energy. J Pharm Sci 2002; 91(7):1693-1701.
13. Hutcheson JD, Schlicher RK, Hicks HK, Prausnitz MR. Saving cells from ultrasound-induced apoptosis: quantification of cell death and uptake following sonication and effects of targeted calcium chelation. Ultrasound Med Biol 2010; 36(6):1008-1021.
14. Mehier-Humbert S, Bettinger T, Yan F, Guy RH. Plasma membrane poration induced by ultrasound exposure: implication for drug delivery. J Control Release 2005;104(1):213-222.
15. Zarnitsyn V, Rostad CA, Prausnitz MR. Modeling transmembrane transport through cell membrane wounds created by acoustic cavitation. Biophys J 2008;95(9):4124-4138.
16. Wu Xian-mei, Qian Meng-lu. Vibration measuring technique using laser interferometer for calibration of transducers. TECHNICAL ACOUSTICS 2000;19(2):83-85.
17. Ohl CD, Wolfrum B. Detachment and sonoporation of adherent HeLa-cells by shock wave-induced cavitation. Biochim Biophys Acta 2003;1624(1-3):131-138.
18. Zarnitsyn VG, Prausnitz MR. Physical parameters influencing optimization of ultrasound-mediated DNA transfection. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004;30(4):527-538.
19. Tachibana K, Uchida T, Ogawa K, Yamashita N, Tamura K. Induction of cell-membrane porosity by ultrasound. Lancet 1999;353(9162):1409.
20. Forbes MM, Steinberg RL, O'Brien WD, Jr. Examination of inertial cavitation of Optison in producing sonoporation of chinese hamster ovary cells. Ultrasound Med Biol 2008; 34(12): 2009-2018
21. Lai CY, Wu CH, Chen CC, Li PC. Quantitative relations of acoustic inertial cavitation with sonoporation and cell viability. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006; 32(12):1931-1941.
22. Apfel RE. Acoustic cavitation: a possible consequence of biomedi-cal uses of ultrasound. Br J Cancer Suppl 1982; 5:140-146.
23. Karshafian R, Bevan PD, Williams R, Samac S, Burns PN. Sonoporation by ultrasound-activated microbubble contrast agents: effect of acoustic exposure parameters on cell membrane permeability and cell viability. Ultrasound Med Biol 2009;35(5):847-860.
24. Schlicher RK, Hutcheson JD, Radhakrishna H, Apkarian RP, Prausnitz MR. Changes in cell morphology due to plasma membrane wounding by acoustic cavitation. Ultrasound Med Biol 2010; 36(4):677-692.
25. Zhou Y, Kumon RE, Cui J, Deng CX. The size of sonoporation pores on the cell membrane. Ultrasound Med Biol 2009; 35(10):1756-1760.
26. Deng CX, Sieling F, Pan H, Cui J. Ultrasound-induced cell membrane porosity. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004;30(4):519-526.
27. Kumon RE, Aehle M, Sabens D, Parikh P, Han YW, Kourennyi D, et al. Spatiotemporal effects of sonoporation measured by realtime calcium imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 2009; 35(3):494-506.
28. Kumon RE, Aehle M, Sabens D, Parikh P, Kourennyi D, Deng CX. Ultrasound-induced calcium oscillations and waves in Chinese hamster ovary cells in the presence of microbubbles. Biophys J 2007; 93(6): L29-L31.
29. Hassan MA, Campbell P, Kondo T. The role of Ca(2+) in ultrasound-elicited bioeffects: progress, perspectives and prospects. Drug Discov Today 2010;15(21-22):892-906.
30. Kodama T, Tomita Y, Koshiyama K, Blomley MJ. Transfection effect of microbubbles on cells in superposed ultrasound waves and behavior of cavitation bubble. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006;32(6):905-914.
31. Rahim A, Taylor SL, Bush NL, ter Haar GR, Bamber JC, Porter CD. Physical parameters affecting ultrasound/microbubble-mediated gene delivery efficiency in vitro. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006;32(8):1269-1279.