Sonoporation by single-shot pulsed ultrasound with microbubbles adjacent to cells

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 96, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 4866-4876

  Kudo, Nobuki ^a   Okada, Kengo ^a   Yamamoto, Katsuyuki ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM ION;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL; CELL ADHESION; CELL DAMAGE; CELL INTERACTION; CELL MEMBRANE; CELL MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; CELL REGENERATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; COW; ENDOTHELIUM CELL; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; MICROBUBBLE; MICROSCOPY; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MOLECULAR SIZE; NONHUMAN; OBSERVATION; REGULATORY MECHANISM; SINGLE SHOT PULSED ULTRASOUND; SONOPORATION; ULTRASOUND;

EID: 68949086380     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: 15420086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.02.072     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bao, S., B. D. Thrall, and D. L. Miller. 1997. Transfection of a reporter plasmid into cultured cells by sonoporation in vitro. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 23:953-959.
2. Newman, C. M., A. Lawrie, A. F. Brisken, and D. C. Cumberland. 2001. Ultrasound gene therapy: on the road from concept to reality. Echocardiography. 18:339-347.
3. Miller, M. W., D. L. Miller, and A. A. Brayman. 1996. A review of in vitro bioeffects of inertial ultrasonic cavitation from a mechanistic perspective. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 22:1131-1154.
4. Miller, D. L., S. V. Pislaru, and J. E. Greenleaf. 2002. Sonoporation: mechanical DNA delivery by ultrasonic cavitation. Somat. Cell Mol. Genet. 27:115-134.
5. Greenleaf, W. J., M. E. Bolander, G. Sarkar, M. B. Goldring, and J. F. Greenleaf. 1998. Artificial cavitation nuclei significantly enhance acoustically induced cell transfection. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 24:587-595.
6. Lawrie, A., A. F. Brisken, S. E. Francis, D. C. Cumberland, D. C. Crossman, et al. 2000. Microbubble-enhanced ultrasound for vascular gene delivery. Gene Ther. 7:2023-2027.
7. Taniyama, Y., K. Tachibana, K. Hiraoka, T. Namba, K. Yamasaki, et al. 2002. Local delivery of plasmid DNA into rat carotid artery using ultrasound. Circulation. 105:1233-1239.
8. Miller, D. L., and J. Quddus. 2000. Sonoporation of monolayer cells by diagnostic ultrasound activation of contrast-agent gas bodies. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 26:661-667.
9. Miller, D. L., and J. Quddus. 2001. Lysis and sonoporation of epidermoid and phagocytic monolayer cells by diagnostic ultrasound activation of contrast agent gas bodies. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 27:1107-1113.
10. de Jong, N., P. J. Frinking, A. Bouakaz, M. Goorden, T. Schourmans, et al. 2000. Optical imaging of contrast agent microbubbles in an ultrasound field with a 100-MHz camera. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 26:487-492.
11. Ohl, C. D., and R. Ikink. 2003. Shock-wave-induced jetting of micronsize bubbles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90:214502.
12. Postema, M., A. van Wamel, C. T. Lancee, and N. de Jong. 2004. Ultrasound-induced encapsulated microbubble phenomena. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 30:827-840.
13. Wolfrum, B., R. Mettin, T. Kurz, and W. Lauterborn. 2002. Observations of pressure-wave-excited contrast agent bubbles in the vicinity of cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 81:5060-5062.
14. van Wamel, A., A. Bouakaz, M. Versluis, and N. de Jong. 2004. Micromanipulation of endothelial cells: ultrasound-microbubble-cell interaction. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 30:1255-1258.
15. Okada, K., N. Kudo, K. Niwa, and K. Yamamoto. 2005. A basic study on sonoporation with microbubbles exposed to pulsed ultrasound. J. Med. Ultrasonics. 32:3-11.
16. Prentice, P., A. Cuschieri, K. Dholakia, M. Prausnitz, and P. Campbell. 2005. Membrane disruption by optically controlled microbubble cavitation. Nat. Phys. 1:107-110.
17. Ohl, C. D., M. Arora, R. Ikink, N. de Jong, M. Versluis, et al. 2006. Sonoporation from jetting cavitation bubbles. Biophys. J. 91:4285-4295.
18. Deng, C. X., F. Sieling, H. Pan, and J. Cui. 2004. Ultrasound-induced cell membrane porosity. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 30:519-526.
19. Mehier-Humbert, S., T. Bettinger, F. Yan, and R. H. Guy. 2005. Plasma membrane poration induced by ultrasound exposure: implication for drug delivery. J. Control. Release. 104:213-222.
20. Humphrey, V. F. 2007. Review ultrasound and matter - physical interactions. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 93:195-211.
21. Inoue, T., and H. Osatake. 1988. A new drying method of biological specimens for scanning electron microscopy: the t-butyl alcohol freeze-drying method. Arch. Histol. Cytol. 51:53-59.
22. Karatekin, E., O. Sandre, H. Guitouni, N. Borghi, P. Puech, et al. 2003. Cascades of transient pores in giant vesicles: line tension and transport. Biophys. J. 84:1734-1749.
23. Steinhardt, R. A., G. Bi, and J. M. Alderton. 1994. Cell membrane resealing by a vesicular mechanism similar to neurotransmitter release. Science. 263:390-393.
24. McNeil, P. L., and R. A. Steinhardt. 1997. Loss, restoration, and maintenance of plasma membrane integrity. J. Cell Biol. 137:1-4.
25. McNeil, P. L., and T. Kirchhausen. 2005. An emergency response team for membrane repair. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6:499-505.
26. Olson, H. G., and F. G. Hammitt. 1969. High-speed photographic studies of ultrasonically induced cavitation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 46:1272-1283.
27. Lauterborn, W. 1982. Cavitation bubble dynamics - new tools for an intricate problem. Appl. Sci. Res. 38:165-178.
28. Kudo, N., T. Miyaoka, K. Okada, and K. Yamamoto. 2002. Study on mechanism of cell damage caused by microbubbles exposed to ultrasound. IEEE Ultrasonics Symp. Proc. 2:1351-1354.
29. Henglein, A., R. Ulrich, and J. Lilie. 1989. Luminescence and chemical action by pulsed ultrasound. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 111:1974-1979.
30. Lawrie, A., A. F. Brisken, S. E. Francis, D. Wyllie, E. Kiss-Toth, et al. 2003. Ultrasound-enhanced transgene expression in vascular cells is not dependent upon cavitation-induced free radicals. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 29:1453-1461.
31. Crum, L. A. 1984. Acoustic cavitation series: part five: rectified diffusion. Ultrasonics. 22:215-223.
32. Miller, D. L., and A. R. Williams. 1989. Bubble cycling as the explanation of the promotion of ultrasonic cavitation in a rotating tube exposure system. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 15:641-648.
33. Christiansen, J. P., B. A. French, A. L. Klibanov, S. Kaul, and J. R. Lindner. 2003. Targeted tissue transfection with ultrasound destruction of plasmid-bearing cationic microbubbles. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 29:1759-1767.
34. Leong-Poi, H., J. Christiansen, A. L. Klibanov, S. Kaul, and J. R. Lindner. 2003. Noninvasive assessment of angiogenesis by ultrasound and microbubbles targeted to alpha(v)-integrins. Circulation. 107:455-460.
35. Marmottant, P., and S. Hilgenfeldt. 2003. Controlled vesicle deformation and lysis by single oscillating bubbles. Nature. 423:153-156.
36. Koshiyama, K., T. Kodama, T. Yano, and S. Fujikawa. 2006. Structural change in lipid bilayers and water penetration induced by shock waves: molecular dynamics simulations. Biophys. J. 91:2198-2205.
37. Leighton, T. G. 1997. The Acoustic Bubble. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
38. Tachibana, K., T. Uchida, K. Ogawa, N. Yamashita, and K. Tamura. 1999. Induction of cell-membrane porosity by ultrasound. Lancet. 353:1409.
39. Ross, J. P., X. Cai, J. F. Chiu, J. Yang, and J. Wu. 2002. Optical and atomic force microscopic studies on sonoporation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111:1161-1164.
40. 2+ transients in endothelial cells from human umbilical vein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 91:2940-2944.
41. Kumon, R. E., M. Aehle, D. Sabens, P. Parikh, D. Kourennyi, et al. 2007. Ultrasound-induced calcium oscillations and waves in Chinese hamster ovary cells in the presence of microbubbles. Biophys. J. 93:L29-L31.