Screening CT colonography: Multicenter survey of patient experience, preference, and potential impact on adherence

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 198, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1361-1366

  Pooler, B Dustin ^a   Baumel, Mark J ^b   Cash, Brooks D ^c   Moawad, Fouad J ^c   Riddle, Mark S ^d   Patrick, Amy M ^e   Damiano, Mark ^c   Lee, Matthew H ^a   Kim, David H ^a   Del Rio, Alejandro Muñoz ^a   Pickhardt, Perry J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b Colon Health Centers of America ^*  (United States)

^c UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

^d NAVAL MEDICAL RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^e Mid Atlantic GI Consultants   (United States)

Author keywords

Colorectal cancer; CT colonography; Optical colonoscopy; Virtual colonoscopy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; APPLICATION SITE DISCOMFORT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEDATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INSUFFLATION; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PREFERENCE; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84861626153     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.7671     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer Statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 2010; 60:277-300
2. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology 2008; 134:1570-1595 (Pubitemid 351615355)
3. Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D, et al. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology 2003; 124:544-560 (Pubitemid 36169269)
4. Pignone M, Rich M, Teutsch SM, Berg AO, Lohr KN. Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2002; 137:132-141 (Pubitemid 34779159)
5. Holden DJ, Jonas DE, Porterfield DS, Reuland D, Harris R. Systematic review: enhancing the use and quality of colorectal cancer screening. Ann Intern Med 2010; 152:668-676
6. Graser A, Stieber P, Nagel D, et al. Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population. Gut 2009; 58:241-248
7. Johnson CD, Chen M-H, Toledano AY, et al. Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med 2008; 359:1207-1217
8. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003; 349:2191-2200 (Pubitemid 37485135)
9. Regge D, Laudi C, Galatola G, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomographic colonography for the detection of advanced neoplasia in individuals at increased risk of colorectal cancer. JAMA 2009; 301:2453-2461
10. [No authors listed]. Summaries for patients: screening for colorectal cancer-U.S. Preventative Services Task Force recommendation. Ann Intern Med 2008; 149:1-44
11. Rex DK, Johnson DA, Anderson JC, Schoenfeld PS, Burke CA, Inadomi JM. American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009. (corrected) Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104:739-750
12. Pickhardt PJ. Incidence of colonic perforation at CT colonography: review of existing data and implications for screening of asymptomatic adults. Radiology 2006; 239:313-316
13. Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Laghi A, Zullo A, Kim DH, Morini S. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography: the impact of not reporting diminutive lesions. Cancer 2007; 109:2213-2221 (Pubitemid 46801550)
14. Knudsen AB, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Rutter CM, et al. Cost-effectiveness of computed tomographic colonography screening for colorectal cancer in the Medicare population. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010; 102:1238-1252
15. Moawad FJ, Maydonovitch CL, Cullen PA, Barlow DS, Jenson DW, Cash BD. CT colonography may improve colorectal cancer screening compliance. AJR 2010; 195:1118-1123
16. Pickhardt PJ. Screening CT colonography: how I do it. AJR 2007; 189:290-298 (Pubitemid 47195912)
17. Yee J. CT colonography: techniques and applications. Radiol Clin North Am 2009; 47:133-145
18. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Website. National Center for Health Statistics. 2009: with special feature on medical terminology. www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/hus09.pdf. Published 2010. Accessed February 13, 2012
19. Waring JP, Baron TH, Hirota WK, et al. Guidelines for conscious sedation and monitoring during gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58:317-322
20. Shinners TJ, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, Jones DA, Olsen CH. Patient-controlled room air insufflation versus automated carbon dioxide delivery for CT colonography. AJR 2006; 186:1491-1496 (Pubitemid 46112509)
21. Stoop EM, de Haan MC, de Wijkerslooth TR, et al. Participation and yield of colonoscopy versus non-cathartic CT colonography in population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2012; 13:55-64
22. Woolf SH. The best screening test for colorectal cancer: a personal choice. N Engl J Med 2000; 343:1641-1643 (Pubitemid 32162991)