Evaluation of compressive strength in the first premolars between young and elderly people: Ex vivo study

Gerodontology

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2012, Pages

  De Noronha, Fernando ^a   Scelza, Miriam F Z ^b   Da Silva, Licinio E ^a   De Carvalho, Waldimir R ^a  

^a FLUMINENSE FEDERAL UNIVERSITY   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

biomechanics; elderly; geriatric dentistry

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGING; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL PROCEDURE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MAXILLA; MECHANICAL STRESS; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; TOOTH FRACTURE; TOOTH ROOT;

ADOLESCENT; AGING; BICUSPID; BIOMECHANICS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MAXILLA; MIDDLE AGED; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TOOTH FRACTURES; TOOTH ROOT; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84861602913     PISSN: 07340664     EISSN: 17412358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2011.00583.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Xu HH, Smith DT, Jahanmir S, et al., Indentation damage and mechanical properties of human enamel and dentin. J Dent Res 1998; 77: 472-480.
2. Berkovitz BKB, Holland GR, Moxham BJ,. A Color Atlas & Textbook of Oral Anatomy. London: Wolfe Medical Publications Ltda, 1978.
3. Fearnhead RW, Kawasaki K, Inoue K,. Comments on the porosity of human tooth enamel. J Dent Res 1982; 61: 1524-1530.
4. Zheng J, Zhou ZR,. Effect of age on the friction and wear behaviors of human teeth. Tribol Int 2006; 39: 266-273.
5. Attin T, Koidl U, Buchalla W, et al., Correlation of microhardness and wear in differently erosed bovine dental enamel. Arch Oral Biol 1997; 42: 243-250.
6. Meredith N, Sherriff M, Setchell DJ, et al., Measurement of the microhardness and Young's modulus of human enamel and dentine using an indentation technique. Arch Oral Biol 1996; 41: 539-545.
7. Mahoney E, Holt A, Swain M, et al., The hardness and modulus of elasticity of primary molar teeth: an ultra-micro-indentation study. J Dent 2000; 28: 589-594.
8. Pioch T, Staehle HJ,. Experimental investigation of the shear strengths of teeth in the region of the dentinoenamel junction. Quintessence Int 1996; 27: 711-714.
9. Rasmussen ST,. Fracture properties of human teeth in proximity to the Dentinoenamel Junction. J Dent Res 1984; 63: 1279-1283.
10. Takahashi CU, De Cara AA, Contin I,. Resistência à fratura de restauraçes diretas com cobertura de cúspide em pré-molares superiores endodonticamente tratados. Pesqui Odontol Bras 2001; 15: 247-251.
11. Blitz N, Serota KS,. Exploding the myths, defining the future. Oral Health 1985; 85: 19-24.
12. Burke FJT,. Tooth fracture in vivo and in vitro. J Dent 1992; 20: 131-139.
13. Hansen EK, Asmussen E, Christiansen NC,. In vivo fractures of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with amalgam. Endod Dent Traumatol 1990; 6: 49-55.
14. Linn J, Messer HH,. Effect of restorative procedures on the strength of endodontically treated molars. J Endod 1994; 20: 479-489.
15. Dean JP, Jeansonne BG, Sarkar N,. In vitro evaluation of carbon fiber post. J Endod 1998; 24: 807-810.
16. Fredriksson M, Astbäck J, Pamenius M, et al., A retrospective study of 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiber reinforced epoxy resin posts. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 151-157.
17. Freedman GA,. Esthetic post-and-core treatment. Dent Clin North Am 2001; 45: 103-116.
18. Guzy GE, Nicholls JI,. In vitro comparison of intact endodontically treated teeth with and without endo-post reinforcement. J Prosthet Dent 1979; 42: 39-44.
19. Love RM, Purton DG,. The effect of serrations on carbon fiber posts-retention within the root canal, core retention, and post rigidity. Int J Prosthodont 1996; 9: 484-488.
20. McDonald AV, King PA, Setchell DJ,. An in vitro study to compare impact fracture resistance of intact root-treated teeth. Int Endod J 1990; 23: 304-312.
21. Robbins JW,. Guidelines for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 1990; 120: 558-566.
22. Scotti R, Ferrari M,. Pinos de fibra. Consideraçes teóricas e aplicaçes clínicas. Tradução de Lavínia Bozzo Aguilar Porsíuncula. São Paulo: Artes Médicas, 2003.
23. Sirimai S, Riis DN, Morgano SM,. An in vitro study of fracture resistance and the incidence of vertical root fracture of pulpless teeth restores with six post-and-core systems. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 262-269.
24. Furlan GF, Morello J, Ribeiro FC,. Diagnóstico de fratura radicular vertical: revisão de literatura. Rev Bras Pesqui Saúde 2010; 12: 61-68.
25. Smales RJ,. Longevity of cusp-covered amalgams: survivals after 15 years. Oper Dent 1991; 16: 17-20.
26. Chan CP, Tseng SC, Lin CP, et al., Vertical root fracture in non endodontically treated teeth: a clinical report of 64 cases in chinese patients. J Endod 1998; 24: 678-681.
27. Soares CJ, Martins LR, Pfeifer JM, et al., Fracture resistance of teeth restored with indirect-composite and ceramic inlay systems. Quintessence Int 2004; 35: 281-286.
28. Metzler KT, Woody RD, Miller AW III, et al., In vitro investigation of the wear of human enamel by dental porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 356-364.
29. Minto AMP, Dinelli W, Nonaka T, et al., Estudo comparativo da resistência à fratura de pré-molares superiores íntegros e restaurados com amálgama aderido. Pesqui Odontol Bras 2002; 16 n. 2: 121-126.
30. Cohen S, Berman LH, Blanco L, et al., A demographic analysis of vertical root fractures. J Endod 2006; 32: 1160-1163.
31. Peciuliene V, Rimkuviene J,. Vertical root fractures in endodontically treated teeth: a clinical survey. Stomatologija 2004; 6: 77-80.
32. Straioto FG, Neto AJF, Soares CJ, et al., Avaliação da topografia de superfície do esmalte dentário humano erupcionado em função da idade. Proceedings of the Annual SBPqO Meeting 2005; 22 (Suppl 19): 188.