The influence of patient and cohort parameters on the incidence and developmental potential of embryos with poor quality traits for use in human embryonic stem cell derivation

Human Reproduction

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1581-1589

  Oleary, T ^a   Duggal, G ^a   Lierman, S ^a   Van Den Abbeel, E ^a   Heindryckx, B ^a   De Sutter, P ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Blastocyst development; Embryo cohort parameters; Human embryonic stem cell derivation; Inner cell mass; Poor quality embryos

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLASTOCYST; CRYOPRESERVATION; EMBRYO; EMBRYO (ANATOMY); EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EMBRYO TRANSFER; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; INFERTILITY THERAPY; INNER CELL MASS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL AGE; OOCYTE; POOR QUALITY EMBRYO; PREGNANCY;

EID: 84861568493     PISSN: 02681161     EISSN: 14602350     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des040     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Alikani M, Calderon G, Tomkin G, Garrisi J, Kokot M, Cohen J. Cleavage anomalies in early human embryos and survival after prolonged culture in-vitro. Hum Reprod 2000;15:2634-2643.
2. Alikani M, Munne S. Nonviable human pre-implantation embryos as a source of stem cells for research and potential therapy. Stem Cell Rev 2005;1:337-343.
3. Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine and ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology. The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Hum Reprod 2011; 26:1270-1283.
4. Balakier H, Cadesky K. The frequency and developmental capability of human embryos containing multinucleated blastomeres. Hum Reprod 1997;12:800-804.
5. Banerjee P, Choi B, Shahine LK, Jun SH, O'Leary K, Lathi RB, Westphal LM, Wong WH, Yao MW. Deep phenotyping to predict live birth outcomes in in vitro fertilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107:13570-13575.
6. Bjuresten K, Hovatta O. Donation of embryos for stem cell research-how many couples consent? Hum Reprod 2003;18:1353-1355.
7. Broekmans FJ, Knauff EA, te Velde ER, Macklon NS, Fauser BC. Female reproductive ageing: current knowledge and future trends. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2007;18:58-65.
8. Cai QF, Wan F, Huang R, Zhang HW. Factors predicting the cumulative outcome of IVF/ICSI treatment: a multivariable analysis of 2450 patients. Hum Reprod 2011;26:2532-2540.
9. Candan ZN, Kahraman S. Establishment and characterization of human embryonic stem cell lines, Turkey perspectives. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 2010;46:345-355.
10. Chen H, Qian K, Hu J, Liu D, Lu W, Yang Y, Wang D, Yan H, Zhang S, Zhu G. The derivation of two additional human embryonic stem cell lines from day 3 embryos with low morphological scores. Hum Reprod 2005;20:2201-2206.
11. Cortes JL, Cobo F, Barnie AH, Catalina P, Cabrera C, Nieto A, Montes R, Concha A. Role of the embryology laboratory in the human embryonic stem cell line derivation process. Cytotechnology 2006;52:1-11.
12. Cortes JL, Sanchez L, Ligero G, Gutierrez-Aranda I, Catalina P, Elosua C, Leone PE, Montes R, Bueno C, Ramos-Mejia V et al. Mesenchymal stem cells facilitate the derivation of human embryonic stem cells from cryopreserved poor-quality embryos. Hum Reprod 2009;24:1844-1851.
13. Della Ragione T, Verheyen G, Papanikolaoa EG, Van Landuyt L, Devroey P, Van Stierteghem A. Developmental stage on day-5 and fragmentation rate on day-3 can influence the implantation potential of top quality blastocysts in IVF cycles with single embryo transfer. Repod Biol Endocrinol 2007;5:2.
14. Ebner T, Yaman C, Moser M, Sommergruber M, PolzW, Tews G. Embryo fragmentation in vitro and its impact on treatment and pregnancy outcome. Fertil Steril 2001;76:281-285.
15. Ebner T, Moser M, Sommergruber M, Tews G. Selection based on morphological assessment of oocytes and embryos at different stages of preimplantation development: a review. Hum Reprod Update 2003; 9:251-262.
16. Findikli N, Kahraman S, Akcin O, Sertyel S, Candan Z. Establishment and characterization of new human embryonic stem cell lines. Reprod Biomed Online 2005;10:617-627.
17. Genbacev O, Krtolica A, Zdravkovic T, Brunette E, Powell S, Nath A, Caceres E, McMaster M, McDonagh S, Li Y et al. Serum-free derivation of human embryonic stem cell lines on human placental fibroblast feeders. Fertil Steril 2005;83:1517-1529.
18. Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Ferraretti AP, Lappi M, Borghi E, Ermini B. Oocyte euploidy, pronuclear zygote morphology and embryo chromosomal complement. Hum Reprod 2007;22:241-249.
19. Guerif F, Frapsauce C, Chavez C, Cadoret V, Royere D. Treating women under 36 years old without top-quality embryos on day 2: a prospective study comparing double embryo transfer with single blastocyst transfer. Hum Reprod 2011;26:775-781.
20. Hardarson T, Hanson C, Sjogren A, Lundin K. Human embryos with unevenly sized blastomeres have lower pregnancy and implantation rates: indications for aneuploidy and multinucleation. Hum Reprod 2001;16:313-318.
21. Hardarson T, Caisander G, Sjogren A, Hanson C, Hamberger L, Lundin K. A morphological and chromosomal study of blastocysts developing from morphologically suboptimal human pre-embryos compared with control blastocysts. Hum Reprod 2003;18:399-407.
22. Hardy K, Handyside AH, Winston RM. The human blastocyst: cell number, death and allocation during late preimplantation development in vitro. Development 1989;107:597-604.
23. Harkness L, Rasmussen IA, Erb K, Kassem M. Derivation and characterisation of hESC lines from supernumerary embryos, experience from Odense, Denmark. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 2010; 46:259-268.
24. Hovatta O, Mikkola M, Gertow K, Stromberg AM, Inzunza J, Hreinsson J, Rozell B, Blennow E, Andang M, Ahrlund-Richter L. A culture system using human foreskin fibroblasts as feeder cells allows production of human embryonic stem cells. Hum Reprod 2003;18:1404-1409.
25. Huan Q, Gao X, Wang Y, Shen Y, Ma W, Chen ZJ. Comparative evaluation of human embryonic stem cell lines derived from zygotes with normal and abnormal pronuclei. Dev Dyn 2010;239:425-438.
26. Hug K. Motivation to donate or not donate surplus embryos for stem-cell research: literature review. Fertil Steril 2008;89:263-277.
27. Jackson KV, Ginsburg ES, Hornstein MD, Rein MS, Clarke RN. Multinucleation in normally fertilized embryos is associated with an accelerated ovulation induction response and lower implantation and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril 1998;70:60-66.
28. Jain T, Missmer SA. Support for embryonic stem cell research among infertility patients. Fertil Steril 2008;90:506-512.
29. Jun SH, Choi B, Shahine L, Westphal LM, Behr B, Reijo Pera RA, Wong WH, Yao MW. Defining human embryo phenotypes by cohort-specific prognostic factors. PLoS ONE 2008;3:e2562.
30. Lerou PH, Yabuuchi A, Huo H, Takeuchi A, Shea J, Cimini T, Ince TA, Ginsburg E, Racowsky C, Daley GQ. Human embryonic stem cell derivation from poor-quality embryos. Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26:212-214.
31. Lewin A, Schenker JG, Safran A, Zigelman N, Avrech O, Abramov Y, Friedler S, Reubinoff BE. Embryo growth rate in vitro as an indicator of embryo quality in IVF cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet 1994;11:500-503.
32. Liu W, Yin Y, Long X, Luo Y, Jiang Y, Zhang W, Du H, Li S, Zheng Y, Li Q et al. Derivation and characterization of human embryonic stem cell lines from poor quality embryos. J Genet Genomics 2009;36:229-239.
33. Lysdahl H, Gabrielsen A, Minger SL, Patel MJ, Fink T, Petersen K, Ebbesen P, Zachar V. Derivation and characterization of four new human embryonic stem cell lines: the Danish experience. Reprod Biomed Online 2006;12:119-126.
34. Magli MC, Gianaroli L, Ferraretti AP, Lappi M, Ruberti A, Farfalli V. Embryo morphology and development are dependent on the chromosomal complement. Fertil Steril 2007;87:534-541.
35. Marquez C, Sandalinas M, Bahce M, Alikani M, Munne S. Chromosome abnormalities in 1255 cleavage-stage human embryos. Reprod Biomed Online 2000;1:17-26.
36. Meniru GI, Craft IL. Utilization of retrieved oocytes as an index of the efficiency of superovulation strategies for in-vitro fertilization treatment. Hum Reprod 1997;12:2129-232.
37. Mitalipova M, Calhoun J, Shin S, Wininger D, Schulz T, Noggle S, Venable A, Lyons I, Robins A, Stice S. Human embryonic stem cell lines derived from discarded embryos. Stem Cells 2003;21:521-526.
38. O'Leary T, Heindryckx B, Lierman S, Van der Jeught M, Menten B, Deforce D, Cornelissen R, de Sousa Lopes SC, De Sutter P. The influence of early embryo traits on human embryonic stem cell derivation efficiency. Stem Cells Dev 2011;20:785-793.
39. Patrizio P, Sakkas D. From oocyte to baby: a clinical evaluation of the biological efficiency of in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2009; 91:1061-1066.
40. Racowsky C. High rates of embryonic loss, yet high incidence of multiple births in human ART: is this paradoxical? Theriogenology 2002; 57:87-96.
41. Racowsky C, Combelles CM, Nureddin A, Pan Y, Finn A, Miles L, Gale S, O'Leary T, Jackson KV. Day 3 and day 5 morphological predictors of embryo viability. Reprod Biomed Online 2003;6:323-331.
42. Raya A, Rodriguez-Piza I, Aran B, Consiglio A, Barri PN, Veiga A, Izpisua Belmonte JC. Generation of cardiomyocytes from new human embryonic stem cell lines derived from poor-quality blastocysts. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 2008;73:127-135.
43. Rosenbusch BE. Mechanisms giving rise to triploid zygotes during assisted reproduction. Fertil Steril 2008;90:49-55.
44. Scott L, Finn A, O'Leary T, McLellan S, Hill J. Morphologic parameters of early cleavage-stage embryos that correlate with fetal development and delivery: prospective and applied data for increased pregnancy rates. Hum Reprod 2007;22:230-240.
45. Shoukir Y, Chardonnens D, Campana A, Sakkas D. Blastocyst development from supernumerary embryos after intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a paternal influence? Hum Reprod 1998;13:1632-1637.
46. Skottman H. Derivation and characterization of three new human embryonic stem cell lines in Finland. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 2010; 46:206-209.
47. Solé M, Santalo J, Rodriguez I, Boada M, Coroleu B, Barri PN, Veiga A. Correlation between embryo factors and pregnancy rate: Development of an embryo score in a cryopreservation program. J Assist Reprod Genet 2011;28:129-136.
48. Stephenson EL, Braude PR, Mason C. International community consensus standard for reporting derivation of human embryonic stem cell lines. Regen Med 2007;2:349-362.
49. Stone BA, Greene J, Vargyas JM, Ringler GE, Marrs RP. Embryo fragmentation as a determinant of blastocyst development in vitro and pregnancy outcomes following embryo transfer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:2014-2049; discussion 19-20.
50. Strom S, Rodriguez-Wallberg K, Holm F, Bergstrom R, Eklund L, Stromberg AM, Hovatta O. No relationship between embryo morphology and successful derivation of human embryonic stem cell lines. PLoS ONE 2010;5:e15329.
51. Thum MY, Wells V, Abdalla H. Patient selection criteria for blastocyst culture in IVF/ICSI treatment. J Assist Reprod Genet 2010;27:555-560.
52. van Loendersloot LL, van Wely M, Limpens J, Bossuyt PM, Repping S, van der Veen F. Predictive factors in in vitro fertilization (IVF): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2010;16:577-589.
53. Van Royen E, Mangelschots K, De Neubourg D, Valkenburg M, Van de Meerssche M, Ryckaert G, Eestermans W, Gerris J. Characterization of a top quality embryo, a step towards single-embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 1999;14:2345-2349.
54. Van Royen E, Mangelschots K, Vercruyssen M, De Neubourg D, Valkenburg M, Ryckaert G, Gerris J. Multinucleation in cleavage stage embryos. Hum Reprod 2003;18:1062-1069.
55. Venu P, Chakraborty S, Inamdar MS. Analysis of long-term culture properties and pluripotent character of two sibling human embryonic stem cell lines derived from discarded embryos. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 2010;46:200-205.
56. Willis MY, Browne AS, Session DR, Spencer JB. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: a review for the non-ART patient. Minerva Ginecologica 2011;63:119-135.
57. Zhang X, Stojkovic P, Przyborski S, Cooke M, Armstrong L, Lako M, Stojkovic M. Derivation of human embryonic stem cells from developing and arrested embryos. Stem Cells 2006;24:2669-2676.
58. Ziebe S, Petersen K, Lindenberg S, Andersen AG, Gabrielsen A, Andersen AN. Embryo morphology or cleavage stage: how to select the best embryos for transfer after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1997;12:1545-1549.