Hemispheric specialization for movement control produces dissociable differences in online corrections after stroke

Cerebral Cortex

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1407-1419

  Schaefer, Sydney Y ^a   Mutha, Pratik K ^b,c   Haaland, Kathleen Y ^b,d,e   Sainburg, Robert L ^c,e  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NEW MEXICO VA HEALTH CARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^c PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e PENN STATE COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

lateralization; motor control; reaching; stroke

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MOVEMENT; BRAIN INJURY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; JUMPING; MALE; MOTOR COORDINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STROKE; STROKE PATIENT;

ADULT; AGED; DOMINANCE, CEREBRAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; STROKE;

EID: 84861565985     PISSN: 10473211     EISSN: 14602199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhr237     Document Type: Article

References (108)

1. Alexander GE, Crutcher MD. 1990. Preparation for movement: neural representations of intended direction in three motor areas of the monkey. J Neurophysiol. 64:133-150.
2. Allred RP, Jones TA. 2004. Unilateral ischemic sensorimotor cortical damage in female rats: forelimb behavioral effects and dendritic structural plasticity in the contralateral homotopic cortex. Exp Neurol. 190:433-445.
3. Arce F, Novick I, Shahar M, Link Y, Ghez C, Vaadia E. 2009. Differences in context and feedback result in different trajectories and adaptation strategies in reaching. PLoS One. 4:e4214.
4. Arce F, Novick I, Vaadia E. 2010. Discordant tasks and motor adjustments affect interactions between adaptations to altered kinematics and dynamics. Front Hum Neurosci. 3:65.
5. Aron AR, Poldrack RA. 2006. Cortical and subcortical contributions to stop signal response inhibition: role of the subthalamic nucleus. J Neurosci. 26:2424-2433.
6. Bagesteiro LB, Sainburg RL. 2002. Handedness: dominant arm advantages in control of limb dynamics. J Neurophysiol. 88:2408-2421.
7. Bagesteiro LB, Sainburg RL. 2003. Nondominant arm advantages in load compensation during rapid elbow joint movements. J Neurophysiol. 90:1503-1513.
8. Beer RF, Dewald JP, Dawson ML, Rymer WZ. 2004. Target-dependent differences between free and constrained arm movements in chronic hemiparesis. Exp Brain Res. 156:458-470.
9. Beer RF, Dewald JP, Rymer WZ. 2000. Deficits in the coordination of multijoint arm movements in patients with hemiparesis: evidence for disturbed control of limb dynamics. Exp Brain Res. 131:305-319.
10. Bourbonnais D, Vanden Noven S, Carey KM, Rymer WZ. 1989. Abnormal spatial patterns of elbow muscle activation in hemiparetic human subjects. Brain. 112:85-102.
11. Bury SD, Jones TA. 2002. Unilateral sensorimotor cortex lesions in adult rats facilitate motor skill learning with the "unaffected" forelimb and training-induced dendritic structural plasticity in the motor cortex. J Neurosci. 22:8597-8606.
12. Chestnut C, Haaland KY. 2008. Functional significance of ipsilesional motor deficits after unilateral stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 89:62-68.
13. Cramer SC, Nelles G, Benson RR, Kaplan JD, Parker RA, Kwong KK, Kennedy DN, Finklestein SP, Rosen BR. 1997. A functional MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparetic stroke. Stroke. 28:2518-2527.
14. Darling WG, Bartelt R, Pizzimenti MA, Rizzo M. 2008. Spatial perception errors do not predict pointing errors by individuals with brain lesions. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 30:102-119.
15. Darling WG, Pizzimenti MA, Hynes SM, Rotella DL, Headley G, Ge J, Stilwell-Morecraft KS, McNeal DW, Solon-Cline KM, Morecraft RJ. 2011. Volumetric effects of motor cortex injury on recovery of ipsilesional dexterous movements. Exp Neurol. 231:56-71.
16. DeArmond SJ, Fusco MM, Dewey MM. 1989. Structure of the human brain: a photographic atlas. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Desmurget M, Epstein CM, Turner RS, Prablanc C, Alexander GE, Grafton ST. 1999. Role of the posterior parietal cortex in updating reaching movements to a visual target. Nat Neurosci. 2: 563-567.
18. Desmurget M, Pelisson D, Rossetti Y, Prablanc C. 1998. From eye to hand: planning goal-directed movements. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 22:761-788.
19. Desrosiers J, Bourbonnais D, Bravo G, Roy PM, Guay M. 1996. Performance of the 'unaffected' upper extremity of elderly stroke patients. Stroke. 27:1564-1570.
20. Dewald JP, Beer RF. 2001. Abnormal joint torque patterns in the paretic upper limb of subjects with hemiparesis. Muscle Nerve. 24:273-283.
21. Dewald JP, Pope PS, Given JD, Buchanan TS, Rymer WZ. 1995. Abnormal muscle coactivation patterns during isometric torque generation at the elbow and shoulder in hemiparetic subjects. Brain. 118:495-510.
22. Dizio P, Lackner JR. 1995. Motor adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of reaching movements: endpoint but not trajectory adaptation transfers to the nonexposed arm. J Neurophysiol. 74:1787-1792.
23. Duff SV, Sainburg RL. 2007. Lateralization of motor adaptation reveals independence in control of trajectory and steady-state position. Exp Brain Res. 179:551-561.
24. Elbert T, Rockstroh B. 2004. Reorganization of human cerebral cortex: the range of changes following use and injury. Neuroscientist. 10:129-141.
25. Fang Y, Yue GH, Hrovat K, Sahgal V, Daly JJ. 2007. Abnormal cognitive planning and movement smoothness control for a complex shoulder/elbow motor task in stroke survivors. J Neurol Sci. 256:21-29.
26. Fine MS, Thoroughman KA. 2007. Trial-by-trial transformation of error into sensorimotor adaptation changes with environmental dynamics. J Neurophysiol. 98:1392-1404.
27. Fisk JD, Goodale MA. 1988. The effects of unilateral brain damage on visually guided reaching: hemispheric differences in the nature of the deficit. Exp Brain Res. 72:425-435.
28. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. 1975. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 7:13-31.
29. Gazzaniga MS. 2000. Cerebral specialization and interhemispheric communication: does the corpus callosum enable the human condition? Brain. 123(Pt 7):1293-1326.
30. Gazzaniga MS. 2005. Forty-five years of split-brain research and still going strong. Nat Rev Neurosci. 6:653-659.
31. Ghez C, Scheidt R, Heijink H. 2007. Different learned coordinate frames for planning trajectories and final positions in reaching. J Neuro-physiol. 98:3614-3626.
32. Goble DJ, Brown SH. 2007. Task-dependent asymmetries in the utilization of proprioceptive feedback for goal-directed movement. Exp Brain Res. 180:693-704.
33. Goble DJ, Lewis CA, Brown SH. 2006. Upper limb asymmetries in the utilization of proprioceptive feedback. Exp Brain Res. 168:307-311.
34. Goodale MA, Pelisson D, Prablanc C. 1986. Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement. Nature. 320:748-750.
35. Gordon J, Ghilardi MF, Cooper SE, Ghez C. 1994. Accuracy of planar reaching movements. II. Systematic extent errors resulting from inertial anisotropy. Exp Brain Res. 99:112-130.
36. Gordon J, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C. 1994. Accuracy of planar reaching movements. I. Independence of direction and extent variability. Exp Brain Res. 99:97-111.
37. Gritsenko V, Yakovenko S, Kalaska JF. 2009. Integration of predictive feedforward and sensory feedback signals for online control of visually guided movement. J Neurophysiol. 102:914-930.
38. Guiard Y, Diaz G, Beaubaton D. 1983. Left-hand advantage in righthanders for spatial constant error: preliminary evidence in a unimanual ballistic aimed movement. Neuropsychologia. 21:111-115.
39. Haaland KY, Harrington DL. 1989. Hemispheric control of the initial and corrective components of aiming movements. Neuropsycholo-gia. 27:961-969.
40. Haaland KY, Prestopnik JL, Knight RT, Lee RR. 2004. Hemispheric asymmetries for kinematic and positional aspects of reaching. Brain. 127:1145-1158.
41. Harrington DL, Haaland KY. 1991. Hemispheric specialization for motor sequencing: abnormalities in levels of programming. Neuropsycho-logia. 29:147-163.
42. Heaton RK, Miller SW, Taylor MJ, Grant I. 2004. Revised comprehensive norms for an expanded Halstead-Reitan battery: demographically adjusted neuropsychological norms for African American and Caucasian adults. Lutz (FL): Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
43. Hermsdorfer J, Blankenfeld H, Goldenberg G. 2003. The dependence of ipsilesional aiming deficits on task demands, lesioned hemisphere, and apraxia. Neuropsychologia. 41:1628-1643.
44. Hermsdorfer J, Laimgruber K, Kerkhoff G, Mai N, Goldenberg G. 1999. Effects of unilateral brain damage on grip selection, coordination, and kinematics of ipsilesional prehension. Exp Brain Res. 128:41-51.
45. Hochman EY, Eviatar Z, Barnea A, Zaaroor M, Zaidel E. 2011. Hemispheric integration is critical for intact error processing. Neuropsychologia. 49:1816-1823.
46. Hsu JE, Jones TA. 2006. Contralesional neural plasticity and functional changes in the less-affected forelimb after large and small cortical infarcts in rats. Exp Neurol. 201:479-494.
47. Humphry GM. 1861. The human foot and the human hand. London: MacMillan and Co.
48. Kaeser M, Wyss AF, Bashir S, Hamadjida A, Liu Y, Bloch J, Brunet JF, Belhaj-Saif A, Rouiller EM. 2010. Effects of unilateral motor cortex lesion on ipsilesional hand's reach and grasp performance in monkeys: relationship with recovery in the contralesional hand. J Neurophysiol. 103:1630-1645.
49. Keele SW, Posner MI. 1968. Processing of visual feedback in rapid movements. J Exp Psychol. 77:155-158.
50. Kertesz A. 1982. Western aphasia battery. New York: The Psychological Corporation.
51. Kimura D, Archibald Y. 1974. Motor functions of the left hemisphere. Brain. 97:337-350.
52. Knight RT, Scabini D, Woods DL, Clayworth C. 1988. The effects of lesions of superior temporal gyrus and inferior parietal lobe on temporal and vertex components of the human AEP. Electro-encephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 70:499-509.
53. Kurtzer I, Herter TM, Scott SH. 2005. Random change in cortical load representation suggests distinct control of posture and movement. Nat Neurosci. 8:498-504.
54. Lang CE, Wagner JM, Edwards DF, Dromerick AW. 2007. Upper extremity use in people with hemiparesis in the first few weeks after stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 31:56-63.
55. Lenhard A, Hoffmann J. 2007. Constant error in aiming movements without visual feedback is higher in the preferred hand. Laterality. 12:227-238.
56. Levin MF. 1996. Interjoint coordination during pointing movements is disrupted in spastic hemiparesis. Brain. 119:281-293.
57. Luft AR, Waller S, Forrester L, Smith GV, Whitall J, Macko RF, Schulz JB, Hanley DF. 2004. Lesion location alters brain activation in chronically impaired stroke survivors. Neuroimage. 21:924-935.
58. Luke LM, Allred RP, Jones TA. 2004. Unilateral ischemic sensorimotor cortical damage induces contralesional synaptogenesis and enhances skilled reaching with the ipsilateral forelimb in adult male rats. Synapse. 54:187-199.
59. Mars RB, Piekema C, Coles MG, Hulstijn W, Toni I. 2007. On the programming and reprogramming of actions. Cereb Cortex. 17:2972-2979.
60. Mutha PK, Boulinguez P, Sainburg RL. 2008. Visual modulation of proprioceptive reflexes during movement. Brain Res. 1246:54-69.
61. Mutha PK, Sainburg RL. 2007. Control of velocity and position in single joint movements. Hum Mov Sci. 26:808-823.
62. Mutha PK, Sainburg RL, Haaland KY. 2010. Coordination deficits in ideomotor apraxia during visually targeted reaching reflect impaired visuomotor transformations. Neuropsychologia. 48: 3855-3867.
63. Mutha PK, Sainburg RL, Haaland KY. 2011. Left parietal regions are critical for adaptive visuomotor control. J Neurosci. 31:6972-6981.
64. Nakamura RK, Gazzaniga MS. 1978. Hemispherectomy vs commissur-otomy in the monkey: one hemisphere can be better than two. Exp Neurol. 59:202-208.
65. Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. 1994. Compensation in recovery of upper extremity function after stroke: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 75:852-857.
66. Neubert FX, Mars RB, Buch ER, Olivier E, Rushworth MF. 2010. Cortical and subcortical interactions during action reprogramming and their related white matter pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 107:13240-13245.
67. Nonnekes JH, Talelli P, de Niet M, Reynolds RF, Weerdesteyn V, Day BL. 2010. Deficits underlying impaired visually triggered step adjustments in mildly affected stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 24:393-400.
68. Nowak DA, Grefkes C, Dafotakis M, Kust J, Karbe H, Fink GR. 2007. Dexterity is impaired at both hands following unilateral subcortical middle cerebral artery stroke. Eur J Neurosci. 25:3173-3184.
69. Oldfield RC. 1971. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 9:97-113.
70. Oliveira FT, Diedrichsen J, Verstynen T, Duque J, Ivry RB. 2010. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of posterior parietal cortex affects decisions of hand choice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 107: 17751-17756.
71. Prablanc C, Martin O. 1992. Automatic control during hand reaching at undetected two-dimensional target displacements. J Neurophysiol. 67:455-469.
72. Quaney BM, He J, Timberlake G, Dodd K, Carr C. 2010. Visuomotor training improves stroke-related ipsilesional upper extremity impairments. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 24:52-61.
73. Quaney BM, Perera S, Maletsky R, Luchies CW, Nudo RJ. 2005. Impaired grip force modulation in the ipsilesional hand after unilateral middle cerebral artery stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 19:338-349.
74. Rinehart JK, Singleton RD, Adair JC, Sadek JR, Haaland KY. 2009. Arm use after left or right hemiparesis is influenced by hand preference. Stroke. 40:545-550.
75. Roy EA, MacKenzie C. 1978. Handedness effects in kinesthetic spatial location judgements. Cortex. 14:250-258.
76. Rudroff T, Justice JN, Holmes MR, Matthews SD, Enoka RM. 2011. Muscle activity and time to task failure differ with load compliance and target force for elbow flexor muscles. J Appl Physiol. 110:125-136.
77. Sainburg RL. 2002. Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness. Exp Brain Res. 142:241-258.
78. Sainburg RL. 2005. Handedness: differential specializations for control of trajectory and position. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 33:206-213.
79. Sainburg RL. 2010. Lateralization of goal-directed movement. In: Elliott D, Khan M, editors. Vision and goal-directed movement: neuro-behavioral perspectives. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics. p. 219-238.
80. Sainburg RL, Kalakanis D. 2000. Differences in control of limb dynamics during dominant and nondominant arm reaching. J Neurophysiol. 83:2661-2675.
81. Sainburg RL, Lateiner JE, Latash ML, Bagesteiro LB. 2003. Effects of altering initial position on movement direction and extent. J Neurophysiol. 89:401-415.
82. Sarlegna F, Blouin J, Bresciani JP, Bourdin C, Vercher JL, Gauthier GM. 2003. Target and hand position information in the online control of goal-directed arm movements. Exp Brain Res. 151:524-535.
83. Sarlegna FR, Przybyla A, Sainburg RL. 2009. The influence of target sensory modality on motor planning may reflect errors in sensori-motor transformations. Neuroscience. 164:597-610.
84. Schabowsky CN, Hidler JM, Lum PS. 2007. Greater reliance on impedance control in the nondominant arm compared with the dominant arm when adapting to a novel dynamic environment. Exp Brain Res. 182:567-577.
85. Schaechter JD, Moore CI, Connell BD, Rosen BR, Dijkhuizen RM. 2006. Structural and functional plasticity in the somatosensory cortex of chronic stroke patients. Brain. 129:2722-2733.
86. Schaefer SY, Haaland KY, Sainburg RL. 2007. Ipsilesional motor deficits following stroke reflect hemispheric specializations for movement control. Brain. 130:2146-2158.
87. Schaefer SY, Haaland KY, Sainburg RL. 2009a. Dissociation of initial trajectory and final position errors during visuomotor adaptation following unilateral stroke. Brain Res. 1298:78-91.
88. Schaefer SY, Haaland KY, Sainburg RL. 2009b. Hemispheric specialization and functional impact of ipsilesional deficits in movement coordination and accuracy. Neuropsychologia. 47:2953-2966.
89. Shabbott BA, Sainburg RL. 2008. Differentiating between two models of motor lateralization. J Neurophysiol. 100:565-575.
90. Shabbott BA, Sainburg RL. 2009. On-line corrections for visuomotor errors. Exp Brain Res. 195:59-72.
91. Shadmehr R, Krakauer JW. 2008. A computational neuroanatomy for motor control. Exp Brain Res. 185:359-381.
92. Sober SJ, Sabes PN. 2003. Multisensory integration during motor planning. J Neurosci. 23:6982-6992.
93. Soechting JF, Lacquaniti F. 1983. Modification of trajectory of a pointing movement in response to a change in target location. J Neuro-physiol. 49:548-564.
94. Sterr A, Freivogel S, Schmalohr D. 2002. Neurobehavioral aspects of recovery: assessment of the learned nonuse phenomenon in hemiparetic adolescents. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 83:1726-1731.
95. Swann N, Tandon N, Canolty R, Ellmore TM, MCEvoy LK, Dreyer S, SiSano M, Aron AR. 2009. Intracranial EEG reveals a time-and frequency-specific role for the right inferior frontal gyrus and primary motor cortex in stopping initiated responses. J Neurosci. 29:12675-12685.
96. Taub E, Uswatte G, Mark VW, Morris DM. 2006. The learned nonuse phenomenon: implications for rehabilitation. Eura Medicophys. 42:241-256.
97. Thrane G, Emaus N, Askim T, Anke A. 2011. Arm use in patients with subacute stroke monitored by accelerometry: association with motor impairment and influence on self-dependence. J Rehabil Med. 43:299-304.
98. Tobler PN, Christopoulos GI, O'Doherty JP, Dolan RJ, Schultz W. 2009. Risk-dependent reward value signal in human prefrontal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 106:7185-7190.
99. Trommershauser J, Landy MS, Maloney LT. 2006. Humans rapidly estimate expected gain in movement planning. Psychol Sci. 17:981-988.
100. Turner RS, Desmurget M. 2010. Basal ganglia contributions to motor control: a vigorous tutor. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 20:704-716.
101. Uswatte G, Foo WL, Olmstead H, Lopez K, Holand A, Simms LB. 2005. Ambulatory monitoring of arm movement using accelerometry: an objective measure of upper-extremity rehabilitation in persons with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 86:1498-1501.
102. Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Light K, Thompson PA. 2006. The Motor Activity Log-28: assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology. 67:1189-1194.
103. van Beers RJ, Baraduc P, Wolpert DM. 2002. Role of uncertainty in motor control. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 357:1137-1145.
104. Wang J, Sainburg RL. 2005. Adaptation to visuomotor rotations remaps movement vectors, not final positions. J Neurosci. 25:4024-4030.
105. Wetter S, Poole JL, Haaland KY. 2005. Functional implications of ipsilesional motor deficits after unilateral stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 86:776-781.
106. Winstein CJ, Pohl PS. 1995. Effects of unilateral brain damage on the control of goal-directed hand movements. Exp Brain Res. 105:163-174.
107. Winter DA. 1990. Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
108. Yarosh CA, Hoffman DS, Strick PL. 2004. Deficits in movements of the wrist ipsilateral to a stroke in hemiparetic subjects. J Neurophysiol. 92:3276-3285.