Studying the impact of ubiquitous monitoring technology on office worker behaviours: The value of sharing research data

2012 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, PERCOM Workshops 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 902-907

  Moran, Stuart ^a   De Vallejo, Irene Lopez ^b   Nakata, Keiichi ^a   Conroy Dalton, Ruth ^c   Luck, Rachael ^d   McLennan, Peter ^b   Hailes, Steve ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

^b IK4 TEKNIKER   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

data sharing; location data; mixed methods; modelling; monitoring; pervasive; spatial; ubiquitous

Indexed keywords

DATA SHARING; LOCATION DATA; MIXED METHOD; MODELLING; PERVASIVE; SPATIAL; UBIQUITOUS;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; MONITORING; OFFICE BUILDINGS; RESEARCH; TECHNOLOGY;

UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING;

EID: 84861544427     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/PerComW.2012.6197642     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. I. L. d. Vallejo, "Measuring spatial and temporal features of physical interaction dynamics in the workplace," Doctor of Philosophy, The Faculty of the Built Environment, The Barlett, University College London, London, 2010.
2. S. Dawson, et al., "Watching Learning From Behind Closed Doors: The Impact of Surveillance on Student Online Behaviour," presented at the ELearn 2005: World conference on E-learning in corporate, government, healthcare and higher education, Vancouver, Canada, 2005.
3. M. Vorvoreanu and C. H. Botan, "Examining Electronic Surveillance In The Workplace: A Review Of Theoretical Perspectives And Research Findings," presented at the the Conference of the International Communication Association, Acapulco, Mexico, 2000.
4. D. Zweig, "Beyond Privacy and Fairness Concerns: Examining Psychological Boundary Violations as a Consequence of Electronic Performance Monitoring," in Electronic Monitoring in the Workplace: Controversies and Solutions, J. Weckert, Ed., ed Hershey: Idea Group Publishing, 2005, pp. 101-122.
5. G. R. Hayes, et al., "Physical, Social, and Experiential Knowledge in Pervasive Computing Environments," Pervasive Computing, vol. 6, pp. 56-63, 2007.
6. S. Moran and K. Nakata, "Analysing the Factors Affecting Users in Intelligent Pervasive Spaces," Intelligent Buildings International: Special Issue on Intelligent Pervasive Spaces for Working and Living vol. 2, pp. 57-71, 2010.
7. J. u. Bohn, et al., "Living in a World of Smart Everyday objects - Social, Economic and Ethical Implications," Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, vol. 10, pp. 763-785, 2007.
8. S. Moran, "User Perceptions of System Attributes in Ubiquitous Monitoring: Toward a Model of Behavioural Intention," School of Construction Management and Engineering, and Informatics Research Centre, University of Reading, Reading, 2011.
9. R. Bakeman and J. M. Gottman, Observing interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
10. D. E. Perry, et al., "Understanding and improving time usage in software development," Software Process, pp. 111-136, 1996.
11. T. v. Kasteren, et al., "Accurate activity recognition in a home setting," presented at the Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Ubiquitous computing, Seoul, Korea, 2008.
12. M. S. Ackerman, "Privacy in pervasive environments:next generation labeling protocols," Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, vol. 8, pp. 430-439, 2004.
13. J. C. Tang, et al., "Unobtrusive But Invasive: Using Screen Recording to Collect Field Data on Computer-Mediated Interaction," presented at the 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work table of contents, Banff, Alberta, Canada, 2006.
14. S. Spiekermann, User Control in Ubiquitous Computing: Design Alternatives and User Acceptance: Shaker, Aachen, 2008.
15. S. Konomi and G. Roussos, "Ubiquitous computing in the real world: lessons learnt from large scale RFID deployments," Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, vol. 11, pp. 507-521, 2007.
16. D. Zweig and J. Webster, "Where is the line between benign and invasive? An examination of psychological barriers to the acceptance of awareness monitoring systems," Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 23, pp. 605-633, 2002.
17. E. Guba and Y. Lincoln, "Competing paradigms in qualitative research," in in Handbook of Qualitative Research, ed: Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage, 1994, pp. 105-117.
18. K. Connelly, "On Developing a Technology Acceptance Model for Pervasive Computing," presented at the In the Proceedings of Ubiquitous System Evaluation (USE) - a workshop at the Ninth International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UBICOMP), 2007.
19. J. P. Spradley and D. W. McCurdy, The Cultural Experience: Ethnography in Complex Society Waveland Pr Inc., 1972.
20. J. P. Spradley, The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1979.
21. I. L. d. Vallejo, et al., "Location Tracking in an Office Environment: The Nationwide Case Study," in The Internet of Things: From RFID to the Next-Generation Pervasive Networked System, L. Yan, et al., Eds., ed: Auerbach Publications, 2008, pp. 233-255.
22. I. Ajzen, "The Theory of Planned Behavior," Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, vol. 50, pp. 179-211, 1991.
23. F. D. Davis, "Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology," MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, pp. 319-340, 1989.