Privacy in pervasive environments: Next generation labeling protocols

Personal and Ubiquitous Computing

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 430-439

  Ackerman, Mark S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Labeling protocols; P3P; Pervasive environments; Platform for privacy preferences; Privacy; Ubiquitous computing

Indexed keywords

DATA PRIVACY; UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING;

DATA REQUESTS; P3P; PERVASIVE ENVIRONMENTS; PLATFORM FOR PRIVACY PREFERENCES; PLATFORM FOR PRIVACY PREFERENCES PROJECTS; PRIVACY MECHANISMS;

INTERNET PROTOCOLS;

EID: 84900515472     PISSN: 16174909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00779-004-0305-8     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Culnan MJ (2000) Protecting privacy online: is self-regulation working? J Public Policy Market 19(1):20-26
2. Clarke R (1999) Introduction to dataveillance and information privacy, and definition of terms. Xamax Consultancy, Canberra, Australia, available at http://www.anu.edu.au/people/Roger.Clarke/DV/Intro.html
3. Fisher S (2001) Privacy by design. Info World 23(27):20-22
4. Harris Poll (2000) Online privacy: a growing threat. Business Week, March 2000, p 96
5. Culnan MJ, Armstrong PK (1999) Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness, and impersonal trust: an empirical investigation. Organ Sci 10(1):104-115
6. Davies SG (1997) Re-engineering the right to privacy: how privacy has been transformed from a right to a commodity. In: Agre PE, Rotenberg M (eds) Technology and privacy: the new landscape. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
7. Etzioni A (1999) The limits of privacy. Basic Books, New York
8. Goffman E (1961) The presentation of self in everyday life. Anchor-Doubleday, New York
9. Smith HJ, Milberg SJ, Burke SJ (1996) Information privacy: measuring individuals' concerns about organizational practices. MIS Quart 20(2):167-196
10. Westin AF (1991) Harris-Equifax consumer privacy survey 1991. Equifax Inc., Atlanta, Georgia
11. Ackerman MS, Cranor L, Reagle J (1999) Privacy in e-commerce: examining user scenarios and privacy preferences. In: Proceedings of ACM conference on electronic commerce (EC'99), Denver, Colorado, November 1999, pp 1-8
12. Spiekermann S, Grossklags J, Berendt B (2001) E-privacy in 2nd generation e-commerce: privacy preferences versus actual behavior. In: Proceedings of ACM conference on electronic commerce (EC 2001), Tampa, Florida, October 2001, pp 38-46
13. Dhillon GS, Moores TT (2001) Internet privacy: interpreting key issues. Inf Resources Manag J 14(4):33-37
14. Neuman WR, McKnight LW, Solomon RJ (1997) The Gordian knot: political gridlock on the information highway. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
15. Chaum D (1985) Security without identification: transaction systems to make big brother obsolete. Commun ACM 28(10):1030-1044
16. Reiter MK, Rubin AD (1999) Anonymous web transactions with crowds. Commun ACM 42(2):32-38
17. Goldschlag DM, Reed MG, Syverson PF (1999) Onion routing for anonymous and private internet connection. Commun ACM 42(2):39-41
18. Cranor LF (2003) Web privacy with P3P. O'Reilly, Cambridge, Massachusetts
19. Clarke R (2001) Of trustworthiness and pets: what lawyers haven't done for e-business. http://www.anu.edu.au/people/Roger.Clarke/EC/PacRimCL01.html
20. Priyantha NB, Chakraborty A, Balakrishnan H (2000) The cricket location-support system. In: Proceedings of 6th annual international conference on mobile computing and networking, Boston, Massachusetts, August 2000, pp 32-43
21. Hong J (2004) An architecture for privacy-sensitive ubiquitous computing. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on mobile systems, applications, and services (MobiSys 2004), Boston, Massachusetts, June 2004
22. Cranor L, Langheinrich M, Marchiori M, Presler-Marshall M, Reagle J (2002) The platform for privacy preferences 1.0 (P3P1.0) specification. MIT/World Wide Web Consortium, available at http://www.w3.org/TR/P3P/
23. Hockheiser H (2002) The platform for privacy preference as a social protocol: an examination within the US policy context. ACM Trans Internet Technol 2(4):276-306
24. Cranor L, Reagle J (1998) The platform for privacy preferences. Commun ACM 42(2):48-55
25. Ackerman MS (1997) General overview of the P3P architecture. World Wide Web Consortium, available at http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-P3P-arch.html
26. Ackerman MS, Cranor L (1999) Privacy critics: UI components to safeguard users' privacy. In: Proceedings of ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI'99), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, May 1999, pp 258-259
27. Langheinrich M (2002) A privacy awareness system for ubiquitous computing environments. In: Proceedings of the international conference ubiquitous computing (UbiComp 2002), Göteborg, Sweden, September/October 2002, available at http://www.inf.ethz.ch/-langhein
28. Byers S, Cranor LF, Kormann D (2003) Automated analysis of P3P-enabled web sites. In: Proceedings of 5th international conference on electronic commerce (ICEC 2003), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, May 2003, pp 326-338
29. Catlett J (2000) Open letter to P3P developers and replies. In: Proceedings of the 10th conference on computers, freedom and privacy: challenging the assumptions (CFP 2000), Toronto, Ontario, Canada, April 2000, pp 157-164
30. Cranor LF, Reagle J Jr (1998) Designing a social protocol: lessons learned from the Platform for Privacy Preferences. In: MacKie-Mason J, Waterman D (eds) Telephony, the internet, and the media. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey
31. Ackerman MS (2000) The intellectual challenge of CSCW: the gap between social requirements and technical feasibility. Hum Comput Interact 15(2-3):179-204
32. Ackerman MS (2001) The intellectual challenge of CSCW: the gap between social requirements and technical feasibility. In: Carroll JM (ed) Human-computer interaction in the new millennium. Addison-Wesley, New York