Factors influencing intracranial pressure monitoring guideline compliance and outcome after severe traumatic brain injury

Critical Care Medicine

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1914-1922

  Biersteker, Heleen A R ^a   Andriessen, Teuntje M J C ^a   Horn, Janneke ^b   Franschman, Gaby ^c   Van Der Naalt, Joukje ^d   Hoedemaekers, Cornelia W E ^a   Lingsma, Hester F ^e   Haitsma, Iain ^e   Vos, Pieter E ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^e ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

computed tomography; Glasgow Outcome Scale; guideline adherence; intracranial pressure; multivariate analysis; traumatic brain injury

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN HEMORRHAGE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FALLING; FEMALE; GLASGOW COMA SCALE; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; HYPOXIA; INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE; INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE MONITORING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PUPIL REFLEX; SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE; SUBDURAL HEMATOMA; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY; VIOLENCE;

ADULT; AGED; BRAIN INJURIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TRAUMA SEVERITY INDICES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84861527811     PISSN: 00903493     EISSN: 15300293     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182474bde     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Padayachy LC, Figaji AA, Bullock MR: Intracranial pressure monitoring for traumatic brain injury in the modern era. Childs Nerv Syst 2010; 26:441-452
2. Miller JD, Becker DP, Ward JD, et al: Significance of intracranial hypertension in severe head injury. J Neurosurg 1977; 47:503-516
3. Enblad P, Nilsson P, Chambers I, et al; Brain IT Group: R3-survey of traumatic brain injury management in European Brain IT centres year 2001. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30:1058-1065
4. Lobato RD, Sarabia R, Rivas JJ, et al: Normal computerized tomography scans in severe head injury. Prognostic and clinical management implications. J Neurosurg 1986; 65:784-789
5. Narayan RK, Greenberg RP, Miller JD, et al: Improved confidence of outcome prediction in severe head injury. A comparative analysis of the clinical examination, multimodality evoked potentials, CT scanning, and intracranial pressure. J Neurosurg 1981; 54:751-762
6. Patel HC, Menon DK, Tebbs S, et al: Specialist neurocritical care and outcome from head injury. Intensive Care Med 2002; 28:547-553
7. Palmer S, Bader MK, Qureshi A, et al: The impact on outcomes in a community hospital setting of using the AANS traumatic brain injury guidelines. Americans Associations for Neurologic Surgeons. J Trauma 2001; 50:657-664
8. Lane PL, Skoretz TG, Doig G, et al: Intracranial pressure monitoring and outcomes after traumatic brain injury. Can J Surg 2000; 43:442-448
9. Bratton SL, Chestnut RM, Ghajar J, et al; Brain Trauma Foundation; American Association of Neurological Surgeons; Congress of Neurological Surgeons; Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care, AANS/CNS: Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. VI. Indications for intracranial pressure monitoring. J Neurotrauma 2007; 24 Suppl 1:S37-S44
10. Maas AI, Dearden M, Teasdale GM, et al: EBIC-guidelines for management of severe head injury in adults. European Brain Injury Consortium. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1997; 139:286-294
11. Andrews PJ, Citerio G, Longhi L, et al; Neuro-Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (NICEM) Section of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine: NICEM consensus on neurological monitoring in acute neurological disease. Intensive Care Med 2008; 34:1362-1370
12. Cremer OL, van Dijk GW, van Wensen E, et al: Effect of intracranial pressure monitoring and targeted intensive care on functional outcome after severe head injury. Crit Care Med 2005; 33:2207-2213
13. Shafi S, Diaz-Arrastia R, Madden C, et al: Intracranial pressure monitoring in brain-injured patients is associated with worsening of survival. J Trauma 2008; 64:335-340
14. Salim A, Hannon M, Brown C, et al: Intracranial pressure monitoring in severe isolated pediatric blunt head trauma. Am Surg 2008; 74:1088-1093
15. Stevens RD, Bhardwaj A: Evolving paradigms in the management of severe traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med 2005; 33:2415-2417
16. Stover JF, Steiger P, Stocker R: Need for intracranial pressure monitoring following severe traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med 2006; 34:1582-1583; author reply 1583
17. Chesnut RM: The evolving management of traumatic brain injury: Don't shoot the messenger. Crit Care Med 2006; 34:2262; author reply 2262-2262; author reply 2263
18. Rincon F, Mayer SA: Does intracranial pressure monitoring improve outcome after severe traumatic brain injury? Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2006; 6:507-508
19. Maas AI, Stocchetti N, Bullock R: Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in adults. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7:728-741
20. Chesnut RM: Intracranial pressure monitoring in brain-injured patients is associated with worsening of survival. J Trauma 2008; 65:500-501
21. Boret H, Montcriol A, Meaudre E: The worsening of survival among patients with brain injuries monitored with ICP versus those not monitored with ICP. J Trauma 2008; 65:499
22. Grände PO, Reinstrup P: Do conventional treatments of severe traumatic head injury worsen outcome? J Trauma 2009; 67:415-416
23. Fakhry SM, Trask AL, Waller MA, et al; IRTC Neurotrauma Task Force: Management of brain-injured patients by an evidence-based medicine protocol improves outcomes and decreases hospital charges. J Trauma 2004; 56:492-499; discussion 499
24. Becker DP, Miller JD, Ward JD, et al: The outcome from severe head injury with early diagnosis and intensive management. J Neurosurg 1977; 47:491-502
25. Bulger EM, Nathens AB, Rivara FP, et al; Brain Trauma Foundation: Management of severe head injury: Institutional variations in care and effect on outcome. Crit Care Med 2002; 30:1870-1876
26. Heskestad B, Baardsen R, Helseth E, et al: Guideline compliance in management of minimal, mild, and moderate head injury: High frequency of noncompliance among individual physicians despite strong guideline support from clinical leaders. J Trauma 2008; 65:1309-1313
27. Huizenga JE, Zink BJ, Maio RF, et al: Guidelines for the management of severe head injury: Are emergency physicians following them? Acad Emerg Med 2002; 9:806-812
28. Andriessen TM, Horn J, Franschman G, et al: Epidemiology, severity classification, and outcome of moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: A prospective multicenter study. J Neurotrauma 2011; 28:2019-2031
29. Jacobs B, Beems T, van der Vliet TM, et al: The status of the fourth ventricle and ambient cisterns predict outcome in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2010; 27:331-340
30. Jacobs B, Beems T, Stulemeijer M, et al: Outcome prediction in mild traumatic brain injury: Age and clinical variables are stronger predictors than CT abnormalities. J Neurotrauma 2010; 27:655-668
31. Jacobs B, Beems T, van der Vliet TM, et al: Computed tomography and outcome in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: Hematoma volume and midline shift revisited. J Neurotrauma 2011; 28:203-215
32. Marshall LF, Eisenberg HM: A new classification of head injury based on computerized tomography. J Neurosurg 1991; 75:S14-S20
33. Vos PE, van Voskuilen AC, Beems T, et al: Evaluation of the traumatic coma data bank computed tomography classification for severe head injury. J Neurotrauma 2001; 18:649-655
34. Pasqualin A, Barone G, Cioffi F, et al: The relevance of anatomic and hemodynamic factors to a classification of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery 1991; 28:370-379
35. Wilson JT, Edwards P, Fiddes H, et al: Reliability of postal questionnaires for the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J Neurotrauma 2002; 19:999-1005
36. Wilson JT, Pettigrew LE, Teasdale GM: Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: Guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma 1998; 15:573-585
37. Durrleman S, Simon R: Flexible regression models with cubic splines. Stat Med 1989; 8:551-561
38. D'Agostino RB Jr: Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med 1998; 17:2265-2281
39. Steyerberg EW, Mushkudiani N, Perel P, et al: Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: Development and international validation of prognostic scores based on admission characteristics. PLoS Med 2008; 5:e165; discussion e165
40. Mauritz W, Steltzer H, Bauer P, et al: Monitoring of intracranial pressure in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: An Austrian prospective multicenter study. Intensive Care Med 2008; 34:1208-1215
41. Maas AI, Steyerberg EW, Butcher I, et al: Prognostic value of computerized tomography scan characteristics in traumatic brain injury: Results from the IMPACT study. J Neurotrauma 2007; 24:303-314
42. Sahjpaul R, Girotti M: Intracranial pressure monitoring in severe traumatic brain injury-results of a Canadian survey. Can J Neurol Sci 2000; 27:143-147
43. Jeevaratnam DR, Menon DK: Survey of intensive care of severely head injured patients in the United Kingdom. BMJ 1996; 312:944-947
44. Narayan RK, Kishore PR, Becker DP, et al: Intracranial pressure: To monitor or not to monitor? A review of our experience with severe head injury. J Neurosurg 1982; 56:650-659
45. Bremmer R, de Jong BM, Wagemakers M, et al: The course of intracranial pressure in traumatic brain injury: Relation with outcome and CT-characteristics. Neurocrit Care 2010; 12:362-368
46. Stocchetti N, Longhi L, Zanier ER: Intracranial pressure monitoring for traumatic brain injury: Available evidence and clinical implications. Minerva Anestesiol 2008; 74:197-203
47. Murray GD, Teasdale GM, Braakman R, et al: The European Brain Injury Consortium survey of head injuries. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1999; 141:223-236
48. Myburgh JA, Cooper DJ, Finfer SR, et al; Australasian Traumatic Brain Injury Study (ATBIS) Investigators for the Australian; New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group: Epidemiology and 12-month outcomes from traumatic brain injury in australia and new zealand. J Trauma 2008; 64:854-862
49. Compagnone C, d'Avella D, Servadei F, et al: Patients with moderate head injury: A prospective multicenter study of 315 patients. Neurosurgery 2009; 64:690-696; discussion 696
50. Narayan RK, Maas AI, Servadei F, et al; Traumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage Study Group: Progression of traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage: A prospective observational study. J Neurotrauma 2008; 25:629-639
51. Servadei F, Murray GD, Penny K, et al: The value of the "worst" computed tomographic scan in clinical studies of moderate and severe head injury. European Brain Injury Consortium. Neurosurgery 2000; 46:70-75; discussion 75
52. Bekar A, Dogan S, Abas F, et al: Risk factors and complications of intracranial pressure monitoring with a fiberoptic device. J Clin Neurosci 2009; 16:236-240
53. Anderson RC, Kan P, Klimo P, et al: Complications of intracranial pressure monitoring in children with head trauma. J Neurosurg 2004; 101(1 Suppl):53-58
54. Münch E, Weigel R, Schmiedek P, et al: The Camino intracranial pressure device in clinical practice: Reliability, handling characteristics and complications. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1998; 140:1113-1119; discussion 1119