Application of a standardized anatomical classification in a Chinese partial nephrectomy series

International Journal of Urology

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 551-558

  Kong, Wen ^a   Zhang, Jin ^a   Dong, Baijun ^a   Chen, Yonghui ^a   Xue, Wei ^a   Liu, Dongming ^a   Huang, Yiran ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

Author keywords

Complications; Learning curve; Partial nephrectomy; Renal tumors; Warm ischemia time

Indexed keywords

HEMOSTATIC AGENT;

ACUTE HEART INFARCTION; ACUTE KIDNEY FAILURE; ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL EMBOLISM; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CANCER SURGERY; CHINESE; COMORBIDITY; FEMALE; FEVER; HEMODIALYSIS; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; ISCHEMIA; KIDNEY DYSFUNCTION; KIDNEY TUMOR; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; POSTOPERATIVE ILEUS; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREOPERATIVE ASPECTS AND DIMENSIONS USED FOR AN ANATOMICAL SCORE; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; SPLEEN INJURY; STENT; STRESS ULCER; TUMOR VOLUME; URINE INCONTINENCE; WOUND DEHISCENCE; WOUND INFECTION;

BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; CHINA; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEPHRECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; WARM ISCHEMIA;

EID: 84861483132     PISSN: 09198172     EISSN: 14422042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.02973.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Van Poppel H, Da Pozzo L, Albrecht W etal. A prospective randomized EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the complications of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma. Eur. Urol. 2007; 51: 1606-15.
2. Van Poppel H. Efficacy and safety of nephron-sparing surgery. Int. J. Urol. 2010; 17: 314-26.
3. Ficarra V, Novara G, Secco S etal. Preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification of renal tumours in patients who are candidates for nephron-sparing surgery. Eur. Urol. 2009; 56: 786-93.
4. Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J. Urol. 2009; 182: 844-53.
5. Hew MN, Baseskioglu B, Barwari K etal. Critical Appraisal of the PADUA Classification and Assessment of the R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score in Patients Undergoing Partial Nephrectomy. J. Urol. 2011; 186: 42-6.
6. Waldert M, Waalkes S, Klatte T etal. External validation of the preoperative anatomical classification for prediction of complications related to nephron-sparing surgery. World J. Urol. 2010; 28: 531-5.
7. Mottrie A, Schatteman P, De Wil P, De Troyer B, Novara G, Ficarra V. Validation of the preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) score in a robot-assisted partial nephrectomy series. World J. Urol. 2011; DOI: 10.1007/s00345-010-0639-y.
8. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann. Surg. 2004; 240: 205-13.
9. Hayn MH, Schwaab T, Underwood W, Kim HL. RENAL nephrometry score predicts surgical outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. BJU Int. 2011; 108: 876-81.
10. Samplaski MK, Hernandez A, Gill IS, Simmons MN. C-index is associated with functional outcomes after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J. Urol. 2010; 184: 2259-63.
11. Simmons MN, Ching CB, Samplaski MK, Park CH, Gill IS. Kidney tumor location measurement using the C index method. J. Urol. 2010; 183: 1708-13.
12. Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Lane BR etal. Comparison of 1, 800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J. Urol. 2007; 178: 41-6.
13. Nguyen MM, Gill IS. Halving ischemia time during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J. Urol. 2008; 179: 627-32; discussion 632.
14. Weight CJ, Lane BR, Gill IS. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for selected central tumours: omitting the bolster. BJU Int. 2007; 100: 375-8.
15. Gill IS, Kamoi K, Aron M, Desai MM. 800 Laparoscopic partial nephrectomies: a single surgeon series. J. Urol. 2010; 183: 34-41.
16. Simhan J, Smaldone MC, Tsai KJ etal. Objective Measures of Renal Mass Anatomic Complexity Predict Rates of Major Complications Following Partial Nephrectomy. Eur. Urol. 2011; 60: 724-30.
17. Reisiger K, Venkatesh R, Figenshau RS, Bae KT, Landman J. Complex laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal hilar tumors. Urology. 2005; 65: 888-91.
18. Lattouf JB, Beri A, D'Ambros OF, Grull M, Leeb K, Janetschek G. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for hilar tumors: technique and results. Eur. Urol. 2008; 54: 409-16.
19. Gill IS, Colombo JR Jr, Frank I, Moinzadeh A, Kaouk J, Desai M. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for hilar tumors. J. Urol. 2005; 174: 850-3; discussion 853-4.
20. Lieser G, Simmons MN. Developments in kidney tumor nephrometry. Postgrad. Med. 2011; 123: 35-42.