An ecological alternative to Snodgrass & Vanderwart: 360 high quality colour images with norms for seven psycholinguistic variables

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2012, Pages

  Moreno Martínez, Francisco Javier ^a   Montoro, Pedro R ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE EDUCACIÓN A DISTANCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; COLOR VISION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ETHNIC GROUP; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE PROCESSING; LINGUISTICS; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; SEMANTICS; SPANISH; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEMANTICS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84861478178     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037527     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Snodgrass JG, Vanderwart M, (1980) A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory 6: 174-215.
2. Ellis AW, Morrison CM, (1998) Real age of acquisition effects in lexical retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 24: 515-523.
3. Funnell E, Sheridan J, (1992) Categories of knowledge: Unfamiliar aspects of living and nonliving things. Cognitive Neuropsychology 9: 135-153.
4. Gilhooly KJ, Gilhooly ML, (1979) Age-of-acquisition effects in lexical and episodic memory. Memory & Cognition 7: 213-223.
5. Humphreys GW, Forde EME, (2001) Category-specific deficits: A major review and presentation of the Hierarchical Interactive Theory (HIT). Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24: 480-481.
6. Holmes S, Fitch FJ, Ellis A, (2006) Age of Acquisition affects object recognition and naming in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 28: 1010-1022.
7. Silveri MC, Cappa A, Mariotti P, Puopolo M, (2002) Naming in patients with Alzheimer's disease: Influence of age of acquisition and categorical effects. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 24: 755-764.
8. Allport DA, (1985) Distributed memory, modular subsystems and dysphasia In: Newman SK, Epstein R, editors. Current perspectives in dysphasia Edinburgh (pp 32-60): Churchill Livingstone.
9. Buxbaum LJ, Saffran EM, (2002) Knowledge of object manipulation and object function: Dissociations in apraxic and nonapraxic subjects. Brain & Language 82: 179-199.
10. Magnié MN, Besson M, Poncet M, Dolisi C, (2003) The Snodgrass and Vanderwart set revisited: Norms for object manipulability and for pictorial ambiguity of objects, chimeric objects and nonobjects. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology 25: 521-560.
11. Tranel D, Logan CG, Randall JF, Damasio AR, (1997) Explaining category-related effects in the retrieval of conceptual and lexical knowledge for concrete entities: operationalization and analysis of factors. Neuropsychologia 35: 1329-1339.
12. Warrington EK, McCarthy RA, (1987) Categories of knowledge: Further fractionations and an attempted integration. Brain 110: 1273-1296.
13. Capitani E, Laiacona M, Mahon B, Caramazza A, (2003) What are the facts of semantic category-specific deficits? A critical review of the clinical evidence. Cognitive Neuropsychology 20: 213-261.
14. Rosch EH, (1973) Natural Categories. Cognitive Psychology 4: 328-350.
15. Rosch EH, Mervis CB, (1975) Family Resemblances: Studies in the Internal Structure of Categories. Cognitive Psychology 7: 573-605.
16. Rosch EH, Simpson C, Miller RS, (1976) Structural Bases of Typicality Effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2: 491-502.
17. Kiran S, Thomson CK, (2003) Effect of typicality on online category verification of animate category exemplars in aphasia. Brain & Language 85: 441-450.
18. Adlam AL, Paterson K, Bozeat S, Hodges JR, (2010) The Cambridge semantic memory test battery: Detection of semantic deficits in semantic dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Neurocase 16: 193-207.
19. Adlington RL, Laws KR, Gale TM, (2008) The Hatfield Image Test (HIT): A new picture test and norms for experimental and clinical use. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology 31: 731-753.
20. Brodeur MB, Dionne-Dostie E, Montreuil T, Lepage M, (2010) The BOSS, a new set of 538 normalized photos of objects to be used as ecological stimuli in vision and memory paradigms. PLoS ONE 5 (5): e10773 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010773.
21. Bunn EM, Tyler LK, Moss HE, (1998) Category-specific semantic deficit: The role of familiarity and property type re-examined. Neuropsychology 12: 367-379.
22. Dimitropoulou M, Duñabeitia JA, Blitsas P, Carreiras M, (2009) A standardized set of 260 pictures for Modern Greek: Norms for name agreement, age of acquisition and visual complexity. Behavior Research Methods 41: 584-589.
23. McKenna P, (1998) The category-specific Names Test Hove: Psychological Press.
24. Moreno FJ, Cañamón S, (2005) Presentación y resultados preliminares de la Batería Nombela (I): Un nuevo instrumento para evaluar el deterioro semántico categorial. Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica 10: 205-219.
25. Moreno-Martínez FJ, Peraita H, (2007) Un nuevo conjunto de ítems para la evaluación de la disociación ser vivo/ser no vivo con normas obtenidas de ancianos sanos españoles. Psicológica 28: 1-20.
26. Pérez MA, Navalón C, (2003) Normas españolas de 290 nuevos dibujos: acuerdo en la denominación, concordancia de la imagen, familiaridad, complejidad visual y variabilidad de la imagen. Psicológica 24: 215-241.
27. Rossion B, Pourtois G, (2004) Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's object pictorial set: the role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition. Perception 33: 217-236.
28. Viggiano MP, Vannucci M, Righi S, (2004) A new standardized set of ecological pictures for experimental and clinical research on visual object processing. Cortex 40: 494-509.
29. Hodges JR, Salmon DP, Butters N, (1992) Semantic memory impairment in Alzheimer's disease: Failure of access or degraded knowledge? Neuropsychologia 30: 301-314.
30. Moreno-Martínez FJ, Montoro PR, Laws KR, (2011) A set of high quality colour images with Spanish norms for seven relevant psycholinguistic variables. Aging, Neuropsychology & Cognition 18: 293-327.
31. Dell'Acqua R, Lotto L, Job R, (2000) Naming times and standardized norms for the Italian PD/DPSS set of pictures: Direct comparisons with American, English, French, and Spanish published databases. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 32: 588-615.
32. Price CJ, Humphreys GW, (1989) The effects of surface detail on object categorization and naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A Human Experimental Psychology 41: 797-827.
33. Tanaka JW, Presnell LM, (1999) Colour diagnosticity in object recognition. Perception and Psychophysics 61: 1140-1153.
34. Adlington RL, Laws KR, Gale TM, (2009) Visual processing in Alzheimer's disease: Surface detail and colour fail to aid object identification. Neuropsychologia 47: 2574-2583.
35. Done DH, Gale TM, (1997) Attribute verification in dementia of Alzheimer type: Evidence for the preservation of distributed concept knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology 14: 547-571.
36. Grossman M, Robinson K, Biassou N, White-Devine T, D'Esposito MD, (1998) Semantic memory in Alzheimer's disease: representativeness, ontologic category, and material. Neuropsychology 12: 34-42.
37. Laws KR, Gale TM, Leeson VC, Crawford JR, (2005) When is category-specific in Alzheimer's disease. Cortex 41: 452-463.
38. Moreno-Martínez FJ, (2010) Size matters: A study on naming and size knowledge in dementia of the Alzheimer type. Neurocase 16: 494-502.
39. Moreno-Martínez FJ, Laws KR, (2007) An attenuation of the 'normal' category effect in patients with Alzheimer's disease: a review and bootstrap analysis. Brain & Cognition 63: 167-173.
40. Moreno-Martínez FJ, Laws KR, (2008) No category-specificity in Alzheimer's disease: A normal aging effect. Neuropsychology 22: 485-490.
41. Moreno-Martínez FJ, Tallón-Barranco A, Frank-Garcia A, (2007) Enfermedad de Alzheimer, deterioro categorial y variables relevantes en la denominación de objetos. Revista de Neurología 44: 129-133.
42. Tyler LK, Bright P, Dick E, Tavares P, Pilgrim L, et al. (2003) Do semantic categories activate distinct cortical regions? Evidence for a distributed neural semantic system. Cognitive Neuropsychology 20: 541-559.
43. Laws KR, (2005) Illusions of normality: A methodological critique of category-specific naming. Cortex 41: 842-851.
44. Laiacona M, Barbarotto R, Trivelli C, Capitani E, (1993) Disossociazioni semantiche intercategoriali: descrizione di una batteria standrdizzata e dati normativi Archivio di Psicologia. Neurologia e Psichiatria 54: 209-248.
45. Whatmough C, Chertkow H, Murtha S, Templeman D, Babins L, et al. (2003) The semantic category effect increases with worsening anomia in Alzheimer's type dementia. Brain & Language 84: 134-147.
46. Barbarotto R, Capitani E, Laiacona M, (2001) Living musical instruments and inanimate body parts. Neuropsychologia 39: 406-414.
47. Warrington EK, Shallice T, (1984) Category specific semantic impairments. Brain 107: 829-854.
48. Caramazza A, Shelton JR, (1998) Domain-specific knowledge systems in the brain: the animate-inanimate distinction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 10: 1-34.
49. Crutch SJ, Warrington EK, (2003) The selective impairment of fruit and vegetable knowledge: A multiple processing channels account of fine-grain category specificity. Cognitive Neuropsychology 20: 355-372.
50. McRae K, Cree GS, (2002) Factors underlying category-specific semantic deficits. In: Forde EME, Humphreys, editors. Category-specificity in mind and brain East Sussex Psychology Press pp. 211-249.
51. Samson D, Pillon A, (2003) A case of impairment knowledge for fruits and vegetables. Cognitive Neuropsychology 20: 373-400.
52. Sebastián N, Martí MA, Carreiras MF, Cuetos F, (2000) LEXESP, Léxico informatizado del Español Barcelona: Ediciones de la Universitat de Barcelona.
53. Blair IV, Urland GR, Ma JE, (2002) Using internet search engines to estimate word frequency. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 34: 286-290.
54. Baayen RH, Piepenbrock R, Gulikers L, (1995) The CELEX lexical database Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
55. Kucera H, Francis W, (1967) Computational analysis of present-day American English Providence: Brown University Press.
56. Moreno-Martínez FJ, Montoro PR, (2010) Longitudinal patterns of fluency impairment in dementia: The role of domain and "nuisance variables". Aphasiology 11: 1389-1399.
57. Cover TM, Thomas JA, (2006) Elements of Information Theory (2nd Edition) Hoboken Wiley and Sons.
58. Álvarez B, Cuetos F, (2007) Objective age of acquisition norms for a set of 328 words in Spanish. Behavior, Research, Methods 39: 377-383.
59. Sanfeliu MC, Fernández A, (1996) A set of 254 Snodgrass-Vanderwart pictures standardized for Spanish: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers 28: 537-555.
60. Mahon BZ, Caramazza A, (2003) Constraining questions about the organisation and representation of conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology 20: 433-450.
61. Caramazza A, Mahon BZ, (2003) The organization of conceptual knowledge: the evidence from category-specific semantic deficits. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7: 325-374.
62. Shelton JR, Fouch E, Caramazza A, (1998) The selective sparing of body parts knowledge: A case study. Neurocase 4: 339-351.
63. Filliter JH, McMullen PA, Westwood D, (2005) Manipulability and living/non-living category effects on object identification. Brain & Cognition 57: 61-65.
64. Oldfield RC, Wingfield A, (1965) Response latencies in naming objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 17: 273-281.
65. Freeman J, Simoncelli EP, (2011) Metamers of the ventral stream. Nature Neuroscience 9: 1195-1201.
66. Girshick AR, Landy MS, Simoncelli EP, (2011) Cardinal rules: Visual orientation perception reflects knowledge of environmental statistics. Nature Neuroscience 14: 926-932.
67. Torralba A, (2009) How many pixels make an image? Visual Neuroscience 26: 123-131.
68. Tenenbaum JB, Kemp C, Griffiths TL, Goodman ND, (2011) How to grow a mind: Statistics, Structure, and Abstraction. Science 331: 1279-1285.
69. Griffiths TL, Chater N, Kemp C, Perfors A, Tenenbaum JB, (2010) Probabilistic models of cognition: Exploring representations and inductive biases. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14: 357-364.