The Hatfield Image Test (HIT): A new picture test and norms for experimental and clinical use

Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 731-753

  Adlington, Rebecca L ^a   Laws, Keith R ^a   Gale, Tim M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN ELIZABETH II HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Anomia; Category naming; Ceiling effects; Colour; Normative data

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CHILD; CONCEPT FORMATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGINATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; NOMENCLATURE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION; REFERENCE VALUE; SEMANTICS; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CONCEPT FORMATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NAMES; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); REFERENCE VALUES; SEMANTICS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 74949127623     PISSN: 13803395     EISSN: 1744411X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13803390802488103     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Alario, F. X., Ferrand, L., Laganaro, M., New, B., Frauenfelder, U. H., & Segui, J. (2004). Predictors of picture naming speed. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 140-155.
2. Ardila, A., Ostrosky-Solis, F., Rosselli, M., & Gómez, C. (2000). Age-related cognitive decline during normal aging: The complex effect of education. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15, 495-513.
3. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
4. Barbarotto, R., Capitani, E., & Laiacona, M. (2001). Living musical instruments and inanimate body parts. Neuropsychologia, 39, 406-414.
5. Berndt, R. S., Burton, M. W., Haendiges, A. N., & Mitchum, C. C. (2002). Production of nouns and verbs in aphasia: Effects of elicitation context. Aphasiology, 16, 83-106.
6. Biederman, I., & Ju, G. (1988). Surface versus edge-based determinants of visual recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 38-64.
7. Blair, I. V., Urland, G. R., & Ma, J. E. (2002). Using internet search engines to estimate word frequency. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 286-290.
8. Caramazza, A., & Shelton, J. R. (1998). Domain-specific knowledge systems in the brain: The animate-inanimate distinction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 1-34.
9. Carroll, J. B., & White, M. N. (1973). Age-of-acquisition norms for 220 pictureable nouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 12, 563-576.
10. D'Agostino, R. B., Belanger, A., & D'Agostino, R. B., Jr. (1990). A suggestion for using powerful and informative tests for normality. The American Statistician, 44, 316-321.
11. Dell'Acqua, R., Lotto, L., & Job, R. (2000). Naming times and standardised norms for the Italian PD/DPSS sets of 266 pictures: Direct comparisons with American, English, French and Spanish published databases. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32, 588-615.
12. Delucchi, K. L., & Bostrom, A. (2004). Methods for analysis of skewed data distributions in psychiatric clinical studies: Working with many zero values. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161, 1159-1168.
13. Fery, P., & Morais, J. (2003). A case study of visual agnosia without perceptual processing or structural descriptions impairment. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 595-618.
14. Funnell, E., & Sheridan, J. (1992). Categories of knowledge? Unfamiliar aspects of living and nonliving things. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 9, 135-153.
15. Gale, T. M., Irvine, K., Laws, K. R., & Ferrissey, S. (in press). The naming profile in Alzheimer patients parallels that of elderly controls. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology.
16. Grossman, M., Galetta, S., & D'Esposito, M. (1997). Object recognition difficulty in apperceptive agnosia. Brain and Cognition, 33, 306-342.
17. Hamby, S. L., Bardi, C. A., & Wilkins, J. W. (1997). Neuropsychological assessment of relatively intact individuals: Psychometric lessons from a HIV+ sample. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 12, 545-556.
18. Hart, J., Berndt, R. S., & Caramazza, A. (1985). Category-specific naming deficit following cerebral infarction. Nature, 316, 439-440.
19. Hawkins, K. A., & Bender, S. (2002). Norms and the relationship of Boston Naming Test performance to vocabulary and education: A review. Aphasiology, 16, 1143-1153.
20. Hillis, A. E., & Caramazza, A. (1991). Category-specific naming and comprehension impairment: A double dissociation. Brain, 114, 2081-2094.
21. Holmes, S., Fitch, F. J., & Ellis, A. (2006). Age of acquisition affects object recognition and naming in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 28, 1010-1022.
22. Humphrey, G. K., Goodale, M. A., Jakobson, L. S., & Servos, P. (1994). The role of surface recognition in object perception: Studies of visual form agnosic and normal subjects. Perception, 23, 1457-1481.
23. Kent, P., & Luszcz, M. A. (2002). A review of Boston and multiple occasion normative data for older adults on 15-item versions. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 16, 555-574.
24. Köhler, S., Moscovitch, M., Winocur, G., & McIntosh, A. R. (2000). Episodic encoding and recognition of pictures and words: Role of human medial temporal lobes. Acta Psychologica, 105, 159-179.
25. Kučera, H., & Francis, W. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
26. Laws, K. R. (2005). Illusions of normality: A methodological critique of category-specific naming. Cortex, 41, 842-851.
27. Laws, K. R., Adlington, R. L., Gale, T. M., Moreno-Martínez, F. J., & Sartori, G. (2007). Meta analysis of category naming in Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2674-2682.
28. Laws, K. R., & Gale, T. M. (2002). Category-specific naming and the "visual" characteristics of line drawn stimuli. Cortex, 38, 7-21.
29. Laws, K. R., Gale, T. M., Frank, R. J., & Davey, N. (2002). Visual similarity is greater for line drawings of nonliving things: The importance of musical instruments and body-parts. Brain and Cognition, 48, 421-423.
30. Laws, K. R., Gale, T. M., Leeson, V. C., & Crawford, J. (2005). When is category specific in Alzheimer's disease. Cortex, 41, 452-463.
31. Laws, K. R., & Hunter, M. Z. (2006). The impact of colour, spatial resolution, and presentation speed on category naming. Brain and Cognition, 62, 89-97.
32. Laws, K. R., Leeson, V. C., & Gale, T. M. (2002). A domain-specific deficit for foodstuffs in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 8, 956-957.
33. Laws, K. R., & Neve, C. (1999). A "normal" category-specific advantage for naming living things. Neuropsychologia, 37, 1263-1269.
34. McRae, K., & Cree, G. S. (2002). Factors underlying category-specific semantic deficits. In E. M. E. Forde & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Category-specificity in brain and mind (pp. 211-249). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
35. Mapelli, D., & Behrmann, M. (1997). The role of colour in object recognition: Evidence from visual agnosia. Neurocase, 3, 237-247.
36. Moreno-Martínez, F. J., & Laws, K. R. (2007). An attenuation of the "normal" category effect in patients with Alzheimer's disease? Brain and Cognition, 63, 136-142.
37. Moreno-Martínez, F. J., & Laws, K. R. (2008). No category specificity in Alzheimer's disease: A normal aging effect. Neuropsychology, 22, 485-490.
38. Moreno-Martínez, F. J., & Peraita, H. (2007). Un nuevo conjunto de ítems para la evaluación de la disociación ser vivo/ser no vivo con normas obtenidas de ancianos sanos españoles [A new set of items for the evaluation of living/nonliving dissociations with norms collected from healthy elderly Spanish]. Psicológica, 28, 1-20.
39. Oliva, A., & Schyns, P. (2000). Diagnostic colors mediate scene recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 176-210.
40. Ostergaard, A. L., & Davidoff, J. B. (1985). Some effects of colour on naming and recognition of objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 579-587.
41. Ousset, P. J., Viallard, G., Puel, M., Celsis, P., Demonet, J. F., & Cardebat, D. (2002). Lexical therapy and episodic word learning in dementia of the Alzheimer's type. Brain and Language, 30, 14-20.
42. Pashler, H., & Harris, C. R. (2001). Spontaneous allocation of visual attention: Dominant role of uniqueness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 747-752.
43. Pechmann, T., & Zerbst, D. (2002). The activation of world class information during speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 233-243.
44. Pérez, M. A., & Navalón, C. (2003). Normas espanõlas de 290 nuevos dibujos: Acuerdo en la denominación, concorancia de la imagen, familiaridad, complejidad visual y variabilidad de la imagen [Spanish norms for 290 new drawings: Name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, visual complexity, and image variability]. Psicológia, 24, 215-241.
45. Price, C. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). The effects of surface detail on object categorization and naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 797-827.
46. Rossion, B., & Pourtois, G. (2004). Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's object pictorial set: The role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition. Perception, 33, 217-236.
47. Silveri, M. C., & Gainotti, G. (1988). Interaction between vision and language in category-specific semantic impairment. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 677-709.
48. Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174-215.
49. Snodgrass, J. G., & Yuditsky, T. (1996). Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 516-536.
50. Stark, C. E. L., & Squire, L. R. (2000). fMRI activity in the medial temporal lobe during recognition memory as a function of study-test interval. Hippocampus, 10, 329-337.
51. Stewart, F., Parkin, A. J., & Hunkin, N. M. (1992). Naming impairments following recovery form herpes simplex encephalitis: Category-specific? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A, 261-284.
52. Tanaka, J. W., & Presnell, L. M. (1999). Colour diagnosticity in object recognition. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 1140-1153.
53. Tanaka, J. W., Weiskopf, D., & Williams, P. (2001). The role of colour in high-level vision. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 211-215.
54. Taylor, N. R. (2006) Testbed version 1.0 [software]. Hatfield, UK: University of Hertfordshire.
55. Van Petten, C., Senkfor, A. J., & Newberg, W. M. (2000). Memory for line drawings in locations: Spatial source memory and event-related potentials. Psychophysiology, 37, 551-564.
56. Viggiano, M. P., & Vannucci, M. (2002). Drawing and identifying objects in relation to semantic category and handedness. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1482-1487.
57. Viggiano, M. P., Vannucci, M., & Righi, S. (2004). A new standardised set of ecological pictures for experimental and clinical research on visual object processing. Cortex, 40, 491-509.
58. Ward, J., & Parkin, A. J. (2000). Pathological false recognition and source memory deficits following frontal lobe damage. Neurocase, 6, 333-344.
59. Warrington, E. K., & Shallice, T. (1984). Category specific semantic impairments. Brain, 107, 829-854.
60. Wurm, L. H., Legge, G. E., Isenberg, L. M., & Luebker, A. (1993). Color improves object recognition in normal and low vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 899-911.