The struggle for contested boundaries in the move to collaborative care teams in Australian maternity care

Midwifery

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 298-305

  McIntyre, Meredith ^a   Francis, Karen ^b   Chapman, Ysanne ^c  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BALLARAT   (Australia)

^c CENTRAL QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Australia; Critical discourse analysis; Maternity care; Reform

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; COOPERATION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SERVICE; HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MATERNAL WELFARE; MIDWIFE; NURSING PRACTICE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PREGNANCY; PUBLIC HEALTH; PUBLIC RELATIONS;

AUSTRALIA; COMMUNICATION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE REFORM; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; MATERNAL HEALTH SERVICES; MATERNAL WELFARE; MIDWIFERY; NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAMS; NURSE'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY DEPARTMENT, HOSPITAL; PREGNANCY; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE;

EID: 84861462200     PISSN: 02666138     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2011.04.004     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Askey-Doran, P., 2008. Submission to the National Review of Maternity Services.
2. Australian College of Midwives, 2008. Australian College of Midwives: Submission to Maternity Services Review.
3. Australian Medical Association, 2008. AMA: Submission to Maternity Services Review.
4. Barclay, L.M., Farrington, C., Kildea, S., et al., 2008. Charles Darwin University Graduate School of Health Practice Submission to the National Review of Maternity Services.
5. Brown S., Darcy M., Bruinsma F., et al. Having a baby in Victoria 1989-2000: continuity and change in the decade following the Victorian Ministerial Review of Birthing Services. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 2002, 26:242-250.
6. Brown S., Davey M., Bruinsma F., et al. Women's views and experiences of postnatal hospital care in the Victorian Survey of Recent Mothers 2000. Midwifery 2005, 21:109-126.
7. Bryant J., Porter M., Tracy S.K., et al. Caesarean birth: consumption, safety, order, and good mothering. Social Science & Medicine 2007, 65:1192-1201.
8. Carter M., Corry M.P., Delbanco S., et al. 2020 vision for a high quality, high value maternity care system. Women's Health Issues 2010, 20:S7-S17.
9. Cheek J., Porter S. Reviewing Foucault: possibilities and problems for nursing and health care. Nursing Inquiry 1997, 4:108-119.
10. Clifford, T., Key, B., Trudgen, M., et al., 2008. Submission to National Review of Maternity Services.
11. Commonwealth of Australia, 2008. Improving Maternity Services in Australia: A Discussion Paper, Australian Government, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Conent/maternityservicesreview-discussionpaper.
12. Commonwealth of Australia, 2009. Improving Maternity Services in Australia: The Report of the Maternity Services Review. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, C. o. Australia.
13. Crowe M. Discourse analysis: towards an understanding of its place in nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2005, 51:55-63.
14. de Costa C., Howat P. School of Medicine, Cairns Base Hospital 2008, James Cook University, Submission to National Review of Maternity Services.
15. Declercq E. Changing Childbirth' in the United Kingdom: lessons for US health policy. Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law 1998, 23:833-859.
16. Dietsch, E., 2008. Charles Sturt Midwifery Research Team: Submission to the National Review of Maternity Services.
17. Ellwood, D., 2008. Women's Hospitals Australasia: Submission to Maternity Services Review.
18. Evers A., Bouwers H., van Egmond-Linden A., et al. Perinatal mortality and severe morbidity in low and high risk term pregnancies in the Netherlands: prospective cohort study. British Medical Journal 2010, 341:1-8.
19. Birth Territory and Midwifery Guardianship: Theory for Practice Education and Research 2008, Elsevier, Sydney. K. Fahy, M. Foureur, C. Hastie (Eds.).
20. New Labour, New Language 2000, Routledge, London. N. Fairclough (Ed.).
21. Discourse and Social Change UK 1992, Polity Press, Cambridge. N. Fairclough (Ed.).
22. Fairclough N. Analysing Discourse:Textual Analysis for Social Research 2003, Routledge, London.
23. Fisher, D., 2008. Royal Women's Hospital Submission to National Maternity Services Review.
24. 1973, Travistock, London. M. Foucault (Ed.).
25. Foureur, M., 2008. Northern Sydney Central Coast Area Health Service Submission to National Maternity Services Review.
26. General Practice Victoria, 2008. GPV Submission National Review Maternity Services.
27. Giles, C., 2008. North East Health Wangaratta. Central Hume Sub Region Consortia Submission National Review Maternity Services.
28. Goondiwindi Midwifery Group Practice, 2008. Submission National Review Materity Services.
29. Hastie C. Midwifery: women, history and politics. Birth Issues 2006, 15:11-17.
30. Hastie, C., 2008. Submission to National Maternity Services Review.
31. Homer, C.S., 2008. Centre for Midwifery Child and Family Health Submission to National Review of Maternity Services.
32. Jordan R.G., Murphy P.A. Risk assessment and risk distortion: finding the balance. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health 2009, 54:191-200.
33. Keirse M.J.N.C. Home birth: gone away, gone astray, and here to stay. Birth 2010, 37:341-346.
34. Kewley, C., 2008. Hunter New England Women's Health and Maternity Network Submission to National Review of Maternity Services.
35. Klein M., Gafni A., Hannah M.E., et al. Not safer and not cheaper? The costs of planned cesarean versus planned vaginal birth in the Term Breech Trial. CMAJ 2006;174(8):1109-1113. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2006, 175:1243.
36. Lane K. The plasticity of professional boundaries: a case study of collaborative care in maternity services. Health Sociology Review 2006, 15:341-352.
37. Laws, P., Li, Z., Sullivan, E.A., et al. 2010. Australia's mothers and babies 2008: perinatal statistic series no. 24. cat. no. PER 50. AIHW. L. Z. Laws PJ & Sullivan EA. Canberra, AIHW.
38. Lee A.S., Kirkman M. Disciplinary discourses: rates of cesarean section explained by medicine, midwifery, and feminism. Health Care for Women International 2008, 29:448-467.
39. Loy C.S., Warton R.B., Dunbar J.A., et al. Workforce trends in specialist and GP obstetric practice in Victoria. Medical Journal of Australia 2007, 186:26-30.
40. 2009, University of Queensland Press, St Lucia. M. MacColl (Ed.).
41. McGrath P., Ray-Barruel G. The easy option? Australian findings on mothers' perception of elective Caesarean as a birth choice after a prior Caesarean section. International Journal of Nursing Practice 2009, 15:271-279.
42. Michaluk C.A. Cesarean delivery by maternal request: what neonatal nurses need to know. Neonatal Network 2009, 28:145-150.
43. Miesnik S.R., Reale B.J. A review of issues surrounding medically elective cesarean delivery. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing 2007, 36:605-615.
44. National Association of Specialist Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2008. NASOG Submission National Maternity Services Review.
45. New South Wales, 2000. The NSW Framework for Maternity Services Health.
46. Newman L. The health care system as a social determinant of health: qualitative insights from South Australian meternity consumers. Australian Health Review 2009, 33:62-71.
47. Nixon A., Power C. Towards a framework for establishing rigour in a discourse analysis of midwifery professionalisation. Nursing Inquiry 2007, 14:71-79.
48. Northern Territory, 2007. National Review of Maternity Services. Government.
49. 1992, Routledge, London. Parker (Ed.).
50. Pesce, A.F., 2008. National Association of Specialist Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Submission National Maternity Services Review.
51. Powers P. The Methodology of Discourse Analysis 2001, Jones & Bartlett, Massachusetts.
52. Purcal N. The politics of midwifery education and training in New South Wales during the last decades of the 19th century. Women and Birth 2008, 21:21-25.
53. Queensland Government, 2005. Rebirthing: a report of the review of maternity services in Queensland. Government.
54. Reiger A neoliberal quickstep: contradictions in Australian maternity policy. Health Sociology Review 2006, 15:330-340.
55. Reiger, Lane K. Working together: collaboration between midwives and doctors in public hospitals. Australian Health Review 2009, 33:315-324.
56. Ricki Lake, 2007. The business of being born. A. Epstein.
57. Roberts C.L., Ford J.B., Algert C.S., et al. Trends in adverse maternal outcomes during childbirth: a population-based study of severe maternal morbidity. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2009, 9:7-17.
58. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2008. RANZCOG: Submission to Maternity Services Review.
59. Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, 2008. RACGP: Submission to Maternity Service Review.
60. Royal Australian New Zealand College Obstetrics Gynaecology, 2008. RANZCOG South Australia and Northern Territory Submission to National Maternity Services Review.
61. Rural Doctors Association of Australia, 2008. RDAA: Submission to Maternity Services Review.
62. Rural Doctors Association of Queensland, 2008. RDAQ Submission to National Review Maternity Services.
63. Rural Doctors Association of Victoria, 2008. RDAV Submission to National Review Maternity Services.
64. Sakala C., Corry M.P. Listening to mothers II reveals maternity care quality chasm. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health 2007, 52:183-185.
65. Sandall J., Devane D., Soltani H., et al. Improving quality and safety in maternity care: the contribution of midwife-led care. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health 2010, 55:255-261.
66. Sandall J., Hatem M., Devane D., et al. Discussions of findings from a Cochrane review of midwife-led versus other models of care for childbearing women: continuity, normality and safety. Midwifery 2009, 25:8-13.
67. Skinner J. Risk: let's look at the bigger picture. Women and Birth 2008, 21:53-54.
68. Smith J.L. Critical discourse analysis for nursing research. Nursing Inquiry 2007, 14:60-70.
69. South Australian Government, 2007. South Australia's Health Care Plan 2007-2016. Government.
70. Tasmanian Government, 2007. Tasmania's Health Plan. Government.
71. Victorian Government, 2004. Future Directions for Victoria's Maternity Services. Government.
72. WA Health, 2008. Women's and Newborns Health Network Executive Advisory Group Submission to the National Review of Maternity Services.
73. Waldenström U. Normal childbirth and evidence based practice. Women and Birth 2007, 20:175-180.
74. Wax J.R., Lucas F., Lamont M., et al. Maternal and newborn morbidity by birth facility among selected United States 2006 low-risk births. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2010, 202:e151-155.
75. Wax J.R., Lucas F.L., Lamont M., et al. Maternal and newborn outcomes in planned home birth vs. planned hospital births: a metaanalysis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2010, 203(3). 243.(e1-8).
76. Wax J.R., Pinette M.G., Cartin A., et al. Home versus hospital birth-process and outcome. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey 2010, 65:132-140.
77. West Australian Government, 2007. Improving Maternity Services: Working together across Western Australia: A Policy Framework. WA Health.
78. Women's and Newborns Health Network Executive Advisory Group, WA Health, 2008. Submission to National Review of Maternity Services.
79. Young D. Cesarean delivery on maternal request was the NIH conference based on a faulty premise?. Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care 2006, 33:171-174.