Characteristics of anatomical landmarks in the mandibular interforaminal region: A cone-beam computed tomography study

Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2012, Pages

  Parnia, Fereidoun ^a   Moslehifard, Elnaz ^a   Hafezeqoran, Ali ^a   Mahboub, Farhang ^b   Mojaver Kahnamoui, Haniye ^c  

^a TABRIZ UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^b TABRIZ UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Anatomical landmarks; Cone beam computed tomography; Implant surgery; Radiographic evaluation; Surgical complications

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANTERIOR LOOPING; ARTICLE; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GENDER; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LINGUAL FORAMEN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MANDIBLE; MANDIBLE FORAMEN; MENTAL FORAMEN; NASOPALATINE DUCT; SURGICAL ANATOMY;

ADULT; AGED; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MANDIBLE; MIDDLE AGED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84861443754     PISSN: 16984447     EISSN: 16986946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4317/medoral.17520     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Caǧirankaya LB, Kansu H. An accessory mental foramen: a case report. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008;9:98-104.
2. Greenstein G, Tarnow D. The mental foramen and nerve: clinical and anatomical factors related to dental implant placement: a literature review. J Periodontol. 2006;77:1933-43.
3. Arzouman MJ, Otis L, Kipnis V, Levine D. Observations of the anterior loop of the inferior alveolar canal. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants.1993;8:295-300.
4. McDonnell D, Reza Nouri M, Todd ME. The mandibular lingual foramen: a consistent arterial foramen in the middle of the mandible. J Anat. 1994;184:363-9.
5. Abarca M, van Steenberghe D, Malevez C, De Ridder J, Jacobs R. Neurosensory disturbances after immediate loading of implants in the anterior mandible: an initial questionnaire approach followed by a psychophysical assessment. Clin Oral Investig. 2006;10:269-77.
6. Uchida Y, Yamashita Y, Goto M, Hanihara T. Measurement of anterior loop length for the mandibular canal and diameter of the mandibular incisive canal to avoid nerve damage when installing endosseous implants in the interforaminal region. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 65;1772-9.
7. Ellies LG. Altered sensation following mandibular implant surgery: a retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:664-71.
8. Rosenquist B. Is there an anterior loop of the inferior alveolar nerve?. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1996;16:40-5.
9. Wismeijer D, van Waas MA, Vermeeren JI, Kalk W. Patients' perception of sensory disturbances of the mental nerve before and after implant surgery: a prospective study of 110 patients. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg.1997;35:254-9.
10. Kaya Y, Sencimen M, Sahin S, Okcu KM, Dogan N, Bahcecitapar M. Retrospective radiographic evaluation of the anterior loop of the mental nerve: comparison between panoramic radiography and spiral computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008; 23:919-25.
11. Harris D, Buser D, Dula K, Grondahl K, Haris D, Jacobs R, et al. E.A. O: guidelines fo the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentis¬try. A consensus workshop organized by the European Association for Osseointegration in Trinity College Dublin. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13:566-70.
12. Frederiksen NL. Diagnostic imaging in dental implantology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995;80:540-54.
13. Parnia F, Fard EM, Mahboub F, Hafezeqoran A, Gavgani FE. Tomographic volume evaluation of submandibular fossa in patients requiring dental implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod.2010;109:e32-6.
14. Makris N, Stamatakis H, Syriopoulos K, Tsiklakis K, van der Stelt PF. Evaluation of the visibility and the course of the mandibular incisive canal and the lingual foramen using cone-beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010; 21:766-71.
15. Madrigal C, Ortega R, Meniz C, López-Quiles J. Study of available bone for interforaminal implant treatment using cone-beam computed tomography. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2008;13:E307-12.
16. Jacobs R, Mraiwa N, vanSteenberghe D, Gijbels F, Quirynen M. Appearance, location, course, and morphology of the mandibular incisive canal: an assessment on spiral CT scan. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2002;31:322-7.
17. Agthong S, Huanmanop T, Chentanez V. Anatomical variation of the supraorbital, infraorbital, and mental foramina related to gender and side. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63:800-4.
18. Neiva RF, Gapski R, Wang HL. Morphometric analysis of implant-related anatomy in Caucasian skulls. J Periodontol. 2004;75:1061-7.
19. de Souza Fernandes AC, de Quadros Uzeda-Gonzalez S, Smith RL, Alonso LG, Gonzalez FM, Santos MV. Tomographic analysis of the interalveolar space and thickness of the vestibular cortical bone in the parasymphyseal region of adult human mandibles. Surg Radiol Anat. 2010;32:951-6.
20. Kohavi D, Bar-Ziv J. Atypical incisive nerve: clinical report. Implant Dent.1996;5:281-3.
21. Mardinger O, Chaushu G, Arensburg B, Taicher S, Kaffe I. Anatomic and radiologic course of the mandibular incisive canal. Surg Radiol Anat. 2000; 22:157-61.
22. Bavitz JB, Harn SD, Hansen CA, Lang M. An anatomical study of mental neurovascular bundle-implant relationships. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8:563-7.
23. Polland KE, Munro S, Reford G, Lockhart A, Logan G, Brocklebank L, et al. The mandibular canal of the edentulous jaw. Clin Anat. 2001;14:445-52.