Measuring scholarly impact in heterogeneous networks

Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting

Volumn 47, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Yan, Erjia ^a   Ding, Ying ^a  

^a School of Library and Information Science   (United States)

Author keywords

Citation; Heterogeneous; Informetric; Network

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861433462     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15508390     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/meet.14504701033     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Bollen, J., Rodriguez, M. A., & Van De Sompel, H. (2006). Journal status. Scientometrics, 69(3), 669-687.
2. Bollen, J., Van de Sompel, H., Hagberg, A., & Chute, R. (2009) A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures. PLoS ONE, 4(6), e6022. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006022.
3. Chen, P., Xie, H., Maslov, S., & Redner, S. (2007). Finding scientific gems with Google's PageRank algorithm. Journal of Informetrics, 1(1), 8-15.
4. Cronin, B. (1984). The citation process: The role and significance of citations in scientific communication. London: Taylor Graham.
5. Davis, P. M. (2008). Eigenfactor: Does the principle of repeated improvement result in better estimates than raw citation counts? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(13), 2186-2188.
6. Ding, Y., Yan, E., Frazho, A., & Caverlee, J. (2009). PageRank for ranking authors in co-citation networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(11), 2229-2243.
7. Ding, Y., & Cronin, B. (2010 forthcoming). Popular and/or Prestigious? Measures of Scholarly Esteem. Information Processing and Management. Retrieved May 13, 2010 from DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2010.01.002
8. Fersht, A. (2009). The most influential journals: Impact Factor and Eigenfactor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 106(17), 6883-6884.
9. Gleich, D.F., Constantine, P.G., Flaxman, A., & Gunawardana, A. (2010). Tracking the random surfer: Empirically measured teleportation parameters in PageRank. Proceeding of the 19th International World Wide Web Conference. Retrieved May 13, 2010 from http://www.stanford.edu/~dgleich/ publications/2010/gleich-2010-teleportation-www2010.pdf
10. Haveliwala, T., Kamvar, S., & Jeh, G. (2003). An analytical comparison of approaches to personalizing PageRank. Stanford University Technical Report. Retrieved August 10, 2009 from http://infolab. Stanford. edu/~taherh/papers/comparison.pdf
11. Leydesdorff, L. (2007). Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(9), 1303-1319.
12. Leydesdorff, L. (2009). How are new citation-based journal indicators adding to the bibliometric toolbox? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(7), 1327-1336.
13. Liu, L. G., Xuan, Z. G., Dang, Z. Y., Guo, Q., & Wang, Z. T. (2007). Weighted network properties of Chinese nature science basic research. Physica A-Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 377(1), 302-314.
14. Liu, X., Bollen, J. Nelson, M. L., & Sompel, H. V. (2005). Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community. Information Processing and Management, 41, 1462-1480.
15. Lopez-Illescas, C, de Moya-Anegn, F., & Moed, H. F. (2008). Coverage and citation impact of oncological journals in the Web of Science and Scopus. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 304-316.
16. Ma, N., Guan, J., & Zhao, Y. (2008). Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis. Information Processing and Management, 44, 800-810.
17. Maslov, S. & Redner, S. (2008). Promise and Pitfalls of Extending Google's PageRank Algorithm to Citation Networks. Journal of Neuroscience, 28(44), 11103-11105.
18. Pinski, G., & Narin, F. (1976). Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics. Information Processing & Management, 12(5), 297-312.
19. Sayyadi, H., & Getoor, L. (2009). FutureRank: Ranking scientific articles by predicting their future PageRank. The Ninth SIAM International Conference on Data Mining. Retrieved August 31, 2009 from hrtp://waimea.cs.umd. edu:8080/basilic/web/Publications/2009/sayyadi:sdm09/sayyadi futureRank-sdm09.pdf
20. SCImago (2007). SJR: SCImago Journal & Country Rank. Retrieved August 31, 2009 from http://www.scimagojr.com
21. Thomason Reuters. (2009). Journal Citation Report. Retrieved October 30, 2009 from http://thomsonreuters.com/products-services/science/scie nce-products/scholarly-research-analysis/research-evalu ation/j ournal-citation-reports
22. Walker, D., Xie, H, Yan, K.K., & Maslov, S. (2007). Ranking scientific publications using a simple model of network traffic. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, P06010, doi: 10.1088/1742-5468/ 2007/06/P06010
23. Yan, E. & Ding, Y. (2009). Applying centrality measures to impact analysis: A coauthorship network analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(10), 2107-2118.
24. Yan, E., & Ding, Y. (2010). Weighted citation: An indicator of an article's prestige. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology.
25. Yan, E. & Ding, Y. (submitted). The effect of dangling nodes on citation networks.
26. Zhou, D, Orshanskiy, S. A., Zha, H, & Giles, C. L. (2007). Co-Ranking authors and documents in a heterogeneous network. 2007 Seventh IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. October 28-31, Omaha, Nebraska, pp.739-744.
27. Zhu, H., Wang, X, Zhu, J. Y. (2003). Effect of aging on network structure. Physical Review E, 68, 056121.