What do people know about key environmental issues? A review of environmental knowledge surveys

Environmental Education Research

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 299-321

  Robelia, Beth ^a   Murphy, Tony ^b  

^a Kitchen Table Learning   (United States)

^b ST CATHERINE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

climate change; environmental education; environmental knowledge; environmental surveys; water quality

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861415257     PISSN: 13504622     EISSN: 14695871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13504622.2011.618288     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Bamberg, S. and Möser, G. 2007. Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27: 14-25.
2. Bauer, M.W., Allum, N. and Miller, S. 2007. What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda. Public Understanding of Science, 16: 79-95.
3. Bedsted, B., and L. Klüver eds. 2009. World wide views on global warming: From the world's citizens to the climate policy-makers. Danish Board of Technology.http://www.wwviews.org/
4. Belden, Russonello, & Stewart, Research and Communications. 2002. Americans and Biodiversity: New Perspectives in 2002, Questionnaire and Topline Results, Washington, DC: For The Biodiversity Project. http://www.biodiversityproject.org/html/resources/publicopinionresearch.htm
5. Bennet, J., Lubben, F., Hogarth, S. and Campbell, B. 2005. A systematic review of the use of small-group discussions in science teaching with students aged 11-18, and their effects on students' understanding in science or attitude to science, York: Department of Educational Studies Research Paper, University of York.
6. Ben-zvi-Assarf, O. and Orion, N. 2005. A study of junior high students' perceptions of the water cycle. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(4): 366-373.
7. Boon, H.J. 2010. Climate change? Who knows? A comparison of secondary students and pre-service teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(1): 104-120.
8. Boyes, E., Stanisstreet, M. and Papantoniou, V. 1999. The ideas of Greek high school students about the 'Ozone Layeri'. Science Education, 83: 724-737.
9. Bozkurt, O. and Kaya, O.N. 2008. Teaching about ozone layer depletion in Turkey: Pedagogical content knowledge of science teachers. Public Understanding of Science, 17: 271-276.
10. Christensen, J.H., Hewitson, B., Busuioc, A., Chen, A., Gao, X., Held, I.Jones, R. 2007. "Regional climate projections". In Climate change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Edited by: Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K.B., Tignor, M. and Miller, H.L. 848-940. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Clover, D. 2002. Traversing the gap: Concientización, educative-activism in environmental adult education. Environmental Education Research, 8(3): 315-323.
12. Courtenay-Hall, P. and Rogers, L. 2002. Gaps in mind: Problems in environmental knowledge-behaviour modeling research. Environmental Education Research, 8(3): 282-297.
13. Daskolia, M., Flogaitis, E. and Papageorgiou, E. 2006. Kindergarten teachers' conceptual framework on the ozone layer depletion: Exploring the associative meanings of a global environmental issue. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(2): 168-178.
14. Dickerson, D.L., Penick, J.E., Dawkins, K.R. and Van Sickle, M. 2007. Groundwater in science education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18: 45-61.
15. Ewert, A. and Galloway, G. 2009. Socially desirable responding in an environment context. Environmental Education Research, 15(1): 55-70.
16. Falk, J.H., Storksdieck, M. and Dierking, L.D. 2007. Investigating public science interest and understanding: Evidence for the importance of free-choice learning. Public Understanding of Science, 16: 455-469.
17. Farrell, M. 2010. Nuclear waste storage in limbo as Obama axes Yucca Mountain funds. Christian Science Monitor. http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2010/0201/Nuclear-waste-storage-in-limbo-as-Obama-axes-Yucca-Mountain-funds (accessed February 1, 2010).
18. Forster, P., Ramaswamy, V., Artaxo, P., Berntsen, T., Betts, R., Fahey, D.W., Haywood, J., Lean, J., Lowe, D.C., Myhre, G., Nganga, J., Prinn, R., Raga, G., Schulz, M. and Van Dorland, R. 2007. "Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing". In Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, Edited by: Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K.B., Tignor, M. and Miller, H.L. 136Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Gallup Organisation. 2010. Attitudes of Europeans toward the issues of biodiversity: Analytical report, Wave 2. Flash Eurobarometer 290. Requested by the European Commision.ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/flash/fl_290_en.pdf
20. Grima, G., Filho, W.L. and Pace, P. 2010. Perceived frameworks of young people on global warming and ozone deplection. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 9(1): 35-39.
21. Grossman, D. 2009. Parsing global climate change polls. Public Radio International: The World. http://www.theworld.org/2009/12/16/parsing-global-climate-change-polls/ (accessed December 18, 2010).
22. Hansen, J. 2007. Testimony before the Iowa Utility Board.http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Climate_impacts_of_coal_plants
23. Heimlich, J.E. and Ardoin, N.M. 2008. Understanding behavior to understand behavior change: A literature review. Environmental Education Research, 14(3): 215-237.
24. Hines, J.E., Hungerford, H.R. and Tomera, A.N. 1986-1987. Analysis and synthesis of research in responsible environmental behaviour: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2): 1-8.
25. Hungerford, H.R. and Volk, T.L. 1990. Changing learner behaviour through environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 21(3): 8-21.
26. Khalid, T. 2003. Pre-service high school teachers' perceptions of three environmental phenomena. Environmental Education Research, 9(1): 35-50.
27. Kentucky Environmental Education Council. 1999. The 1999 survey of Kentuckians' environmental knowledge, attitudes and behaviors, Frankfort, KY: University of Kentucky Survey Research Center.
28. Kentucky Environmental Education Council. 2005. The 2004 survey of Kentuckians' environmental knowledge, attitudes and behaviors, Frankfort, KY: University of Kentucky Survey Research Center. http://keec.ky.gov/documents/2004environmentalsurvey12705.pdf
29. Kentucky Environmental Education Council. 2009. The 2009 survey of Kentuckians' environmental knowledge, attitudes and behaviors, Frankfort, KY: University of Kentucky Survey Research Center. http://keec.ky.gov/documents/2009environmentalsurvey.pdf
30. Kerger, S., Martin, R. and Brunner, M. 2011. How can we enhance girls' interest in scientific topics?. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 4: 1-23.
31. Kingsolver, B. 2010. Water is life: Fresh water. National Geographic, 217(4): 36-49.
32. Kollmus, A. and Agyeman, J. 2002. Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behaviour?. Environmental Education Research, 8(3): 239-260.
33. Leighton, J.P. and Bisanz, G.L. 2003. Children's and adults' knowledge and models of reasoning about the ozone layer and its depletion. International Journal of Science Education, 25(1): 117-139.
34. Leiserowitz, A., Smith, N. and Marlon, J.R. 2010. Americans' knowledge of climate change, New Haven, CT: Yale University, Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. http://environment.yale.edu/climate/files/ClimateChangeKnowledge2010.pdf
35. Louisiana Department of Natural Resources. 2002. Louisiana Roper ASW study environmental attitudes and knowledge survey.http://dnr.louisiana.gov/enviroquiz1.ssi
36. Michail, S., Stamou, A.G. and Stamou, G.P. 2006. Greek primary school teachers' understanding of current environmental issues: An exploration of their environmental knowledge and images of nature. Science Education, 91(2): 244-259.
37. Mohan, L., Chen, J. and Anderson, C.W. 2009. Developing a multi-year learning progression for carbon cycling in socio-ecological systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46: 675-698.
38. Murphy, Patricia and Whitelegg, Elizabeth. 2006. Girls in the physics classroom: a review of the research on the participation of girls in physics, London: Institute of Physics.
39. Murphy, T.P. 2002. The Minnesota report card on environmental literacy: A benchmark survey of adult environmental knowledge, attitudes and behavior, St Paul, MN: Minnesota Office of Environmental Assistance. http://www.seek.state.mn.us/eemn_b.cfm
40. Murphy, T.P. 2004. The second Minnesota report card on environmental literacy: A survey of adult environmental knowledge, attitudes and behavior, St Paul, MN: Minnesota Office of Environmental Assistance. http://www.seek.state.mn.us/eemn_b.cfm
41. Murphy, T.P. and Olson, A. 2008. The third Minnesota report card on environmental literacy: A survey of adult environmental knowledge, attitudes and behavior, St Paul, MN: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. http://www.seek.state.mn.us/eemn_b.cfm
42. National Environmental Education & Training Foundation (NEETF). 1997. The national report card on environmental knowledge, attitudes and behaviors, Washington, DC: National Environmental Education & Training Foundation and Roper Starch Worldwide. http://www.neefusa.org/resources/publications.htm
43. National Environmental Education and Training Foundation (NEETF). 1998. The national report card on environmental knowledge, attitudes and behaviors, Washington, DC: National Environmental Education & Training Foundation and Roper Starch Worldwide. http://www.neefusa.org/resources/publications.htm
44. National Environmental Education and Training Foundation(NEETF). 1999a. The national report card on environmental readiness for the 21st century, Washington, DC: The National Environmental Education & Training Foundation (NEETF) and Roper Starch Worldwide. www.neefusa.org/resources/publications.htm
45. National Environmental Education and Training Foundation (NEETF). 1999b. The national report card on safe drinking water knowledge, attitudes and behaviors, Washington, DC: The National Environmental Education & Training Foundation (NEETF), & Roper Starch Worldwide.
46. National Environmental Education and Training Foundation (NEETF). 2001. Lessons from the environment: The ninth annual national report card on environmental attitudes, knowledge, and behavior, Washington, DC: National Environmental Education and Training Foundation and Roper Starch Worldwide. http://www.neefusa.org/resources/publications.htm
47. National Environmental Education and Training Foundation (NEETF). 2002. Americans' low 'Energy IQ:' A risk to our energy future; The tenth annual national report card: Energy knowledge, attitudes, and behavior, Washington, DC: National Environmental Education & Training Foundation and Roper ASW. http://www.neefusa.org/resources/publications.htm
48. National Environmental Education and Training Foundation (NEETF). 2005. Environmental literacy in America: What ten years of NEETF/roper research studies say about environmental literacy in the US, Washington, DC: Author. http://www.neefusa.org/resources/publications.htm
49. Nebraska Alliance for Conservation, Environment Education. 2003. Nebraska conservation and environment literacy and awareness survey, Lincoln, NE: Bureau of Sociological Research, University of Nebraska-Lincoln. http://www.nacee.org/downloads1.html
50. Papadimitriou, V. 2004. Prospective primary teachers' understanding of climate change, greenhouse effect, and ozone layer depletion. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11(2): 299-307.
51. Pekel, F.O. 2005. High school students' and trainee science teachers' perceptions of ozone depletion. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 7(1): 12-21.
52. Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. 2000. Pennsylvania environmental readiness for the Null century, Harrisburg, PA: Pennsylvania Null Environment Commission. http://www.pcee.org/Research/Research_21stF_FindPAEnvLiteracy.pdf
53. Penn, A. 2003. Nebraska conservation and environment literacy and awareness survey, methodology report: Designs, procedures, and instruments. Bureau of Sociological Research, Sociology Department, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.http://www.nacee.org/downloads1.html
54. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. 2009. Modest support for 'Cap and Trade' policy: Fewer Americans see solid evidence of global warming. October 22. http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1386/cap-and-trade-global-warming-opinion (accessed January 4, 2010).
55. Purcell, K., L. Rainie, A. Mitchell, T. Rosenstiel, and K. Olmstead. 2010. Pew internet and American life project: Understanding the participatory news consumer. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Online-News.aspx (accessed March 1, 2010).
56. Rebich, S. and Gautier, C. 2005. Concept mapping to reveal prior knowledge and change and a mock summit course on global climate change. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(4): 355-365.
57. Reinfried, S. 2006. Conceptual change in physical geography and environmental sciences through mental model building: The example of groundwater. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 15(1): 41-61.
58. Resnick, L.B. 1983. Mathematics and science learning: A new conception. Science, 220: 477-478.
59. Robelia, B.A. 2008. Investigating the impact of adding an environmental focus to a developmental chemistry class. PhD diss., University of Minnesota.http://proquest.umi.com
60. Robelia, B., McNeill, K., Wammer, K. and Lawrenz, F. 2010. Investigating the impact of adding an environmental focus to developmental chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(2): 216-220.
61. Sterman, J.D. and Sweeney, L.B. 2007. Understanding public complacency about climate change: Adults' mental models of climate change violate conservation of matter. Climatic Change, 80: 213-238.
62. Sturgis, P. and Allum, N. 2004. Science in society: Re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public Understanding of Science, 13: 55-74.
63. Summers, M., Kruger, C., Childs, A. and Mant, G. 2000. Primary school teachers' understanding of environmental issues: An interview study. Environmental Education Research, 6(4): 293-312.
64. Summers, M., Kruger, C., Childs, A. and Mant, G. 2001. Understanding the science of environmental issues: Development of a subject knowledge guide for primary teacher education. International Journal of Science Education, 23(1): 33-53.
65. Suvedi, M., Krueger, D., Shrestha, A. and Bettinghouse, D. 2000. Michigan citizens' knowledge and perceptions about groundwater. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31(2): 16-21.
66. UNESCO. 1977. Tbilisi Declaration. Intergovernmental Conference on Environmental Education.www.gdrc.org/uem/ee/EE-Tbilisi_1977.pdf
67. United Nations. 2007. International decade for action: Water for life 2005-2015. Water scarcity.http://www.un.org/waterforlifedecade/scarcity.html
68. US Energy Information Administration. 2010a. Electricity explained: Electricity in the United States.http://www.eia.doe.gov/energyexplained/index.cfm?page=electricity_in_the_united_states
69. US Energy Information Administration. 2010b. Pennsylvania nuclear profile.http://www.eia.gov/cneaf/nuclear/state_profiles/pennsylvania/PA.html
70. US Energy Information Administration. 2010c. Nebraska nuclear profile.http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/nuclear/state_profiles/nebraska/ne.html
71. US Energy Information Administration. 2010d. Minnesota nuclear profile.http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/nuclear/state_profiles/minnesota/mn.html
72. US Environmental Protection Agency. 2009. Climate change-regulatory initiatives: Endangerment and cause or contribute findings for greenhouse gases under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act.http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/endangerment.html
73. White, L. A. 2006. Environmental literacy and distance learning: A window to the future of education in Ontario. MS diss., Athabasca University.http://auspace.athabascau.ca:8080/dspace/handle/2149/569
74. Woodward, C. 2009. Homeless nuclear waste. Christian Science Monitor. http://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/2009/0915/homeless-nuclear-waste (accessed September 15, 2010).
75. Yavetz, B., Goldman, D. and Pe'er, S. 2009. Environmental literacy of pre-service teachers in Israel: A comparison between students at the onset and end of their studies. Environmental Education Research, 15(40): 393-415.