Supplier evaluation and selection: A hybrid model based on DEAHP and ABC

International Journal of Production Research

Volumn 50, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 1877-1889

  Zhang, Xiaojin ^a   Lee, C K M ^a   Chen, Songlin ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

activity based costing; data envelopment analytic hierarchy process; single objective model; supplier selection

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITY BASED COSTING; DATA ENVELOPMENT; DELIVERY PERFORMANCE; ELECTRONICS MANUFACTURING; FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS; HYBRID METHOD; HYBRID METHODOLOGIES; HYBRID MODEL; INDIRECT COSTS; ORDER QUANTITY; OVERALL EFFICIENCY; SINGLE OBJECTIVE; SUPPLIER EVALUATIONS; SUPPLIER SELECTION;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS;

COST ACCOUNTING;

EID: 84861406870     PISSN: 00207543     EISSN: 1366588X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2011.560908     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Aissaoui, N., Haouari, M., and Hassini, E., 2007. Supplier selection and order lot sizing modeling: A review. Computers & Operations Research, 34, 3516-3540.
2. Braglia, M. and Petroni, A., 2000. A quality assurance-oriented methodology for handling trade-offs in supplier selection. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 30 (2), 96-111.
3. Chan, F.T.S. and Kumar, N., 2007. Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach. Omega, 35 (4), 417-431.
4. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., and Rhodes, E., 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2 (6), 429-444.
5. Cooper, R., 1988a. The rise of activity-based costing - Part one: What is an activity-based cost system?. Journal of Cost Management, Summer 1988a, 45-54.
6. Cooper, R., 1988b. The rise of activity-based costing - Part two: When do I need an activity-based cost system?. Journal of Cost Management, Fall 1988b, 41-58.
7. de Boer, L., et al., 2001. A review of methods supporting supplier selection. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 7 (2), 75-89.
8. Drury, C., 1992. Management and cost accounting. London: Chapman and Hall.
9. Innes, J. and Mitchell, F., 1993. A review of activity-based costing practice. In: C. Drury, ed. Management accounting handbook. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd, 36-63.
10. Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., and Ulukan, Z., 2003. Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP. Logistics Information Management, 16 (6), 382-394.
11. Narasimhan, R., Talluri, S., and Mendez, D., 2001. Supplier evaluation and rationalisation via data envelopment analysis: An empirical examination. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 37 (3), 28-37.
12. Ramanathan, R., 2006. Data envelopment analysis for weight derivation and aggregation in the analytic hierarchy process. Computers and Operations Research, 33 (5), 1289-1307.
13. Roodhooft, F. and Konings, J., 1996. Vendor selection and evaluation an activity based costing approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 96 (1), 97-102.
14. Saaty, T.L., 1980. The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting and resource allocation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
15. Saen, R.F., 2007. A new mathematical approach for supplier selection: Accounting for non-homogeneity is important. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 185 (1), 84-95.
16. Saen, R.F., 2008. Supplier selection by the new AR-IDEA model. International Journal Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 39, 1061-1070.
17. Sevkli, M., et al., 2007. An application of data envelopment analytic hierarchy process for supplier selection: A case study of BEKO in Turkey. International Journal of Production Research, 45 (9), 1973-2003.
18. Suresh Babu, T.K. and Sharma, K., 2005. Analytical hierarchy process for vendor evaluation - A case with a research institute. South Asian Journal of Management, 12 (1), 101-105.
19. Tam, M.C.Y. and Rao Tummala, V.M., 2001. An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system. Omega, 29, 171-182.
20. Wang, G., Huang, S.H., and Dismukes, J.P., 2004. Product-driven supply chain selection using integrated multi-criteria decisionmaking methodology. International Journal of Production Economics, 91 (1), 1-15.
21. Weber, C.A., Current, J.R., and Benton, W.C., 1991. Vendor selection criteria and methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 50, 2-18.
22. Weber, C.A. and Ellram, L.M., 1993. Supplier selection using multi-objective programming: A decision support systems approach. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 23 (2), 3-14.
23. Wu, D., Yang, Z., and Liang, L., 2006. Using DEA-neural network approach to evaluate branch efficiency of a large Canadian bank. Expert Systems with Applications, 31 (1), 108-115.
24. Wu, T., et al., 2007. AIDEA: A methodology for supplier evaluation and selection in a supplier-based manufacturing environment. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, 11 (2), 174-192.
25. Wu, T. and Blackhurst, J., 2009. Supplier evaluation and selection: An augmented DEA approach. International Journal of Production Research, 47 (16), 4593-4608.