A heuristic approach on the facility layout problem based on game theory

International Journal of Production Research

Volumn 50, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1512-1527

  Navidi, Hamidreza ^a   Bashiri, Mahdi ^a   Messi Bidgoli, Masume ^a  

^a SHAHED UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Bertrand competition; facility layout design; game theory; material handling system design; simulated annealing

Indexed keywords

A PLANTS; BERTRAND COMPETITION; DECISION MAKERS; FACILITY LAYOUT; FACILITY LAYOUT DESIGN; FACILITY LAYOUT PROBLEMS; HEURISTIC APPROACH; LAYOUT DESIGNS; MATERIAL HANDLING SYSTEMS; METAHEURISTIC; MULTI OBJECTIVE; NUMERICAL EXAMPLE; OPTIMISATIONS; SCORE FUNCTION; WEIGHTED SUM;

DESIGN; GAME THEORY; HEURISTIC METHODS; INDUSTRY; MATERIALS HANDLING; MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT; SIMULATED ANNEALING; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

PLANT LAYOUT;

EID: 84861379648     PISSN: 00207543     EISSN: 1366588X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2010.550638     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Aiello, G., Enea, M., and Galante, G., 2006. A multi-objective approach on facility layout problem by genetic search algorithm and Electre method. Robotic and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 22 (5-6), 447-455.
2. Alvarenga, A.G., Negreiros-Goms, F.J., and Mestria, M., 2000. Meta-heuristic methods for a class of the facility layout problem. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 11 (2), 421-430.
3. Chen, C.W. and Sha, D.Y., 2005. Heuristic approach for solving the multi-objective facility layout problem. International Journal of Production Research, 43 (21), 4493-4507.
4. Co, H.C., Wu, A., and Reisman, A., 1989. A throughput-maximizing facility planning and layout model. International Journal of Production Research, 27 (1), 1-12.
5. Devise, O. and Pierreval, A., 2000. Indicators for measuring performances of morphology and materials handling systems. International Journal of Production Economics, 64 (1-3), 209-218.
6. Drira, A., Pierreval, H., and Hajri-Gabouj, S., 2007. Facility layout problems: A survey. Annual Reviews in Control, 31 (2), 255-267.
7. El-Baz, M.A., 2004. A genetic algorithm for facility layout problems of different manufacturing environments. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 47 (2-3), 233-246.
8. Farahat, A. and Perakis, G., 2008. A comparison of price and quantity competition in oligopolies with differentiated products. New York: Research paper, series: 7-08. Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University.
9. Fruggiero, F., Lambiase, A. and Negri, F., 2006. Design and optimization of a facility layout problem in virtual environment. In: Proceedings of ICAD, 2006, 13-16 June 2006, Firenze, Italy, 1/7-7/7.
10. Harmonosky, C.M. and Tothero, G.K., 1992. A multi-factor plant layout methodology. International Journal of Production Research, 30 (8), 1773-1789.
11. Hassan, M.M.D., 1994. Machine layout problem in modern manufacturing facilities. International Journal of Production Research, 32 (11), 2559-2584.
12. Heragu, S.S. and Alfa, A.S., 1992. Experimental analysis of simulated annealing based algorithms for the layout problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 57 (2), 190-202.
13. Islier, A., 1998. A general algorithm approach for multiple criteria facility layout design. International Journal of Production Research, 36 (6), 1549-1569.
14. Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C.D., and Vecchi, M.P., 1983. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science, 220 (4598), 671-80.
15. Krishnan, K.K., et al., 2005. Integrated facility layout for heterogonous material handling systems hybrid genetic algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 35th international conference on computers and industrial engineering, 19-22 June 2005, Istanbul Turkey, 1209-1214.
16. Lee, Y.H. and Lee, M.H., 2002. A shape-based block layout approach to facility layout problem using hybrid genetic algorithm. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 42 (2), 237-248.
17. Rosenblatt, M.J., 1979. The facility layout problem: A multi-goal approach. International Journal of Production Research, 17 (4), 323-332.
18. Shayan, E. and Chittilappilly, A., 2004. Genetic algorithm for facilities layout problems based on slicing tree structure. International Journal of Production Research, 42 (19), 4055-4067.
19. Singh, S.P. and Singh, V.K., 2010. An improved heuristic approach for multi-objective facility layout problem. International Journal of Production Research, 48 (4), 1171-1194.
20. Singh, S.P. and Singh, V.K., 2011. Three-level AHP-based heuristic approach for a multi-objective facility layout problem. International Journal of Production Research, 49 (4), 1105-1125.
21. Tompkins, J.A., et al., 2003. Facilities planning. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
22. Tsay, A.A. and Agrawal, N., 2000. Channel dynamics under price and service competition. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2 (4), 372-391.
23. Vollmann, T.E. and Buffa, E.S., 1966. The facilities layout problem in perspective. Management Science, 12 (10), 450-468.
24. Wilhelm, M.R. and Ward, T.L., 1987. Solving quadratic assignment problems by simulated annealing. IIE Transactions, 19 (1), 107-119.
25. Zaho, C. and Wu, Z., 2000. A genetic algorithm for manufacturing cell formation with multiple routes and multiple objectives. International Journal of Production Research, 41 (5), 1045-1056.