Gameplay as a source of intrinsic motivation for individuals in need of ankle training or rehabilitation

Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 69-84

  Nilsson, Niels Christian ^a   Serafin, Stefania ^a   Nordahl, Rolf ^a  

^a AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATIONS; GAMEPLAY; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; LONG-TERM EFFECTS; QUANTITATIVE TESTS;

MOTIVATION;

EID: 84861371739     PISSN: 10547460     EISSN: 15313263     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/PRES_a_00090     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Alankus, G., Lazar, A., May, M., & Kelleher, C. (2010). Towards customizable games for stroke rehabilitation. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2113-2122).
2. Asp, S. E., Halldòrsdòttir, K. Ò., Hägg, C., Møller, M. L., Mickelsson, B. P., Boldt, L., & Skaarup, D. (2007). WobbleActive. Proceedings of the 1st International Sympo-sium on Ludic Engagement Design for All, LEDA 2007. Esbjerg, Denmark: Aalborg University Esbjerg.
3. Deutsch, J. E., Latonio, J., Burdea, G. C., & Boian, R. (2001). Post-stroke rehabilitation with the Rutgers Ankle System: A case study. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 10(4), 416-430.
4. Febretti, A., & Garzotto, F. (2009). Usability, playability, and long-term engagement in computer games. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 4063-4068).
5. Girone, M. J., Burdea, G. C., & Bouzit, M. (1999). The Rutgers Ankle orthopedic rehabilitation interface. Proceedings of the ASME, Dynamic Systems and Control Division, 67, 305-312.
6. Guillaume, D., & Jouvelot, P. (2005). Motivation-driven edu-cational game design: Applying best practices to music education. Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGCHI International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (pp. 462-465).
7. Gulliksen, J., Göransson, B., Boivie, I., Blomkvist, S., Persson, J., & Cajander, Å (2003). Key principles for user-centred systems design. Behaviour & Information Technology, 22(6), 397-409.
8. Holbrook, M. B., Chestnut, R. W., Oliva, T. A., & Greenleaf, E. A. (1984). Play as a consumption experience: The roles of emotions, performance, and personality in the enjoyment of games. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(2), 728-739.
9. Images SI Inc. (2010). One-directional flex sensors, FLX-03. Retrieved from http://www.imagesco.com/sensors/flex-sensor.html.
10. Järvinen, A. (2008). Understanding video games as emotional experiences. In B. Perron & M. J. Wolf (Eds.), The video game theory reader 2 (pp. 85-108). New York: Routledge.
11. Kasunic, M. (2005). Designing an effective survey. Technical report, Handbook CMU/SEI-2005-HB-004, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
12. Kubovy, M. (1999). On pleasures of the mind. In D. Kahne-man, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 134-154). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
13. Maclean, N., & Pound, P. (2000). A critical review of the concept of patient motivation in the literature on physical rehabilitation. Social Science & Medicine, 50(4), 495-506.
14. McGuine, T. A., & Keene, J. S. (2006). The effect of a balance training program on the risk of ankle sprains in high school athletes. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 34(7), 1103-1111.
15. McKeon, P. O., & Mattacola, C. G. (2008). Interventions for the prevention of first time and recurrent ankle sprains. Clinics in Sports Medicine, 27, 371-382.
16. Munih, M., Novak, D., Milavec, M., Ziherl, J., Olenšek, A., & Mihelj, M. (2011). River multimodal scenario for rehabilitation robotics. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (pp. 1-6).
17. Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2005). The concept of flow. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of posi-tive psychology (pp. 89-105). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
18. Nielsen, J. (2000). Why you only need to test with five users. Retrieved from http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20000319.html
19. Phidgets Inc. (2010). PhidgetAccelerometer 3-Axis. Retrieved from http://www.phidgets.com/products.php?product_id=1059
20. Ryan, R. M., Mims, V., & Koestner, R. (1983). Relation of reward contingency and interpersonal context to intrinsic motivation: A review and test using cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(4), 736-750.
21. Saariluoma, P. (2005). Explanatory frameworks for interaction design. In A. Pirhonen, H. Isomäki, C. Roast, & P. Saari-luoma (Eds.), Future Interaction Design (pp. 69-83). Berlin: Springer.
22. Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Sánchez, J. L., Iranzo, R. M., & Vela, F. L. (2011). Enriching evaluation in video games. In P. Campos, N. Graham, J. Jorge, N. Nunes, P. Palanque, & M. Winckler (Eds.), Human-Computer Interaction, INTERACT 2011 (pp. 519-522).
24. Wester, J. U., Jespersen, S., Nielsen, K., & Neumann, L. (1996). Wobble board training after partial sprains of the lateral ligaments of the ankle: A prospective randomized study. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 23(5),332-336.