A pilot study of a crossover trial with randomized use of ankle-foot orthoses for people with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease

Clinical Rehabilitation

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 534-544

  Phillips, Margaret F ^a,b   Robertson, Zoe ^c   Killen, Brian ^d   White, Barney ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL DERBY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c BARNSLEY DISTRICT GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d The National Rehabilitation Hospital   (Ireland)

^e SANDWELL AND WEST BIRMINGHAM HOSPITALS NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Charcot Marie Tooth disease; gait analysis; hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy; orthoses; randomized trial; walking

Indexed keywords

POLYPROPYLENE; SILICONE DERIVATIVE;

AGED; ANKLE; ARTICLE; BRACE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FOOT; HEREDITARY MOTOR SENSORY NEUROPATHY; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PILOT STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

AGED; ANKLE; BRACES; CHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH DISEASE; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FOOT; GAIT DISORDERS, NEUROLOGIC; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PILOT PROJECTS; POLYPROPYLENES; SILICONES;

EID: 84861325147     PISSN: 02692155     EISSN: 14770873     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0269215511426802     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Reilly MM, Hanna MG. Genetic neuromuscular disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002 ; 73 (Suppl II). ii12 - ii21
2. Sabir M, Lyttle D. Pathogenesis of pes cavus in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983 ; 175: 173-78
3. Teunissen LL, Notermans NC, Franssen H, et al. Disease course of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2: a 5-year follow-up study. Arch Neurol. 2003 ; 60: 823-28
4. Alexander IJ, Johnson KA. Assessment and management of pes cavus in Charcot-Marie-tooth disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 ; 246: 273-81
5. Arnold A, McEntagert M, Younger DS. Psychosocial issues that face patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: the role of genetic counselling. J Genetic Counselling. 2005 ; 14: 307-18
6. Vinci P, Gargiulo P. Poor compliance with ankle-foot-orthoses in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2008 ; 44: 27-31
7. From surgical appliances to orthotics-towards an effective service. London: BSRM ; 1999:
8. Sackley C, Disler PB, Turner-Stokes L, et al. Rehabilitation interventions for foot drop in neuromuscular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 ; (2). CD003908
9. Farmer SE, Pearce G, Whittall J, Quinlivan RCM, Patrick JH. The use of stock orthoses to assist gait in neuromuscular disorders: a pilot study. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2006 ; 30: 145-54
10. Kiresuk TJ, Sherman RE. Goal attainment scaling: A general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs. Community Ment Health J. 1968 ; 4: 443-53
11. Turner-Stokes L. Goal attainment scaling (GAS) in rehabilitation: a practical guide. Clin Rehabil. 2009 ; 23: 362-70
12. Guyatt GH, Townsend M, Berman LB, Keller JL. A comparison of Likert and visual analogue scales for measuring change in function. J Chronic Dis. 1987 ; 40: 1129-33
13. Chen MJ, Fan X, Moe ST. Criterion-related validity of the Borg ratings of perceived exertion scale in healthy individuals: a meta-analysis. J Sports Sci. 2002 ; 20: 873-99
14. Borg J Borg's Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales. Leeds: Human Kinetics ; 1998:
15. Nouri FM, Lincoln NB. An Extended Activities of Daily Living Index for stroke patients. Clin Rehabil. 1987 ; 1: 301-05
16. Harwood RH, Ebrahim S. Validity of the Extended Activities of Daily Living scale. Clin Rehabil. 2002 ; 8: 275-80
17. Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JL, Gayton D. Measuring balance in the elderly: preliminary development of an instrument. Physiotherapy Canada. 1989 ; 41: 304-11
18. Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JL, Gayton D. Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument. Canadian J Public Health. 1992 ; S2: s7 - s11
19. Whittle M Gait analysis: an introduction. 4 th edn.University of Michigan: Butterworth Heinemann, 2007. University of Michigan: Butterworth Heinemann ; 2007:
20. Churchill AJG, Halligan PW, Wade DT. Relative contribution of footwear to the efficacy of ankle-foot orthoses. Clin Rehabil. 2003 ; 17: 553-57
21. Cardol M, De Haan RJ, De Jong BA, Van den bos GAM, De Groot IJM. Psychometric properties of the impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 ; 82: 210-16
22. Kersten P, Cardol M, George S, Ward C, Sibley A, White B. Validity of the impact on participation and autonomy questionnaire: A comparison between two countries. Disabil Rehabil. 2007 ; 19: 1502-09
23. The National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel updated staging system. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (updated 2007) Available from: www.npuap.org/pr2.htm
24. Vinci P, Paolini M, Ioppolo F, Gargiulo P, Santilli V. Gait analysis in a patient with severe Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: a case study with a new orthotic device for foot drop. Euro J Phys Rehabil Med. 2010 ; 46: 355-61
25. Taylor D, Stretton CM, Mudge S, Garrett N. Does clinic-measured gait speed differ from gait speed measured in the community in people with stroke?. Clin Rehabil. 2006 ; 20: 438-44
26. Langlois JA, Keyl PM, Guralnik JM, et al. Characteristics of older pedestrians who have difficulty crossing the street. Am J Pub Health. 1997 ; 87: 393-97
27. Goldie P, Matyas T, Evans O. Deficit and change in gait velocity during rehabilitation after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 ; 77: 1074-82
28. The Design of Pedestrian Crossings, Local transport note 2/95 (Third impression 2005).
29. Bohannon R. Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20-79 years: reference values and determinants. Age Ageing. 1997 ; 26: 15-9
30. Guillebastre B, Calmels P, Rougier PR. Assessment of appropriate ankle-foot orthoses models for patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Am J Phys Rehabil Med. 2011 ; 90: 619-27
31. Phillips MF, Radford KA, Wills A. Ankle-foot orthoses for people with Charcot Marie Tooth disease-views of users and orthotists on important aspects of use. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011 ; 6: 491-99