The effect of the use of a walkway and the choice of the foot on plantar pressure assessment when using pressure platforms

Foot

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 100-104

  Naemi, Roozbeh ^a   Chevalier, Thierry Larose ^a   Healy, Aoife ^a   Chockalingam, Nachiappan ^a  

^a STAFFORDSHIRE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Data collection protocol; Plantar pressure; Prescribing orthoses; Pressure plate; Stepping preference; Walkway

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CONTACT ANGLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA COLLECTION METHOD; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GAIT; GROUND REACTION FORCE; HUMAN; LEG MOVEMENT; MALE; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; NORMAL HUMAN; PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE; PLANTAR PRESSURE; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WALKING;

ADULT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FOOT; HUMANS; MALE; ORTHOTIC DEVICES; PRESSURE; REFERENCE VALUES; WALKING;

EID: 84861227457     PISSN: 09582592     EISSN: 15322963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foot.2012.01.004     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bus S.A., Ulbrecht J.S., Cavanagh P.R. Pressure relief and load redistribution by custom-made insoles in diabetic patients with neuropathy and foot deformity. Clinical Biomechanics 2004, 19:629-638.
2. Semple R., Turner D.E., Helliwell P.S., Woodburn J. Regionalised centre of pressure analysis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clinical Biomechanics 2007, 22:127-129.
3. Rosenbaum D., Becker H.P. Plantar pressure distribution measurements. Technical background and clinical applications. Foot & Ankle Surgery 1997, 3:1-14.
4. Bus S.A., de Lange A. A comparison of the 1-step, 2-step, and 3-step protocols for obtaining barefoot plantar pressure data in the diabetic neuropathic foot. Clinical Biomechanics 2005, 20:892-899.
5. McPoil T.G., Cornwall M.W., Dupuis L., Cornwell M. Variability of plantar pressure data. A comparison of the two-step and midgait methods. Journal of American Podiatric Medical Association 1999, 89:495-501.
6. Wearing S.C., Urry S., Smeathers J.E., Battistutta D. A comparison of gait initiation and termination methods for obtaining plantar foot pressures. Gait & Posture 1999, 10:255-263.
7. Putti A.B., Arnold G.P., Cochrane L.A., Abboud R.J. Normal pressure values and repeatability of the Emed1 ST4 system. Gait & Posture 2008, 27:501-505.
8. Wearing S.C., Urry S.R., Smeathers J.E. The effect of visual targeting on ground reaction force and temporospatial parameters of gait. Clinical Biomechanics 2000, 15:583-591.
9. Bates B.T., Dufek J.S., Davis Hp. The effect of trial size on statistical power. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise 1992, 24:1059-1068.
10. Jian Y., Winter D.A., Ishac M.G., Gilchrist L. Trajectory of the body COG and COP during initiation and termination of gait. Gait & Posture 1993, 1:9-22.
11. Miller C.A., Verstraete M.C. Determination of the step duration of gait initiation using a mechanical energy analysis. Journal of Biomechanics 1996, 29:1195-1199.
12. Perneger T.V. What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. British Medical Journal 1998, 316:1236-1238.
13. Maetzler M., Bochdansky T., Abboud R.J. Normal pressure values and repeatability of the Emed1 ST2 system. Gait and Posture 2010, 32:391-394.
14. Vanzant R.S., Mcpoil T.G., Cornwall M.W. Symmetry of plantar pressures and vertical forces in healthy subjects during walking. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association 2001, 91:337-342.
15. Macellari V., Giacomozzi C. A multistep pressure platform as a standalone system for gait assessment. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 1996, 34:299-304.