Re-evaluating visual and auditory dominance through modality switching costs and congruency analyses

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 140, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 111-118

  Sandhu, Rajwant ^a   Dyson, Benjamin J ^a  

^a RYERSON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Audio visual integration; Cross modal congruency; Modality dominance; Modality switching effects; Training

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; VISION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84861212459     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ben-Artzi E., Marks L.E. Visual-auditory interaction in speeded classification: Role of stimulus difference. Perception & Psychophysics 1995, 57(8):1151-1162.
2. Benjamins J.S., van der Smagt M.J., Verstraten F.A. Matching auditory and visual signals: Is sensory modality just another feature?. Perception 2008, 37:848-858.
3. Bermant R.I., Welch R.B. The effect of degree of visual-auditory stimulus separation and eye position upon the spatial interaction of vision and audition. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1976, 43:487-493.
4. Bertelson P., Aschersleben G. Temporal ventriloquism: Cross-modal interaction on the time dimension: 1. Evidence from auditory-visual temporal order judgment. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2003, 50(1-2):147-155.
5. Bhattacharya J., Petsche H. Drawing on mind's canvas: Differences in cortical integration patterns between artists and non-artists. Human Brain Mapping 2005, 26:1-14.
6. Cohen J., MacWhinney B., Flatt M., Provost J. PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 1993, 25:257-271.
7. Colavita F.B. Human sensory dominance. Perception & Psychophysics 1974, 16(2):409-412.
8. Dyson B.J. Trial after trial: General processing consequences as a function of repetition and change in multidimensional sound. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2010, 63:1170-1788.
9. Egner T. Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 2007, 7:380-390.
10. Ernst M.O., Banks M.S. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 2002, 415:429-433.
11. Giard M.H., Peronnet F. Auditory-visual integration during multimodal object recognition in humans: A behavioral and electrophysiological study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1999, 11:473-490.
12. Klemen J., Chambers C.D. Current perspectives and methods in studying neural mechanisms of multisensory interactions. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2012, 36:111-133.
13. Kornblum S., Hasbroucq T., Osman A. Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility: A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review 1990, 97:253-270.
14. Lukas S., Philipp A.M., Koch I. The role of preparation and cue-modality in cross-modal task switching. Acta Psychologica 2010, 134:318-322.
15. Lukas S., Philipp A.M., Koch I. Switching attention between modalities: Further evidence for visual dominance. Psychological Research 2010, 74:255-267.
16. Melera R.D., O'Brien T.P. Interaction between synesthetically corresponding dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 1987, 116(4):323-336.
17. Meredith M.A., Nemitz J.W., Stein B.E. Determinants of multisensory integration in superior colliculus neurons: Temporal factors. Journal of Neuroscience 1987, 7:3215-3229.
18. Mordkoff J.T., Yantis S. An interactive race model of divided attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 1991, 17:520-538.
19. Morein-Zamir S., Soto-Faraco S., Kingstone A. Auditory capture of vision: Examining temporal ventriloquism. Cognitive Brain Research 2003, 17:154-163.
20. Mulligan N.W. The effect of generation on long-term repetition priming in auditory and visual perceptual identification. Acta Psychologica 2011, 137:18-23.
21. Patching G.R., Quinlan P.T. Garner and congruency effects in the speeded classification of bimodal signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 2002, 28:755-775.
22. Pomerantz J.R., Pristach E.A., Carson C.E. Attention and object perception. Object perception: Structure and process 1989, 53-89. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. B. Shepp, S. Ballesteros (Eds.).
23. Posner M.I., Nissen M.J., Klein R.M. Visual dominance: An information processing account of its origins and significance. Psychological Review 1976, 83:157-171.
24. Quinlan P.T. Sequential effects in auditory choice reaction time tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1999, 6:297-303.
25. Quinlan P.T. The 'late' locus of visual dominance. Abstract Psychonomic Society. 2000, 5:64.
26. Radeau M., Bertelson P. The after-effects of ventriloquism. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1974, 26:63-71.
27. Recanzone G.H. Auditory influences on visual temporal rate perception. Journal of Neurophysiology 2003, 89:1078-1093.
28. Roach N.W., Heron J., McGraw P.V. Resolving multisensory conflict: A strategy for balancing the costs and benefits of audio-visual integration. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2006, 273:2159-2168.
29. Rock I., Harris C. Vision and touch. Scientific American 1967, 267:96-104.
30. Schlaug G. The brain of musicians: A model for functional and structural adaptation. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2001, 930:281-299.
31. Shams L., Kamitani Y., Shimojo S. Illusions. What you see is what you hear. Nature 2002, 408:788.
32. Sinnett S., Spence C., Soto-Faraco S. Visual dominance and attention: The Colavita effect revisited. Perception & Psychophysics 2007, 69(5):673-686.
33. Talsma D., Senkowski D., Soto-Faraco S., Woldorff M.G. The multifaceted interplay between attention and multisensory integration. Trends in Cognitive Science 2010, 14:400-410.
34. Tanaka J.W., Curran T. A neural basis for expert object recognition. Psychological Science 2001, 12:43-47.
35. Welch R.B., Warren D.H. Immediate perceptual response to inter-sensory discrepancy. Psychological Bulletin 1980, 88:638-667.
36. Winer B.J. Statistical principles in experimental design 1962, McGraw-Hill, New York.
37. Yuval-Greenberg S., Deouell L. The dog's meow: Asymmetrical interaction in cross-modal object recognition. Experimental Brain Research 2009, 193(4):603-614.
38. Zmigrod S., Hommel B. Auditory event files: Integrating auditory perception and action planning. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2009, 71:352-362.