Violate my beliefs? Then you're to blame! Belief content as an explanation for causal attribution biases

Psychology and Aging

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 324-337

  Blanchard Fields, Fredda ^a   Hertzog, Christopher ^a   Horhota, Michelle ^b  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b FURMAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Aging; Attitudes; Beliefs; Causal attributions

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CAUSAL ATTRIBUTION; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; RELIGION; RESPONSE TIME; RESPONSIBILITY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL BELIEF; TASK PERFORMANCE; WORKING MEMORY; ADOLESCENT; AGE; AGING; ATTITUDE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; DECISION MAKING; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; HUMAN RELATION; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SHORT TERM MEMORY; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; STATISTICAL MODEL; UNCERTAINTY; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AGING; ATTITUDE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; CULTURE; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; GEORGIA; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; RELIGION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; SOCIAL VALUES; UNCERTAINTY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84861206011     PISSN: 08827974     EISSN: 19391498     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0024423     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Bargh, J. A. (1997). The automaticity of everyday life. In R. S. Wyer, Jr. (Ed.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 10, pp. 1-61). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155-162. doi:10.1037/ h0036215
3. Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple significance testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B-Methodological, 57, 289-300.
4. Blanchard-Fields, F. (1994). Age differences in causal attributions from an adult developmental perspective. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Series, 49, P43-P51.
5. Blanchard-Fields, F. (1996). Causal attributions across the adult life span: The influence of social schemas, life context, and domain specificity. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 5137-5146.
6. Blanchard-Fields, F. (1999). Social schematicity and causal attributions. In T. M. Hess & F. Blanchard-Fields (Eds.), Social cognition and aging. San Diego, CA: Academic. doi:10.1016/B978-012345260-3/50011-2
7. Blanchard-Fields, F., & Beatty, C. (2005). Age differences in blame attributions: The role of relationship outcome ambiguity and personal identification. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 60B, P19-P26.
8. Blanchard-Fields, F., Chen, Y., Horhota, M., & Wang, M. (2007). Cross cultural and age differences in the correspondence bias. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 62B, P362-P365.
9. Blanchard-Fields, F., Chen, Y., Schocke, M., & Hertzog, C. (1998). Evidence for content-specificity of causal attributions across the adult life span. Aging, Neuropsychology, & Cognition, 5, 241-263.
10. Blanchard-Fields, F., & Hertzog, C. (2000). Age differences in schematicity. In U. von Hecker, S. Dutke, & G. Sedek (Eds.), Processes of generative mental representation and psychological adaptation. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
11. Blanchard-Fields, F., Hertzog, C., Stein, R., & Pak, R. (2001). Beyond a stereotyped view of older adults' traditional family values. Psychology and Aging, 16, 483-496. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.16.3.483
12. Blanchard-Fields, F., & Horhota, M. (2005). Age differences in the correspondence bias: When a plausible explanation matters. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 60B, P259-P267.
13. Blanchard-Fields, F., & Norris, L. (1994). Causal attributions from adolescence through adulthood: Age differences, ego level, and generalized response style. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 1, 67-86. doi: 10.1080/09289919408251451
14. Blanchard-Fields, F., Suhrer-Roussel, L., & Hertzog, C. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory: Old questions, new answers. Sex Roles, 30, 423-457. doi:10.1007/BF01420602
15. Bosworth, H. B., Parks, K. S., McQuoid, D. R., Hays, J. C., & Steffens, D. C. (2003). The impact of religious practice and religious coping on geriatric depression. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 18, 905-914. doi:10.1002/gps.945
16. Brandt, M. J., & Reyna, C. (2010). The role of prejudice and the need for closure in religious fundamentalism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 715-725. doi:10.1177/0146167210366306
17. Budner, S. (1962). Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. Journal of Personality, 30, 423-457.
18. Chatters, L. M. (2000). Religion and health: Public health research and practice. Annual Review of Public Health, 21, 335-367. doi:10.1146/ annurev.publhealth.21.1.335
19. Chen, Y., & Blanchard-Fields, F. (1997). Age differences in stages of attributional processing. Psychology and Aging, 12, 694-703. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.12.4.694
20. Chen, Y., & Blanchard-Fields, F. (2000). Unwanted thought: Age differences in the correction of social judgments. Psychology and Aging, 15, 475-482. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.15.3.475
21. Cole, D. A., & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 558 -577. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.112.4.558
22. Crowther, M. R., Parker, M. W., Achenbaum, W. A., Larimore, W. L., & Koenig, H. G. (2002). Rowe and Kahn's model of successful aging revisited: Positive spirituality-the forgotten factor. Gerontologist, 42, 613-620.
23. Engle, R. W., Nations, J. K., & Cantor, J. (1990). Is "working memory capacity" just another name for word knowledge? Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 799-804. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.799
24. Epstein, S., Lipson, A., Holstein, C., & Huh, E. (1992). Irrational reactions to negative outcomes: Evidence for two conceptual systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 328-339. doi:10.1037/0022- 3514.62.2.328
25. Fazio, R. H. (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 247-282). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., & Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229-238. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.229
27. Fazio, R. H., & Williams, C. J. (1986). Attitude accessibility as a moderator of the attitude-perception and attitude-behavior relations: An investigation of the 1984 presidential election. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 505-514. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.505
28. Follett, K., & Hess, T. M., (2002). Aging, cognitive complexity, and the fundamental attribution error. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57B, P312-P323.
29. Fry, P. S., & Debats, D. L. (2010). Sources of human life-strengths, resilience, and health. In P. S. Fry & C. L. M. Keys (Eds.), New frontiers in resilient aging: Life-strengths and well-being in late life (pp. 15-59). New York, NY: Cambridge University. doi:10.1017/ CBO9780511763151.003
30. Funder, D. C. (1995). Stereotypes, base rates, and the fundamental evaluation mistake: A content-based approach to judgmental accuracy. In Y. T. Lee, L. Jussim, & C. R. McCauley (Eds.), Stereotype accuracy: Toward appreciating group differences (pp. 141-156). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10495-006
31. George, L. K., Ellison, C. G., & Larson, D. B. (2002). Explaining the relationships between religious involvement and health. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 190-200. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1303_04
32. Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 21-38. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.21
33. Graesser, A., & Clark, L. (1985). Structures and procedures of implicit knowledge. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
34. Hess, T. M. (2001). Ageing-related influences on personal need for structure. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25, 482-490. doi:10.1080/01650250042000429
35. Hess, T. M. (2006). Adaptive aspects of social cognitive functioning in adulthood: Age-related goal and knowledge influences. Social Cognition, 24, 279-309. doi:10.1521/soco.2006.24.3.279
36. Hess, T. M., & Auman, C. (2001). Aging and social expertise: The impact of trait-diagnostic information on impressions of others. Psychology and Aging, 16, 497-510. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.16.3.497
37. Hess, T. M., Emery, L., & Neupert, S. D. (2010, April). The longitudinal relationship between resources, motivation, and age-related changes in cognitive functioning. Paper presented at the Cognitive Aging Conference, Atlanta, GA.
38. Hess, T. M., Germain, C. M., Swaim, E. L., & Osowski, N. L. (2009). Aging and selective engagement: The moderating impact of motivation on older adults' resource utilization. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 64B(4), 447-456. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbp020
39. Hess, T. M., Leclerc, C. M., Swaim, E., & Weatherbee, S. R. (2009). Aging and everyday judgments: The impact of motivational and processing resource factors. Psychology and Aging, 24, 735-740. doi:10.1037/ a0016340
40. Hess, T. M., McGee, K. A., Woodburn, S. M., & Bolstad, C. S. (1998). Age-related priming effects in social judgments. Psychology and Aging, 13, 127-137. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.13.1.127
41. Hess, T. M., Osowski, N. L., & Leclerc, C. M. (2005). Age and experience influences on the complexity of social influences. Psychology and Aging, 20, 447-459, doi:10.1037/0882-7974.20.3.447
42. Hess, T. M., Rosenberg, D., C., & Waters, S. J. (2001). Motivation and representational processes in adulthood: The effects of social accountability and information relevance. Psychology and Aging, 16, 629-642. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.16.4.629
43. Hofer, S. M., Flaherty, B. P., & Hoffmann, L. (2006). Cross-sectional analysis of time-dependent data: Mean-induced association in ageheterogeneous samples and an alternative method based on sequential narrow age-cohort samples. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41, 165- 187. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr4102_4
44. Horhota, M., & Blanchard-Fields, F. (2006). Do beliefs and attributional complexity influence age differences in the correspondence bias? Social Cognition, 24, 310-337. doi:10.1521/soco.2006.24.3.310
45. Jacoby, L. L. (1999). Deceiving the elderly: Effects of accessibility bias in cued-recall performance. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 16, 417-436. doi: 10.1080/026432999380861
46. Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (2003). LISREL 8.54. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
47. Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Exceptions that prove the rule- using a theory of motivated social cognition to account for ideological incongruities and political anomalies: Reply to Greenberg and Jonas. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 383- 393. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.383
48. Jost, J. T., Napier, J. L., Thorisdottir, H., Gosling, S. D., Palfai, T. P., & Ostafin, B. (2007). Are needs to manage uncertainty and threat associated with political conservatism or ideological extremity? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 989 -1007. doi:10.1177/ 0146167207301028
49. Klaczynski, P. A., & Robinson, B. (2000). Personal theories, intellectual ability, and epistemological beliefs: Adult age differences in everyday reasoning biases. Psychology and Aging, 15, 400-416. doi:10.1037/ 0882-7974.15.3.400
50. Koenig, H. G., Smiley, M., & Gonzales, J. P. (1988). Religion, health, and aging: A review and theoretical integration. New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
51. Krosnick, J. A., & Petty, R. E. (1995). Attitude strength: An overview. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 1-24). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. Kruglanski, A. W., & Freund, T. (1983). The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping and numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 448-468. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(83)90022-7
53. Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: "Seizing" and "freezing". Psychological Review, 103, 263-283. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.2.263
54. Levinson, D. J., & Huffman, P. E. (1955). Traditional family ideology and its relation to personality. Journal of Personality, 23, 251-273. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1955.tb01153.x
55. Lindenberger, U., von Oertzen, T., Ghisletta, P., & Hertzog, C. (2011). Cross-sectional age variance extraction: What's change got to do with it? Psychology and Aging, 26, 34-47. doi:10.1037/a0020525
56. MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York, NY: Erlbaum.
57. Mather, M., Johnson, M. K., & De Leonardis, D. (1999). Stereotype reliance in source monitoring: Age differences and neuropsychological test correlates. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 16, 437-458. doi:10.1080/ 026432999380870
58. Matthews, M., Levin, S., & Sidanius, J. (2009). A longitudinal test of the model of political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Political Psychology, 30, 921-936. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00733.x
59. Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246- 268. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.246
60. Neuberg, S. L., & Newsom, J. (1993). Personal need for structure: Individual differences in the desire for simple structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 113-131. doi:10.1037/0022- 3514.65.1.113
61. Park, D. C., & Schwarz, N. (Eds.). (2000). Cognitive aging: A primer. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
62. Peters, E., Hess, T. M., Vastfjall, D., & Auman, C. (2007). Adult age differences in dual information processes: Implications for the role of affective and deliberative processes in older adults' decision making. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 1-23, doi:10.1111/j.1745- 6916.2007.00025.x
63. Salthouse, T. A. (1991). Theoretical perspectives on cognitive aging. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
64. Schwadel, P. (2011). Age, period, and cohort effects on religious activities and beliefs. Social Science Research, 40, 181-192. doi:10.1016/ j.ssresearch.2010.09.006
65. Seligman, C., & Katz, A. N. (1996). The dynamics of value systems. In C. Seligman, J. M. Olson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 8, pp. 53-75). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
66. Shipley, W. C. (1986). Shipley Institute for Living Scale. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
67. Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173-180. doi:10.1207/ s15327906mbr2502_4
68. Trope, Y., & Gaunt, R. (2000). Processing alternative explanations of behavior: Correction or integration? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 344-354. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.3.344
69. van Harreveld, F., van der Pligt, J., de Vries, N. K., & Andreas, S. (2000). The structure of attitudes: Attribute importance, accessibility and judgment. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 363-380. doi:10.1348/ 014466600164543
70. Webster, D. M. (1993). Motivated augmentation and reduction of the overattribution bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 261-271. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.261
71. Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049-1062. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1049