Long-Term Follow-Up of Anatomic Graduated Component Total Knee Arthroplasty. A 15- to 20-Year Survival Analysis

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1190-1195

  Huizinga, Maarten R ^a   Brouwer, Reinoud W ^a   Bisschop, Roel ^a   van der Veen, Hugo C ^a   van den Akker Scheek, Inge ^a   van Raay, Jos J A M ^a  

^a MARTINI HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

AGC; Arthroplasty; Knee; Revision; Survival

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANATOMIC GRADUATED COMPONENT; ARTICLE; AVASCULAR NECROSIS; BACTERIAL ARTHRITIS; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMAN; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATELLA; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RICKETS; SCORING SYSTEM; SURVIVAL RATE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT INDICATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; COHORT STUDIES; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS-RELATED INFECTIONS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84861185618     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.11.020     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Hawker G., Wright J., Coyte P., et al. Health-related quality of life after knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998, 80:163.
2. Emerson R.H., Higgins L.L., Head W.C. The AGC total knee prosthesis at average 11 years. J Arthroplasty 2000, 15:418.
3. Himanen A.K., Belt E., Nevalainen J., et al. Survival of the AGC total knee arthroplasty is similar for arthrosis and rheumatoid arthritis. Finnish Arthroplasty Register report on 8,467 operations carried out between 1985 and 1999. Acta Orthop 2005, 76:85.
4. Alemparte J., Cabezas A., Azocar O., et al. Mid-term results of an AGC total knee arthroplasty system survival and function analysis: 2- to 8-year follow-up results. J Arthroplasty 2003, 18:420.
5. Furnes O., Espehaug B., Lie S.A., et al. Early failures among 7,174 primary total knee replacements: a follow-up study from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1994-2000. Acta Orthop Scand 2002, 73:117.
6. Ritter M.A., Berend M.E., Meding J.B., et al. Long-term followup of anatomic graduated components posterior cruciate-retaining total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001, 51.
7. Schroder H.M., Berthelsen A., Hassani G., et al. Cementless porous-coated total knee arthroplasty: 10-year results in a consecutive series. J Arthroplasty 2001, 16:559.
8. Worland R.L., Johnson G.V., Alemparte J., et al. Ten to fourteen year survival and functional analysis of the AGC total knee replacement system. Knee 2002, 9:133.
9. Ritter M.A., Lutgring J.D., Davis K.E., et al. Total knee arthroplasty effectiveness in patients 55 years old and younger: osteoarthritis vs. rheumatoid arthritis. Knee 2007, 14:9.
10. Insall J.N., Dorr L.D., Scott R.D., et al. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989, 13.
11. Bellamy N., Buchanan W.W., Goldsmith C.H., et al. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988, 15:1833.
12. Roorda L.D., Jones C.A., Waltz M., et al. Satisfactory cross cultural equivalence of the Dutch WOMAC in patients with hip osteoarthritis waiting for arthroplasty. Ann Rheum Dis 2004, 63:36.
13. Aaronson N.K., Muller M., Cohen P.D., et al. Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations. J Clin Epidemiol 1998, 51:1055.
14. Amstutz H.C., Thomas B.J., Jinnah R., et al. Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. A comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984, 66:228.
15. Ewald F.C. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989, 9.
16. Murray S., Tsiatis A.A. Nonparametric survival estimation using prognostic longitudinal covariates. Biometrics 1996, 52:137.
17. Murray D.W., Carr A.J., Bulstrode C. Survival analysis of joint replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993, 75:697.
18. Goldberg V.M., Kraay M. The outcome of the cementless tibial component: a minimum 14-year clinical evaluation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 214.
19. Rodricks D.J., Patil S., Pulido P., et al. Press-fit condylar design total knee arthroplasty. Fourteen to seventeen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89:89.
20. van Loon C.J., Pluk C., Waal Malefijt M.C., et al. The GSB total knee arthroplasty. A medium- and long-term follow-up and survival analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2001, 121:26.
21. Ma H.M., Lu Y.C., Ho F.Y., et al. Long-term results of total condylar knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20:580.
22. Ritter M.A., Worland R., Saliski J., et al. Flat-on-flat, nonconstrained, compression molded polyethylene total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995, 79.
23. Stulberg S.D., Stulberg B.N., Hamati Y., et al. Failure mechanisms of metal-backed patellar components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988, 88.
24. Keating E.M., Meding J.B., Faris P.M., et al. Long-term followup of nonmodular total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002, 34.
25. Robertsson O., Knutson K., Lewold S., et al. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register 1975-1997: an update with special emphasis on 41,223 knees operated on in 1988-1997. Acta Orthop Scand 2001, 72:503.
26. Ritter M.A. The Anatomical Graduated Component total knee replacement: a long-term evaluation with 20-year survival analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009, 91:745.