Multi-class particle swarm model selection for automatic image annotation

Expert Systems with Applications

Volumn 39, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 11011-11021

  Escalante, Hugo Jair ^a   Montes, Manuel ^a   Sucar, L Enrique ^a  

^a INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ASTROFÍSICA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Classification; Image annotation; Machine learning; Object recognition; Particle swarm model selection; Particle swarm optimization

Indexed keywords

ANNOTATION PERFORMANCE; APPLICATION DOMAINS; AUTOMATIC IMAGE ANNOTATION; BINARY CLASSIFICATION PROBLEMS; BLACK BOXES; DATA SETS; FEATURE SELECTION AND CLASSIFICATION; IMAGE ANNOTATION; MULTI-CLASS; MULTI-CLASS CLASSIFICATION; MULTI-CLASS PROBLEMS; MULTICLASS CLASSIFICATION PROBLEMS; ONE VS ALLS; PARTICLE SWARM;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); CLASSIFIERS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; OBJECT RECOGNITION; PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION (PSO);

IMAGE RETRIEVAL;

EID: 84861185616     PISSN: 09574174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.03.023     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. K. Barnard, P. Duygulu, N. de Freitas, D. Forsyth, D. Blei, and M.I. Jordan Matching words with pictures Journal of Machine Learning Research. 3 Mar 2007 1107 1135
2. C. Bishop Pattern recognition and machine learning 2006 Springer
3. Bradshaw, B. (2000). Semantic based image retrieval: a probabilistic approach. In: Proc. of the 8th ACM international conference on multimedia (pp. 167-176). California, USA
4. Carbonetto, P. (2003). Unsupervised statistical models for general object recognition, M.S. thesis, University of British Columbia.
5. Carbonetto, P.; de Freitas, N.; Barnard, K. (2004). A statistical model for general context object recognition. In: Proc. of the 8th european conference on computer vision (LNCS Vol. 3021, pp. 350-362). Springer, Prague, Czech Republic.
6. R. Datta, D. Joshi, J. Li, and J.Z. Wang Image retrieval: ideas, influences, and trends of the new age ACM Computing Surveys 40 2 2008 1 60
7. de Souza, B.F.; de Carvalho, A.; Calvo, R.;& Ishii, P. (2006). Multiclass SVM model selection using particle swarm model selection. In: Proc. of the 6th international conference on hybrid intelligent systems (pp. 31-35). Rio De Janeiro, Brazil.
8. A.P. Engelbrecht Fundamentals of computational swarm intelligence 2006 Wiley
9. Escalante, H.J.; Montes, M.; Sucar, E. (2007). PSMS for neural networks in the IJCNN 2007 ALvsPK. In: Proc. of 20th international joint conference on neural networks (pp. 1191-1197). Orlando, FL, USA.
10. Escalante, H. J.; Montes, M.; Sucar, L. E. (2007). Word co-occurrence and Markov random fields for improving automatic image annotation. In: Proc. of the 18th British machine vision conference (Vol. 2, pp. 600-609), Warwick, UK.
11. H.J. Escalante, M. Montes, and L.E. Sucar Particle swarm model selection Journal of Machine Learning Research 10 Feb 2009 405 440
12. Fergus, R.; Fei-Fei, L.; Perona, P.; Zisserman, A. (2005). Learning object categories from Googles image search. In: Proc. of the 10th international conference on computer vision (pp. 1816-1823). Beijing, China.
13. Ghoshal, A.; Ircing, P.; Khudanpur, S. (2005). Hidden Markov Models for automatic annotation and content-based retrieval of images and video. In: Proc. of the 28th international ACM-SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval (pp. 544-551). Salvador, Brazil.
14. I. Guyon, G. Cawley, G. Dror, and A. Saffari Hands-on pattern recognition, challenges in machine learning series Vol. 1 2011 Microtome Publishing Brookline, Massachusetts
15. Guyon, I.; Saffari, A.; Dror, G.; Cawley, G. (2007). Agnostic learning vs prior knowledge challenge. In: Proc. of 20th international joint conference on neural networks (pp. 1232-1238). Orlando, FL, USA.
16. C. Hernandez, and L.E. Sucar Markov random fields and spatial information to improve automatic image annotation Proc. of the 2007 Pacific-Rim Symposium on Image and Video Technology, LNCS Vol. 4872 2007 Springer Santiago,Chile 879 892
17. Jeon, J.; Lavrenko, V.; Manmatha, R. (2003). Automatic image annotation and retrieval using cross-media relevance models. In: Proc. of the 26th international ACM-SIGIR conference on research and development on information retrieval (pp. 119-126). Toronto, Canada.
18. J. Kennedy, and R. Eberhart Swarm intelligence 2001 Morgan Kaufmann
19. Laserre, J.; Bishop, C.; Minka, T. (2006). Principled hybrids on discriminative and generative models. In: Proc. of the conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 87-94). New York, USA.
20. Y. Liu, D. Zhang, G. Lu, and W. Ma A survey of content-based image retrieval with high-level semantics Pattern Recognition 40 1 2007 262 282
21. R. Rifkin, and A. Klautau In defense of one-vs-all classification Journal of Machine Learning Research 5 Jan 2004 101 141
22. Saffari, A.; Guyon, I. (2006). Quickstart Guide for CLOP, Tech. rep.; Graz University of Technology and Clopinet, Graz, Austria.
23. J. Shi, and J. Malik Normalized Cuts and Image Segmentation IEEE Trans. on PAMI 22 8 2000 888 905
24. Szummer, M.; Picard, R. (1998). Indoor-outdoor image classification. In: it Proc. of the workshop on content-based access to image and video databases (pp. 42). Washington, DC, USA.
25. A. Vailaya, A. Jain, and H. Zhang On image classification: city versus landscape Pattern Recognition 31 1998 1921 1936
26. van den Bergh, F. 2001. An analysis of particle swarm optimizers. PhD thesis, University of Pretoria, Sudafrica.
27. Winn, J.; Criminisi, A.; Minka, T. (2005). Object categorization by learned universal visual dictionary. In: Proc. of the 10th international conference on computer vision (pp. 1800-1807). Beijing, China.