Comparing citation patterns in entrepreneurship research articles in subject handbooks and web of science journals

Proceedings of ISSI 2011 - 13th Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics

Volumn 1, Issue , 2011, Pages 89-96

  Åström, Fredrik ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CITATION DATA; CO-CITATION MAPS; COCITATION; JOURNAL ARTICLES; RESEARCH FIELDS; WEB OF SCIENCE;

EID: 84861182382     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Åström, F. (2002). Visualizing library and information science concept spaces through keyword and citation based maps and clusters. In H. Bruce at al (Eds.), Emerging frameworks and methods: CoLIS4 (pp. 185–197). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
2. Åström, F. (2010). The visibility of information science and library science research in bibliometric mapping of the LIS field. Library Quarterly, 80(2), 143-159.
3. Butler, L. & Visser, M.S. (2006). Extending citation analysis to non-source items. Scientometrics, 66(2), 327-343.
4. de Nooy, W., Mrvar, A. & Batagelj, V. (2005). Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. Hellqvist, B. (2010). Referencing in the humanities and its implications for citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(2), 1-9.
6. Hicks, D. (2004). The four literatures of the social science. In H. K. Moed, W. Glanzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (pp. 473–495). Dordrecht: Springer.
7. Kamada, T. and S. Kawai (1989), An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Information Processing Letters, 31(12), 7-15.
8. Landström, H. & Åström, F. (in press). Who’s asking the right questions? Patterns and diversity in the literature of new venture creation. In K. Hindle & K. Klyver (Eds.), Handbook in New Venture Creation Research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
9. Landström, H., Hairichi, G. & Åström, F. (2010). Entrepreneurship: Exploring the knowledge base. Unpublished DIME report. Lund: Lund University, CIRCLE.
10. Moed, H. K. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Dordrecht: Springer.
11. Moya-Anegón, F., Herrero-Solana, V. & Jiménez-Contreras, E. (2006). A connectionist and multivariate approach to science maps: The SOM, clustering and MDS applied to library and information science research. Journal of Information Science, 32(1), 63-77.
12. Nederhof, A.J., van Leeuwen, T.N. & van Raan, A.F.J. (2010). Highly cited non-journal publications in political science, economics and psychology: A first exploration. Scientometrics, 83, 363-374.
13. Persson, O., Danell, R. & Schneider, J.W. (2009). How to use Bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis. In F. Åström et al, Celebrating Scholarly Communication Studies A Festschrift for Olle Persson at his 60th Birthday. International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics.
14. Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). The application of bibliometric analyses in the evaluation of social science research: Who benefits from it, and why it is still feasible. Scientometrics, 66(1), 133-154.
15. White, H. D. & Griffith B. C. (1981). Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32, 163-172.
16. Zhao, D. (2003). A comparative citation analysis study of web-based and print-journal based scholarly communication in the XML research field. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Florida State University, Tallahassee. Retrieved January 10, 2011 from: http://etd.lib.fsu.edu/theses/available/etd-09232003-012028/