Prediction of student academic performance by using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system

Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 635-646

  Sevindik, Tuncay ^a  

^a YILDIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Evaluation methodologies; Human computer interface; Intelligent tutoring systems

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861166809     PISSN: 13087711     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bridges KR. Using attributional style to predict academic performance: how does it compare to traditional methods? Personal Individ Differ 2001;31:723-730.
2. Plant EA, Ericsson KA, Hill L, Asberg K. Why study time does not predict grade point average accross college students: Implications of deliberate practice for academic performance. Contemp Educ Psychol 2005;30:96-116.
3. Furnham A, Monsen J. Personality traits and intelligence predict academic school grades. Learn Individl Differ 2009;19:28-33.
4. Paliwal M, Kumar UA. A study of academic performance of business school graduates using neural network and statistical techniques. Expert Syst Applicat 2009;36:7865-7872.
5. Schee BM, Mullis AK, Shriner M. Parents social and resource capital: Predictors of academic achievement during early childhood. Child Youth Serv Rev 2009;31:227-234.
6. Conard MA. (2006). Aptitude is not enough: How personality and behavior predict academic performance. J Res Person 2006;40:336-346.
7. Stathacopoulo R, Magoulas GD, Grigoriadou M. Neuro-fuzzy knowledge processing in intelligent learning environments for improved student diagnosis. Inform Sci 2005;170:273-307.
8. Mengel, Lively W. Using a neural network to predict student responses. Proceedings of the 1992 ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing. 2, s. 669-676. Kansas City, MO: ACM Press, March 1-3, 1992.
9. Mengel S, Lively W. On the use of neural networks in intelligent tutoring systems. J Artific Intellig Educ 1990;2:43-56.
10. Yasdi R. A literature survey on applications of neural networks for human-computer interaction. Neural Comput Applicat 2000;9:245-258.
11. Chen Q, Norcio AF, Wang J. Neural network based stereotyping for user profiles. Neural Comput Applicat 2000;9:259-265.
12. Taylan O, Karagozoglu, B. An adaptive neuro-fuzzy model for prediction of student's academic performance. Comput Ind Eng 2009;57:732-741.
13. Crystal RS, Joseph JP. Performance measures in courses using computer-aided personalized system of instruction. Comput Educ 2008;51:829-835.
14. Vandamme JP, Meskens N, Superby JF. Predicting academic performance by data mining methods. Educ Econ 2007;15:405-419.
15. Tseng ML. Implementation and performance evaluation using fuzzy network balanced scorecard. Comput Educ 2010;55:188-201.
16. Oztemel E. Yapay Sinir Aglari{dotless}. Istanbul: Papatya Publisher, 2003 [in Turkish].
17. Baylar A, Hanbay D, Ozpolat E. An expert system for predicting aeration performance of weirs by using ANFIS. Expert Syst Applicat 2008;35:1214-1222.
18. Ramos C, Yudko E. Hits" (not "Discussion Posts") predict student success in online courses: A double cross-validation study. Comput Educ 2008;50:1174-1182.
19. Acar C. Elektrik Devrelerinin Analizi. ITU Faculty of Electric-Electronic Publication, Istanbul, 1995 [in Turkish].
20. Shing J, Jang R. ANFIS:Adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Transact Syst Man Cybernet 1993;23:665-685.
21. Aström KJ, Wittenmark, B. Adaptive Control. Addison Wesley Publishing Company Inc., New York, 1995.
22. Khalil HK. Nonlinear Systems. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1992.
23. Koral O. The effectiveness of problem-based learning supported with computer simulations on academic performance about buoyancy. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2011;3:293-304.
24. Gurol A. Determining the reflective thinking skills of pre-service teachers in learning and teaching process. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2011;3:387-402.
25. Metin M. The examinations of teachers' attitude towards performance assessment with respect to the different variables. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2011;3:269-284.
26. Sahin C, Calik M, Cepni S. Using different conceptual change methods embedded within 5E model: Asample teaching of liquid pressure. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2009;1:115-125.
27. Cepni S. Effects of computer supported instructional material (CSIM) in removing, students misconceptions about concepts: "Light, light source and seeing. " Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2009;1:51-83.