Effect of delayed acquisition times on gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the presumably normal canine brain

Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound

Volumn 52, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 611-618

  Joslyn, Stephen ^a   Sullivan, Martin ^b   Novellas, Rosa ^c   Brennan, Nicola ^a   Cameron, Gill ^a   Hammond, Gawain ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b Small Animal Veterinary Association   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Brain; Delayed; Dog; Enhancement; MRI; Normal

Indexed keywords

CANIS FAMILIARIS;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; BRAIN; DOG; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; TIME;

ANIMALS; BRAIN; CONTRAST MEDIA; DOGS; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84861140900     PISSN: 10588183     EISSN: 17408261     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2011.01847.x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Brasch RC. Work in progress: methods of contrast enhancement for NMR imaging and potential applications. A subject review. Radiology 1983;147:781-788.
2. Weinmann HJ, Brasch RC, Press WR, Wesbey GE. Characteristics of gadolinium-DTPA complex: a potential NMR contrast agent. Am J Roentgenol 1984;142:619-624.
3. Mathews VP, Caldemeyer KS, Ulmer JL, Nguyen H, Yuh WTC. Effects of contrast dose, delayed imaging, and magnetization transfer saturation on gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging of brain lesions. J Magn Reson Imag 1997;7:14-22.
4. Felix R, Schörner W, Laniado M, et al. Brain tumors: MR imaging with gadolinium-DTPA. Radiology 1985;156:681-688.
5. Runge VM, Price AC, Wehr CJ, Atkinson JB, Tweedle MF. Contrast enhanced MRI. Evaluation of a canine model of osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption. Invest Radiol 1985;20:830-844.
6. Miki Y, Matsuo M, Nishizawa S, et al. Pituitary adenomas and normal pituitary tissue: enhancement patterns on gadopentetate-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1990;177:35-38.
7. Schörner W, Laniado M, Niendorf HP, Schubert C, Felix R. Time-dependent changes in image contrast in brain tumors after gadolinium-DTPA. Am J Neuroradiol 1986;7:1013-1020.
8. Bullock PR, Mansfield P, Gowland P, Worthington BS, Firth JL. Dynamic imaging of contrast enhancement in brain tumors. Magn Reson Med 1991;19:293-298.
9. Claussen C, Laniado M, Kazner E, Schörner W, Felix R. Application of contrast agents in CT and MRI (NMR): their potential in imaging of brain tumors. Neuroradiology 1985;27:164-171.
10. Carr DH, Brown J, Bydder GM, et al. Gadolinium-DTPA as a contrast agent in MRI: initial clinical experience in 20 patients. Am J Roentgenol 1984;143:215-224.
11. Kuriashkin IV, Losonsky JM. Contrast enhancement in magnetic resonance imaging using intravenous paramagnetic contrast media: a review. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2000;41:4-7.
12. Cherubini GB, Mantis P, Martinez TA, Lamb CR, Cappello R. Utility of magnetic resonance imaging for distinguishing neoplastic from non-neoplastic brain lesions in dogs and cats. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2005;46:384-387.
13. Wisner ER, Dickinson PJ, Higgins RJ. Magnetic resonance imaging features of canine intracranial neoplasia. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2011;52:S52-S61.
14. Gwet K. Inter-rater reliability: dependency on trait prevalence and marginal homogeneity. Stat Methods Inter-Rater Reliability Assessment Ser 2002;2:1-9.
15. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-174.
16. Schima W, Mukerjee A, Saini S. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Clin Radiol 1996;51:235-244.
17. Cirino G. Multiple controls in inflammation. Extracellular and intracellular phospholipase A2, inducible and constitutive cyclooxygenase, and inducible nitric oxide synthase. Biochem Pharmacol 1998;55:105-111.
18. van der Vlugt-Meijer RH, Meij BP, van den Ingh TSGAM, Rijnberk A, Voorhout G. Dynamic computed tomography of the pituitary gland in dogs with pituitary-dependent hyperadrenocorticism. J Vet Int Med 2003;17:773-780.
19. Graham JP, Roberts GD, Newell SM. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the normal canine pituitary gland. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2000;41:35-40.
20. Motti ED, Imhof HG, Janzer RC, Marquardt K, Yasargil GM. The capillary bed in the choroid plexus of the lateral ventricles: a study of luminal casts. Scanning Electron Microsc 1986(Part 4):1501-1513.
21. Zagórska-Swiezy K, Litwin JA, Gorczyca J, Pityñski K, Miodoñski AJ. Arterial supply and venous drainage of the choroid plexus of the human lateral ventricle in the prenatal period as revealed by vascular corrosion casts and SEM. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2008;67:209-213.
22. Mellema LM, Samii VF, Vernau KM, LeCouteur RA. Meningeal enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging in 15 dogs and 3 cats. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2002;43:10-15.
23. Sturges B, Dickinson P, Bollen A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and histological classification of intracranial meningiomas in 112 dogs. J Vet Int Med 2008;22:586-595.
24. Dietemann JL, Correia Bernardo R, Bogorin A, et al. Normal and abnormal meningeal enhancement: MRI features. J Radiol 2005;86:1659-1683.
25. Quint DJ, Eldevik OP, Cohen JK. Magnetic resonance imaging of normal meningeal enhancement at 1.5 T. Acad Radiol 1996;3:463-468.
26. Farn JW, Mirowitz SA. MR imaging of the normal meninges: comparison of contrast-enhancement patterns on 3D gradient-echo and spin-echo images. Am J Roentgenol 1994;162:131-135.
27. Mathews VP, Caldemeyer KS, Lowe MJ, Greenspan SL, Weber DM, Ulmer JL. Brain: gadolinium-enhanced fast fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery MR imaging. Radiology 1999;211:257-263.
28. D'Anjou M, Carmel Én, Tidwell AS. Value of fat suppression in gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance neuroimaging. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2011;52:S85-S90.
29. Falzone C, Rossi F, Calistri M, Tranquillo M, Baroni M. Contrast-enhanced fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vs. contrast-enhanced spin echo T1-weighted brain imaging. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2008;49:333-338.
30. Ross JS, Delamarter R, Hueftle MG, et al. Gadolinium-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging of the postoperative lumbar spine: time course and mechanism of enhancement. Am J Roentgenol 1989;152:825-834.
31. Luo Y, Mohning KM, Hradil VP, et al. Evaluation of tissue perfusion in a rat model of hind-limb muscle ischemia using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imag 2002;16:277-283.
32. Thompson RB, Aviles RJ, Faranesh AZ, et al. Measurement of skeletal muscle perfusion during postischemic reactive hyperemia using contrast-enhanced MRI with a step-input function. Magn Reson Med 2005;54:289-298.
33. Pettigrew R, Rylander H, Schwarz T. Magnetic resonance imaging contrast enhancement of the trigeminal nerve in dogs without evidence of trigeminal neuropathy. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2009;50:276-278.
34. Williams LS, Schmalfuss IM, Sistrom CL, et al. MR imaging of the trigeminal ganglion, nerve, and the perineural vascular plexus: normal appearance and variants with correlation to cadaver specimens. Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1317-1323.
35. Cooper JJ, Young BD, Hoffman A, et al. Intracranial magnetic resonance imaging artifacts and pseudolesions in dogs and cats. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2010;51:587-595.
36. Sakihama N. Vascular permeability of fluorescent substance in cranial nerve roots. Nippon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho 1994;97:684-687.
37. Marinković SV, Gibo H. The blood supply of the trigeminal nerve root, with special reference to the trigeminocerebellar artery. Neurosurgery 1995;37:309-317.